★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1830 July 23 M | <head>1830 July 23 M<lb/> | ||
Review | Review</head> | ||
Chicanera | <note>Chicanera<lb/> | ||
4. Arbitratrix | 4. Arbitratrix</note> | ||
4. Enter now Chicanera Arbitratrix. Law at her | <p>4. Enter now Chicanera Arbitratrix. <unclear>Law</unclear> at her<lb/> | ||
machinery! Think whether by the art of man, by order from | machinery! Think whether by the art of man, <add>by order from <unclear>Guinea</unclear>-preserver,</add> a <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | ||
mantrap was ever made | mantrap was ever made</p> | ||
One narrow exception excepted (of which presently+) | <p>One narrow exception excepted (of which presently<hi rend="superscript">+</hi>)</p> | ||
<note>☞ Quere whether to insert<lb/> | |||
these lines. 24 July 1830.</note> | |||
<note>Inadequate arrangements<lb/> | |||
for deciding suits by<lb/> | |||
arbitration</note> | |||
<p><del><gap/></del> Inadequate upon the face of it inapplicable to the class<lb/> | |||
of cases which stand most in need of judicial service, is<lb/> | |||
every sort of arrangement for deciding such by arbitration.<lb/> | |||
Why? Answer: Because <add>in each individual instance</add> if well adapted to the <add><unclear>such</unclear></add> purpose of <unclear>such</unclear>,<lb/> | |||
the <del>both adapt</del> more manifestly well adapted it is, the more<lb/> | |||
<gap/> may be the assurances, that application will not be<lb/> | |||
made of. Arbitration supposes on the part of both parties<lb/> | |||
consent to the carrying <add>presenting</add> the inquiry to a Judicatory other than<lb/> | |||
<note>Mutual consent necessary</note><lb/> | |||
<add>that, or</add> every <gap/> those, to which it would otherwise have<lb/> | |||
been carried: or at any rate to the same <hi rend="underline">Judicatory</hi> (in<lb/> | |||
case of a single-seated Judicatory as has the same <hi rend="underline">Judge</hi>)<lb/> | |||
with other and ulterior p<gap/>.</p> | |||
<note>But where one suitor<lb/> | |||
<foreign>mala fide</foreign> has consent<lb/> | |||
to arbitration not<lb/> | |||
obtainable</note> | |||
<p>But now suppose, on either side of the suit a<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fide</foreign></hi> a dishonest suitor: <add>by</add> what inducement can he<lb/> | |||
be brought to consent what possibility is there of him giving<lb/> | |||
his consent: None at all: <del><gap/></del> for his <unclear>plans</unclear> and that which<lb/> | |||
makes him what he is is, to buy of the Judge or Judges in<lb/> | |||
question the use of their power for obtaining or retaining the thing<lb/> | |||
<unclear>or number</unclear>, on p<gap/> of a contempt put upon their <unclear>authority</unclear> by<lb/> | |||
the party on the other side. Well then, if so it be that the same<lb/> | |||
<unclear>historical</unclear> suitor is satisfied that by the assistances of the Judge or Judges<lb/> | |||
honest Arbitration or Arbitrations he will gain his point with less<lb/> | |||
expense or delay, this <add>same</add> consent he will give: on the other <unclear>one</unclear><lb/> | |||
he will not give it.<hi rend="superscript">║</hi></p> | |||
<head>Note</head> | |||
<p><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> See Const. Code Ch, XIV Judges Deputies Occasional.</p> | |||
<p><hi rend="superscript">║</hi> See above Chicanera,</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1830 July 23 M
Review
Chicanera
4. Arbitratrix
4. Enter now Chicanera Arbitratrix. Law at her
machinery! Think whether by the art of man, by order from Guinea-preserver, a
mantrap was ever made
One narrow exception excepted (of which presently+)
☞ Quere whether to insert
these lines. 24 July 1830.
Inadequate arrangements
for deciding suits by
arbitration
Inadequate upon the face of it inapplicable to the class
of cases which stand most in need of judicial service, is
every sort of arrangement for deciding such by arbitration.
Why? Answer: Because in each individual instance if well adapted to the such purpose of such,
the both adapt more manifestly well adapted it is, the more
may be the assurances, that application will not be
made of. Arbitration supposes on the part of both parties
consent to the carrying presenting the inquiry to a Judicatory other than
Mutual consent necessary
that, or every those, to which it would otherwise have
been carried: or at any rate to the same Judicatory (in
case of a single-seated Judicatory as has the same Judge)
with other and ulterior p.
But where one suitor
mala fide has consent
to arbitration not
obtainable
But now suppose, on either side of the suit a
mala fide a dishonest suitor: by what inducement can he
be brought to consent what possibility is there of him giving
his consent: None at all: for his plans and that which
makes him what he is is, to buy of the Judge or Judges in
question the use of their power for obtaining or retaining the thing
or number, on p of a contempt put upon their authority by
the party on the other side. Well then, if so it be that the same
historical suitor is satisfied that by the assistances of the Judge or Judges
honest Arbitration or Arbitrations he will gain his point with less
expense or delay, this same consent he will give: on the other one
he will not give it.║
Note
+ See Const. Code Ch, XIV Judges Deputies Occasional.
║ See above Chicanera,
|
Identifier: | JB/004/144/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-23 |
not numbered |
||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
144 |
review |
||
|
001 |
note |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
2065 |
|||
