JB/549/160/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/549/160/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/549/160/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/160/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/160/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1829. Aug. 13.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Reformists reviewed.</head><note>Copied.</note></p>
 
<p>Page 68 <add>to 82.</add>  Written Pleadings:  including that special<lb/>
 
class of them called <hi rend="underline">Special Pleadings</hi>.  Out of his 120, number<lb/>
 
of pages bestowed upon the <del>sub To the subject</del> subject no fewer than<lb/>
<del>four <gap/> <gap/></del> <add><unclear>fourteen</unclear></add>.  "Awe in some degree" is the sentiment<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> with which, (as he informs us) <del>he had made</del> "his approach<lb/>
"to it had been accompanied".  Better for the subject<lb/>
as well as himself it might perhaps <del>if</del> have been if<lb/>
instead of this <hi rend="underline">degree</hi>, whatever it was, of that same sentiment<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> some higher degree had had place in his mind:  whatever<lb/>
degree in a word <del><gap/></del> would have <del>been <gap/></del> had the<lb/>
effect of keeping <add>him</add> aloof from <del><gap/></del> it.  Out of this same learned<lb/>
mind <del><gap/></del> <add>must,</add> at the time, have <del>been <gap/></del> compleatly <del><add><gap/></add> <gap/></del><lb/>
vanished, a principle laid down <del>by him</del> but 8 pages before:  a<lb/>
<del>vanished one of his</del> <hi rend="underline">principle</hi> with which the whole of<lb/>
the practice of written, to the exclusion of verbal discovery, on the sort of occasion in question,<lb/>
<del>practice</del> is so compleatly incompatible.  Turn to p. 60<lb/>
there <del>in</del> <add>you will</add> find him saying "Shorten the suits brought, by<lb/>
"disposing of them in the shortest time, and with the least<lb/>
"expence:  and before this, I would put an end to all harassing<lb/>
"and unjust defence, by encouraging expedition".<lb/>
<del><gap/></del></p>
<p>Now then by what means is it that a suit is<lb/>
disposed of in the shortest time?  <add><del>Ask <gap/> the mode of procedure <gap/> summary,</del></add> Ask Common sense.  Through<lb/>
the mouth of <hi rend="underline">Bentham</hi> he or she <add>will</add> answer you.  Through the<lb/>
mouth of Bentham – you and before him, through the mouth<lb/>
of Summary Procedure.  <add>If you would dispose of a suit in the shortest time, and with the least expence, there is but one mode in which you can do so:  and that is –</add> by bringing into the presence of the Judge<lb/>
in so far as they are within his <unclear>remitt</unclear>, <add>each at the earliest <del>convenient</del> convenient moment</add>, parties, witnesses – <del>who<lb/>
it is</del> <add>in a word all persons who</add> have any <add>relevant</add> information to give, <del>whether in the way of</del> <add>in whatever shape –</add> demand,<lb/>
defence or testimony.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> Well then, this<lb/>
same mode of disposing<lb/>
of the suit, <del>has<lb/>
ourselves to</del> a <unclear>rule</unclear><lb/>
by which all written<lb/>
pleadings, special and<lb/>
non special, stand<lb/>
excluded – our <unclear>learned</unclear><lb/>
Reformist has he<lb/>
any objection to it?  Not<lb/>
he indeed:  it is what he</note><lb/>
Strip the Judge of the power necessary<lb/>
to his doing justice, the power <add>to wit</add> of compelling <del>to <add>the needful</add></del> the testimony <del><gap/></del> <add>necessary</add><lb/>
<del>to <gap/></del> <add>to the formation of an adequate</add> ground for his decrees; – <add>strip him of</add> the power of giving execution<lb/>
and effect to <del>them</del> <add>those his decrees</add> when framed; – reduce him in a word to<lb/>
an Arbitrator, <add>as per page 64</add> no objection has our learned Reformist to<lb/>
dispatch thus provided for – to saving thus much in the expence.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:53, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829. Aug. 13.
Reformists reviewed.Copied.

Page 68 to 82. Written Pleadings: including that special
class of them called Special Pleadings. Out of his 120, number
of pages bestowed upon the sub To the subject subject no fewer than
four fourteen. "Awe in some degree" is the sentiment
with which, (as he informs us) he had made "his approach
"to it had been accompanied". Better for the subject
as well as himself it might perhaps if have been if
instead of this degree, whatever it was, of that same sentiment
some higher degree had had place in his mind: whatever
degree in a word would have been had the
effect of keeping him aloof from it. Out of this same learned
mind must, at the time, have been compleatly
vanished, a principle laid down by him but 8 pages before: a
vanished one of his principle with which the whole of
the practice of written, to the exclusion of verbal discovery, on the sort of occasion in question,
practice is so compleatly incompatible. Turn to p. 60
there in you will find him saying "Shorten the suits brought, by
"disposing of them in the shortest time, and with the least
"expence: and before this, I would put an end to all harassing
"and unjust defence, by encouraging expedition".

Now then by what means is it that a suit is
disposed of in the shortest time? Ask the mode of procedure summary, Ask Common sense. Through
the mouth of Bentham he or she will answer you. Through the
mouth of Bentham – you and before him, through the mouth
of Summary Procedure. If you would dispose of a suit in the shortest time, and with the least expence, there is but one mode in which you can do so: and that is – by bringing into the presence of the Judge
in so far as they are within his remitt, each at the earliest convenient convenient moment, parties, witnesses – who
it is
in a word all persons who have any relevant information to give, whether in the way of in whatever shape – demand,
defence or testimony. Well then, this
same mode of disposing
of the suit, has
ourselves to
a rule
by which all written
pleadings, special and
non special, stand
excluded – our learned
Reformist has he
any objection to it? Not
he indeed: it is what he

Strip the Judge of the power necessary
to his doing justice, the power to wit of compelling to the needful the testimony necessary
to to the formation of an adequate ground for his decrees; – strip him of the power of giving execution
and effect to them those his decrees when framed; – reduce him in a word to
an Arbitrator, as per page 64 no objection has our learned Reformist to
dispatch thus provided for – to saving thus much in the expence.


Identifier: | JB/549/160/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549.

Date_1

1831-11-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

549

Main Headings

Folio number

160

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Collectanea

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Richard Doane; Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in