JB/547/283/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/547/283/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/547/283/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/547/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->26 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Prize  1805 1809</head></p>
 
<p>The natural state of things <add>course of the business</add> is that <del>the</del> <add>for the Commander</add> an Agent<lb/>
 
shall be appointed by the Commander:  and that though<lb/>
 
there are three classes of persons besides each of whom is<lb/>
enabled to appoint its own Agent<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> Act 1805. &sect;.</note>, ye that these three<lb/>
classes shall all of them acquiesce in the choice made<lb/>
by the Commander, and thus that the Agent for the Commander<lb/>
shall be the Agent for all under his command.</p>
<p>Thus far where it is by a single vessel that the capture<lb/>
is performed:  but if it be by a number of vessels together,<lb/>
especially if so circumstanced that in the production of<lb/>
the fortunate result no one vessel could be said to have<lb/>
contributed a decidedly greater share than the rest, then that<lb/>
an Agent should <add>shall</add> have been there, by the concurrence of<lb/>
all the commanders interested.</p>
<p>Let us take the most simple case, viz. that in which<lb/>
one Agent, appointed <add>chosen</add> by the Commander alone acts for the<lb/>
whole ships crew.</p>
<p>In this case a mischief which it is plain from<lb/>
a <add>several</add> passage in <add>both</add> one of these Acts , and <add>as well as</add> from <del>what</del> one intimation<lb/>
given by Mr Rose, is – that of the Commanders<lb/>
taking <del>g</del> too good care of himself, leaving <del>those who<lb/>
are beneath him</del> to the mercy of a negligent or rapacious<lb/>
Agent those who are beneath <add>his inferior co-partners the inferior classes</add>.  For what else<lb/>
can have been the origin of the Section <add>clause</add> forbidding any<lb/>
participation of profit between the Agent and anyone else?<lb/>
all other persons to take any share in the profits of the Agent?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

26 Decr 1810
Prize 1805 1809

The natural state of things course of the business is that the for the Commander an Agent
shall be appointed by the Commander: and that though
there are three classes of persons besides each of whom is
enabled to appoint its own Agent Act 1805. §., ye that these three
classes shall all of them acquiesce in the choice made
by the Commander, and thus that the Agent for the Commander
shall be the Agent for all under his command.

Thus far where it is by a single vessel that the capture
is performed: but if it be by a number of vessels together,
especially if so circumstanced that in the production of
the fortunate result no one vessel could be said to have
contributed a decidedly greater share than the rest, then that
an Agent should shall have been there, by the concurrence of
all the commanders interested.

Let us take the most simple case, viz. that in which
one Agent, appointed chosen by the Commander alone acts for the
whole ships crew.

In this case a mischief which it is plain from
a several passage in both one of these Acts , and as well as from what one intimation
given by Mr Rose, is – that of the Commanders
taking g too good care of himself, leaving those who
are beneath him
to the mercy of a negligent or rapacious
Agent those who are beneath his inferior co-partners the inferior classes. For what else
can have been the origin of the Section clause forbidding any
participation of profit between the Agent and anyone else?
all other persons to take any share in the profits of the Agent?


Identifier: | JB/547/283/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 547.

Date_1

1810-12-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

547

Main Headings

Folio number

283

Info in main headings field

Prizes. 1805. 1809

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in