★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/547/377/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
Auto approved |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/377/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/547/377/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->6 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1811</p> | |||
<p><del>The language which in this case is</del></p> | |||
<p><hi rend="underline">Now among the duplicates thereof in your hands</hi> such<lb/> | |||
would be in the one instrument the language corresponding<lb/> | |||
to <del>the</del> <add>a</add> passage in the other composed as above<lb/> | |||
of the words "<hi rend="underline">upon producing the duplicate hereof</hi>".<lb/> | |||
At the same time what is plain enough is – that if<lb/> | |||
two instruments thus differing from one another in language | |||
it were never with propriety be said <add>termed</add> that they<lb/> | |||
are duplicates.</p> | |||
<p>Question. How do you do? Answer. Pretty well I<lb/> | |||
thank you. <del>This in England would have required</del> <add>Such was the echo which in his own country</add><lb/> | |||
the Turkman had heard somewhere he did not exactly know<lb/> | |||
where. Such was the echo one has heard of under<lb/> | |||
the name of the Irish Echo: <del>in</del> <add>and</add> such is the nature<lb/> | |||
of a pair of duplicates, – question one duplicate, answer<lb/> | |||
another duplicate, according to the conception entertained<lb/> | |||
it seems by the learned penman of this Act, if <del>the<lb/> | |||
be <add>any</add></del> two instruments which with reference to each<lb/> | |||
other are duplicates.</p> | |||
<p>Upon the plan taken up by the learned draughtsman<lb/> | |||
what he should have thought might have been evident<lb/> | |||
enough is that two instruments of which it is necessary<lb/> | |||
that the one should <del>prescribe something</del> <add>annex a condition</add> that the other dont<lb/> | |||
<del>not ore</del> are in their own nature <del>of</del> incapable of<lb/> | |||
being made duplicates.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
6 Jany 1811
The language which in this case is
Now among the duplicates thereof in your hands such
would be in the one instrument the language corresponding
to the a passage in the other composed as above
of the words "upon producing the duplicate hereof".
At the same time what is plain enough is – that if
two instruments thus differing from one another in language
it were never with propriety be said termed that they
are duplicates.
Question. How do you do? Answer. Pretty well I
thank you. This in England would have required Such was the echo which in his own country
the Turkman had heard somewhere he did not exactly know
where. Such was the echo one has heard of under
the name of the Irish Echo: in and such is the nature
of a pair of duplicates, – question one duplicate, answer
another duplicate, according to the conception entertained
it seems by the learned penman of this Act, if the
be any two instruments which with reference to each
other are duplicates.
Upon the plan taken up by the learned draughtsman
what he should have thought might have been evident
enough is that two instruments of which it is necessary
that the one should prescribe something annex a condition that the other dont
not ore are in their own nature of incapable of
being made duplicates.
Identifier: | JB/547/377/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1811-01-06 |
|||
547 |
|||
377 |
|||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
|||
Jeremy Bentham |
|||