JB/147/160/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/160/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/160/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/160/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/160/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->21 March 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p><del>Instead of</del> These embarrassed and involved accounts – instead<lb/>
 
of those of a merchant <add>mercantile</add> man suppose them the accounts of<lb/>
 
this Great mercantile country.  <add>In this case</add> What is there that<lb/>
should hinder similar merit from having its title to<lb/>
reward established by similar means.</p>
<p>On an occasion like the present suppose <del>an action</del><lb/>
a claim preferred before the proper judicatory <del>a</del> <add>– two</add> claims<lb/>
preferred by two different hands whom on this occasion<lb/>
it can not be necessary to particularize.  <add>Before a tribunal aptly constituted</add> One of them<lb/>
would I am inclined to think <add>one of them who whom has not gone altogether without their reward</add> recover good damages:<lb/>
<del>another <add>the other</add></del> <unclear>as</unclear> <gap/> I am under some apprehension<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> would more probably be the fate of another <add>the other</add>:  but let<lb/>
us wait awhile:  a trial <add>question</add> of this sort evidence at least<lb/>
in relation to it, <add>though without any such competent and constituted Judicatory</add> is about to be brought to view,<lb/>
may perhaps ere long <add>must</add> meet the readers eye.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:04, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

21 March 1810
Sinecures

Instead of These embarrassed and involved accounts – instead
of those of a merchant mercantile man suppose them the accounts of
this Great mercantile country. In this case What is there that
should hinder similar merit from having its title to
reward established by similar means.

On an occasion like the present suppose an action
a claim preferred before the proper judicatory a – two claims
preferred by two different hands whom on this occasion
it can not be necessary to particularize. Before a tribunal aptly constituted One of them
would I am inclined to think one of them who whom has not gone altogether without their reward recover good damages:
another the other as I am under some apprehension
would more probably be the fate of another the other: but let
us wait awhile: a trial question of this sort evidence at least
in relation to it, though without any such competent and constituted Judicatory is about to be brought to view,
may perhaps ere long must meet the readers eye.


Identifier: | JB/147/160/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

160

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C7

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49385

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in