JB/081/106/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/106/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/081/106/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 March 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>12 <note>&sect;. 3 Suits in pendency</note></p> <p><note>31<lb/>As to qualification<lb/>Peel's the <sic>mandicatory</sic><lb/>Chance would be preferable<lb/>but rather<lb/>have regard to the<lb/><sic>mandicatory</sic> qualification<lb/>those that<lb/>the work should<lb/>not be done</note></p> <p>As to Qualification, what every body hears though, as it should<lb/>seem nobody choses to appear to hear is that by a certain<lb/>Home Secretary for a Lord <gap/> the qualification<lb/>denominates the <add>which has been termed the</add> <sic>mandicatory</sic> was the sole qualification thought fit<lb/>to be required: a hundred desires cut one another up for great <add><gap/></add> <lb/>holes and between the day of the last chance and the day of the<lb/><unclear>appointed</unclear> in quarter one interval no <gap/> been employed,<lb/>of not less than three years.  Was the decision to depend upon not<lb/>Chance I must confess <del>I <gap/></del> as to <gap/> I should employ <add>to what chance I<lb/>should <sic>committ</sic> the matter</add> the preference to Choice <gap/> to my head by which such<lb/>qualification could have been established under the rules of its<lb/>being an apt one.  But in no such <del>page</del> <add>head in men</add> as myself would<lb/>would the power be <unclear>lodged</unclear>: and <unclear>this conduct</unclear> I say though only<lb/>to Chance <del>would d</del> this my preference would be given, yet rather<lb/>than the thing should not be done <add>at all by</add> Chance even in such hands<lb/>let it be done.</p> <p><note>32<lb/>One course would<lb/>be to take the members<lb/> of the <del><gap/></del> three<lb/>law Commissions</note></p> <p>One course would be to take for the Commissioners the learned<lb/>gentlemen who have been out of them a part of the three Commissions<lb/>which for the purpose <add>with a view</add> to refuse not<gap/> him of <gap/> <gap/><lb/>been employed.  To this <gap/> at any rate no objection could<lb/>naturally be to be apprehended at the hands of the public by whom<lb/>they are respectively appointed.</p> <p><note>33<lb/>Included among them<lb/>the late Chancellor<lb/>&#x2014; Rather he <del>in the</del><lb/>with Indications full<lb/>in view than that the<lb/>plan should not be<lb/>carried into effect</note></p> <p>Included in the description would be the late Chancellor<lb/>and with the pamphlet already <gap/> by me under the title of<lb/>Judicature respecting full in view, rather in the hands of that<lb/>public would I see this power than that the measure here proposed<lb/>should not be adopted and carried into effect.  If it <del><gap/></del> <add>if by the pursuance of</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> of its <gap/> a stronger proof it is not in the power<lb/>of language to furnish.  The <gap/> made by that <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>should I put upon the preference to Chance!</p>
<head>1829 March 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement</note><lb/>12 <note>&sect;. 3 Suits in pendency</note></p> <p><note>31<lb/>As to qualification<lb/>Peel's the <sic>mandicatory</sic><lb/>Chance would be preferable<lb/>but rather<lb/>have regard to the<lb/><sic>mandicatory</sic> qualification<lb/>than that<lb/>the work should<lb/>not be done</note></p> <p>As to Qualification, what every body hears though, as it should<lb/>seem nobody choses to appear to hear is that by a certain<lb/>Home Secretary for a Lord <gap/> the qualification<lb/>denominates the <add>which has been termed the</add> <sic>mandicatory</sic> was the sole qualification thought fit<lb/>to be required: a hundred desires cut one another up for great <add><gap/></add> <lb/>holes and between the day of the last chance and the day of the<lb/><unclear>appointed</unclear> as quarter one interval no <gap/> been employed,<lb/>of not less than three years.  Was the decision to depend upon not<lb/>Chance I must confess <del>I <gap/></del> is the arbiter I should employ <add>to what chance I<lb/>should <sic>committ</sic> the matter</add> in preference to Choice <gap/> to my head by which such<lb/>qualification could have been established under the rules of its<lb/>being an apt one.  But in no such <del>page</del> <add>head in men</add> as myself would<lb/>would the power be <unclear>lodged</unclear>: and <unclear>this conduct</unclear> I say though only<lb/>to Chance <del>would d</del> this my preference would be given, yet rather<lb/>than the thing should not be done <add>at all by</add> Chance even in such hands<lb/>let it be done.</p> <p><note>32<lb/>One course would<lb/>be to take the members<lb/> of the <del><gap/></del> three<lb/>law Commissions</note></p> <p>One course would be to take for the Commissioners the learned<lb/>gentlemen who have been out of them a part of the three Commissions<lb/>which for the purpose <add>with a view</add> to refuse not <gap/> him of <gap/> <gap/><lb/>been employed.  To this choice at any rate no objection could<lb/>naturally be to be apprehended at the hands of the public by whom<lb/>they are respectively appointed.</p> <p><note>33<lb/>Included among them<lb/>the late Chancellor<lb/>&#x2014; Rather he <del>in the</del><lb/>with Indications full<lb/>in view than that the<lb/>plan should not be<lb/>carried into effect</note></p> <p>Included in the description would be the late Chancellor<lb/>and with the pamphlet already <gap/> by me under the title of<lb/>Judicature respecting full in view, rather in the hands of that<lb/>public would I see this power than that the measure here proposed<lb/>should not be adopted and carried into effect.  If it <del><gap/></del> <add>if by the pursuance of</add><lb/><del><gap/></del> of its <unclear>salubriousness</unclear> a stronger proof it is not in the power<lb/>of language to furnish.  The <gap/> made by that <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>should I put upon the preference to Chance!</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 March 23
Petitions

Supplement
12 §. 3 Suits in pendency

31
As to qualification
Peel's the mandicatory
Chance would be preferable
but rather
have regard to the
mandicatory qualification
than that
the work should
not be done

As to Qualification, what every body hears though, as it should
seem nobody choses to appear to hear is that by a certain
Home Secretary for a Lord the qualification
denominates the which has been termed the mandicatory was the sole qualification thought fit
to be required: a hundred desires cut one another up for great
holes and between the day of the last chance and the day of the
appointed as quarter one interval no been employed,
of not less than three years. Was the decision to depend upon not
Chance I must confess I is the arbiter I should employ to what chance I
should committ the matter
in preference to Choice to my head by which such
qualification could have been established under the rules of its
being an apt one. But in no such page head in men as myself would
would the power be lodged: and this conduct I say though only
to Chance would d this my preference would be given, yet rather
than the thing should not be done at all by Chance even in such hands
let it be done.

32
One course would
be to take the members
of the three
law Commissions

One course would be to take for the Commissioners the learned
gentlemen who have been out of them a part of the three Commissions
which for the purpose with a view to refuse not him of
been employed. To this choice at any rate no objection could
naturally be to be apprehended at the hands of the public by whom
they are respectively appointed.

33
Included among them
the late Chancellor
— Rather he in the
with Indications full
in view than that the
plan should not be
carried into effect

Included in the description would be the late Chancellor
and with the pamphlet already by me under the title of
Judicature respecting full in view, rather in the hands of that
public would I see this power than that the measure here proposed
should not be adopted and carried into effect. If it if by the pursuance of
of its salubriousness a stronger proof it is not in the power
of language to furnish. The made by that
should I put upon the preference to Chance!




Identifier: | JB/081/106/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-03-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

31-33

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25893

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in