JB/147/467/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/467/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/147/467/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/467/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/467/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->18 April 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p>&#9758; Extract the <unclear>data</unclear></p>
 
<p>On the occasion of a subsequent Report indeed viz.<lb/>
 
the Fifth <add>sixth</add> having for its subject the Navy Office <add>Dock Yards</add>, <del>it</del> a glympse<lb/>
of this inconvenience <add>mischief danger</add> seems <add>appear</add> to have <add>may be seen to have</add> presented itself:  but<lb/>
<del>the</del> in the <add>by any</add> character of a remedy to this mischief, in<lb/>
whatsoever office it should be found to show itself, the<lb/>
measure of <add>abolition of fees in the character of</add> a regularly and consistently <del>abolition of fees</del><lb/>
applied arrangement, was not brought forward in any<lb/>
of these <unclear>ten</unclear> Reports.</p>
<p>Had <del>those</del> the enquiries  of those Commissioners been extended<lb/>
to <del>the judicial</del> Offices of the judicial class, they<lb/>
would have found, or at least might have found the<lb/>
mode of payment by fees productive of a <del>d</del> species<lb/>
and degree of abuse in comparison of which everything<lb/>
else that is called abuse shrinks into insignificance.
But this was one observation reserved for other<lb/>
eyes.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:05, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

18 April 1810
Sinecures

☞ Extract the data

On the occasion of a subsequent Report indeed viz.
the Fifth sixth having for its subject the Navy Office Dock Yards, it a glympse
of this inconvenience mischief danger seems appear to have may be seen to have presented itself: but
the in the by any character of a remedy to this mischief, in
whatsoever office it should be found to show itself, the
measure of abolition of fees in the character of a regularly and consistently abolition of fees
applied arrangement, was not brought forward in any
of these ten Reports.

Had those the enquiries of those Commissioners been extended
to the judicial Offices of the judicial class, they
would have found, or at least might have found the
mode of payment by fees productive of a d species
and degree of abuse in comparison of which everything
else that is called abuse shrinks into insignificance. But this was one observation reserved for other
eyes.


Identifier: | JB/147/467/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-04-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

467

Info in main headings field

Sinecures

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D3 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

49692

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in