JB/071/026/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/026/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/026/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/026/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>C</head> <head>13</head>
 
<head>C</head>  
<head>13</head>
<head>Of Simple Personal Injuries</head>
<head>Of Simple Personal Injuries</head>
<note>From p.2.</note>  <head>Quest. III</head> <p>Why <del>an additional</del> <add>a further</add> punishment is appointed<lb/>
 
<head>Quest. III</head>
<p><note>From p.2.</note> Why <del>an additional</del> <add>a further</add> punishment is appointed<lb/>
in addition to that which is necessarily included<lb/>
in addition to that which is necessarily included<lb/>
in the obligation to make amends?</p>
in the obligation to make amends?</p>
<head>Reasons</head>
<head>Reasons</head>
<p><add>1. Because without such addition there would be no making<lb/>
<p><add>1. Because without such addition there would be no making<lb/>
sure that in all cases the value of the punishment should outweigh that of the profit of the offence.</add><lb/>
sure that in all cases the value of the punishment should outweigh that of the profit of the offence.</add><lb/>
<del>1 <gap/></del> A notion <del>would</del> <add>would be <gap/> to</add> prevail among the<lb/>
<del>1 <gap/></del> A notion <del>would</del> <add>would be put to</add> prevail among the<lb/>
rich, that for a certain sum they might at<lb/>
rich, that for a certain sum they might at<lb/>
any time be at liberty to <del><gap/></del> satiate <del>their</del> <add>any</add> displeasure<lb/>
any time be at liberty to <del><gap/></del> satiate <del>their</del> <add>any</add> displeasure<lb/>
Line 17: Line 22:
sum of compensation will eventually prove<lb/>
sum of compensation will eventually prove<lb/>
sufficient to answer that design. Should it<lb/>
sufficient to answer that design. Should it<lb/>
ever fail <del><unclear>of</unclear> this</del> to do so it will so often<lb/>
ever fail <del>of this</del> to do so it will so often<lb/>
leave the party injured a <del><gap/></del> loser, and <add>probably</add><lb/>
leave the party injured a <del><gap/></del> loser, and <add>probably</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the offender a gainer (in pursuit of satisfaction,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the offender a gainer (in pursuit of satisfaction,<lb/>
Line 24: Line 29:
is enough for the other to pay.<lb/>
is enough for the other to pay.<lb/>
<add>To p. 11</add></p>
<add>To p. 11</add></p>
<add>From p. 11</add> <head>Question XVIII</head>
 
<p>Why the <add>quantum of the</add> extra-punishment to Aggravation<lb/>
<head>Question XVIII</head>
<p><note>From p.2.</note> Why the <add>quantum of the</add> extra-punishment to Aggravation<lb/>
XII viz that where the offence is committed<lb/>
XII viz that where the offence is committed<lb/>
with a coercive purpose is left <gap/>?</p>  
with a coercive purpose is left unlimited?</p>
<head>Reasons.</head>
<head>Reasons.</head>
Because the quantum of the mischief may be<lb/>
Because the quantum of the mischief may be<lb/>
<del><gap/> to</del> be unlimited. See <gap/>. Of Confinement   
<del><gap/> to</del> be unlimited. See <gap/>. Of Confinement  </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

C 13 Of Simple Personal Injuries

Quest. III

From p.2. Why an additional a further punishment is appointed
in addition to that which is necessarily included
in the obligation to make amends?

Reasons

1. Because without such addition there would be no making
sure that in all cases the value of the punishment should outweigh that of the profit of the offence.

1 A notion would would be put to prevail among the
rich, that for a certain sum they might at
any time be at liberty to satiate their any displeasure
they may conceive against the poor. There is no being
certain in any case, before hand, that the sum
which the Judge may allow a man in the
sum of compensation will eventually prove
sufficient to answer that design. Should it
ever fail of this to do so it will so often
leave the party injured a loser, and probably
the offender a gainer (in pursuit of satisfaction,
by the upon the upshot of the whole affair.It is not always
that what is enough for the one to receive
is enough for the other to pay.
To p. 11

Question XVIII

From p.2. Why the quantum of the extra-punishment to Aggravation
XII viz that where the offence is committed
with a coercive purpose is left unlimited?

Reasons. Because the quantum of the mischief may be

to be unlimited. See . Of Confinement



Identifier: | JB/071/026/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

026

Info in main headings field

of simple personal injuries

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23429

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in