JB/034/168/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/168/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/034/168/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/168/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/168/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. Sept. 11<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head></p>
 
<p>Of all those four features no one <del>is</del> <add>but might</add> can be assigned, which in the<lb/>
 
nature of the case might not have place in a judicatory constituted<lb/>
 
in any other manner, as well as in a judicatory of which a<lb/>
Jury forms a part:  none <add>no one</add> but what might have place.  For <unclear>publicity</unclear><lb/>
might have place in a single seated and <unclear>uncompounded</unclear><lb/>
judicatory as well as in that compound one:  so likewise<lb/>
might the evidence in its bid suit:  the task of giving explanation<lb/>
and reasons <add>to the auditory</add> might be assigned to the Judge, so there were<lb/>
but one auditory, no matter how composed:  but unless along with<lb/>
the task, <add>adequate</add> motives <add>were not given</add> for the performance of it, the task might as well<lb/>
not be given:  those motives are not wanting in the case of a Jury,<lb/>
nor will they be found in the case of a Quasi-Jury.</p>
<p>Accidental as they are in their nature with reference to<lb/>
the use made of this fraction of a judicatory in English-bred<lb/>
procedure <add>judicature</add>, but for the establishment of this <del><gap/></del> institution <del>they</del> <add>these vitally essential features</add> would<lb/>
naturally have been <del><gap/></del> as unknown in English as <add>they are</add> in <del>most other<lb/>
systems</del> the judicial systems of most other countries.  But the<lb/>
<del>part</del> point is scarcely relevant.  The proper question here is – not<lb/>
what has been nor what <del><gap/></del> might have been, but what ought<lb/>
to be.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:24, 29 May 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Sept. 11
Constitutional Code

Of all those four features no one is but might can be assigned, which in the
nature of the case might not have place in a judicatory constituted
in any other manner, as well as in a judicatory of which a
Jury forms a part: none no one but what might have place. For publicity
might have place in a single seated and uncompounded
judicatory as well as in that compound one: so likewise
might the evidence in its bid suit: the task of giving explanation
and reasons to the auditory might be assigned to the Judge, so there were
but one auditory, no matter how composed: but unless along with
the task, adequate motives were not given for the performance of it, the task might as well
not be given: those motives are not wanting in the case of a Jury,
nor will they be found in the case of a Quasi-Jury.

Accidental as they are in their nature with reference to
the use made of this fraction of a judicatory in English-bred
procedure judicature, but for the establishment of this institution they these vitally essential features would
naturally have been as unknown in English as they are in most other
systems
the judicial systems of most other countries. But the
part point is scarcely relevant. The proper question here is – not
what has been nor what might have been, but what ought
to be.


Identifier: | JB/034/168/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

13

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

168

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b5 / c5 / d4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

10442

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in