JB/081/411/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/411/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827 May 27 <unclear>act</unclear> Petitions</head> <p>(7 <note>Supplement<lb/>&sect;. II. Elucidations<lb/>&sect;. conclusion ?<lb/><del>&sect;. Reconciliation</del></note></p> <p><note>28<lb/>As Judge an accomplice<lb/>in the above acts no other<lb/>Legislators who by their<lb/>votes contribute to<lb/>maintain this state<lb/>of things</note></p> <p>To the case of the Judge <del>by allow</del> who in this way<lb/>has been an accomplice in all the crime so produced as<lb/>above substitute the act of the legislator who by his<lb/>vote <add>speech</add> or influence has contributed to confer or <gap/><lb/>to the Judge <del><gap/></del> the power so employed: here we<lb/>have another such accomplice an accomplice in all the<lb/>crimes of all sorts and sizes which in the taxes so imposed<lb/>have had their efficient causes.  Stand up<lb/>John <del>Lord</del> Elder, <add>Earl to tax Lord High Chancellor, as well as Member of the House of Lords</add> <del>like a</del> show one of or any one of their<lb/>propositions there be any thing that is untrue!  Stand<lb/>up, and inform us in like manner.  Robert Peel the so<lb/><add>called</add> Right <sic>Honorable</sic> too long secretary of State for the Home Department,<lb/>and Member of the House of Commons!  Stand<lb/>up, professed reformists whatsoever be your name; who<lb/>in the exposition <add>exhibition</add> of your <sic>alledged</sic> <del><gap/></del> plan of reform<lb/>have either proposed in positive terms that the practice<lb/>of exacting fees for judicial <del><gap/></del> service in a word for<lb/>business done by a public functionary of any class in<lb/>the course of judicial procedure should continues, or have<lb/>passed over in <del><gap/></del> silence this <add>so</add> undeniably and manifestly<lb/>efficient cause of crimes the most <gap/> in<lb/>countless multitude!  Acceptances as you have been or<lb/>will have been &#x2014; Judge, Legislator, professed reformist &#x2014; each<lb/>in your field of action, <del>can accomplices in</del> can anything<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>better</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> better than mental<lb/>blandness, where perspicacity<lb/>was a duty,<lb/>have exempted you<lb/>from the expectation of<lb/>being willing one. <add><unclear>a</unclear></add> </p>  
<head>1827 May 27 <unclear>act</unclear> Petitions</head> <p>(7 <note>Supplement<lb/>&sect;. II. Elucidations<lb/>&sect;. Conclusion ?<lb/><del>&sect;. Reconciliation</del></note></p> <p><note>28<lb/>As Judge an accomplice<lb/>in the above acts no other<lb/>Legislators who by their<lb/>votes contribute to<lb/>maintain this state<lb/>of things</note></p> <p>To the case of the Judge <del>by allow</del> who in this way<lb/>has been an accomplice in all the crime so produced as<lb/>above substitute the act of the legislator who by his<lb/>vote <add>speech</add> or influence has contributed to confer on or secure<lb/>to the Judge <del><gap/></del> the power so employed: here we<lb/>have another such accomplice &#x2014; an accomplice in all the<lb/>crimes of all sorts and sizes which in the taxes so imposed<lb/>have had their efficient causes.  Stand up<lb/>John <del>Lord</del> Elder, <add>Earl of to tax Lord High Chancellor, as well as Member of the House of Lords</add> <del>like a</del> show one of or any one of their<lb/>propositions there be any thing that is untrue!  Stand<lb/>up, and inform us in like manner.  Robert Peel the so<lb/><add>called</add> Right <sic>Honorable</sic> too long Secretary of State for the Home Department,<lb/>and Member of the House of Commons!  Stand<lb/>up, professed reformists whatsoever be your name; who<lb/>in the exposition <add>exhibition</add> of your <sic>alledged</sic> <del><gap/></del> plan of reform<lb/>have either proposed in positive terms that the practice<lb/>of exacting fees for judicial <del><gap/></del> services or in a word for<lb/>business done by a public functionary of any class in<lb/>the course of judicial procedure should continue, or have<lb/>passed over in <del><gap/></del> silence this <add>so</add> undeniably and manifestly<lb/>efficient cause of crimes the most flagitious in<lb/>countless multitude!  Accomplices as you have been or<lb/>will have been &#x2014; Judge, Legislator, professed Reformist &#x2014; each<lb/>in your field of action, <del>can accomplices in</del> can anything<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>better</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> better than mental<lb/>blindness, where perspicacity<lb/>was a duty,<lb/>have exempted you<lb/>from the imputation of<lb/>being willing ones. <add><unclear>a</unclear></add> </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:27, 26 January 2024

Click Here To Edit

1827 May 27 act Petitions

(7 Supplement
§. II. Elucidations
§. Conclusion ?
§. Reconciliation

28
As Judge an accomplice
in the above acts no other
Legislators who by their
votes contribute to
maintain this state
of things

To the case of the Judge by allow who in this way
has been an accomplice in all the crime so produced as
above substitute the act of the legislator who by his
vote speech or influence has contributed to confer on or secure
to the Judge the power so employed: here we
have another such accomplice — an accomplice in all the
crimes of all sorts and sizes which in the taxes so imposed
have had their efficient causes. Stand up
John Lord Elder, Earl of to tax Lord High Chancellor, as well as Member of the House of Lords like a show one of or any one of their
propositions there be any thing that is untrue! Stand
up, and inform us in like manner. Robert Peel the so
called Right Honorable too long Secretary of State for the Home Department,
and Member of the House of Commons! Stand
up, professed reformists whatsoever be your name; who
in the exposition exhibition of your alledged plan of reform
have either proposed in positive terms that the practice
of exacting fees for judicial services or in a word for
business done by a public functionary of any class in
the course of judicial procedure should continue, or have
passed over in silence this so undeniably and manifestly
efficient cause of crimes the most flagitious in
countless multitude! Accomplices as you have been or
will have been — Judge, Legislator, professed Reformist — each
in your field of action, can accomplices in can anything
better
better than mental
blindness, where perspicacity
was a duty,
have exempted you
from the imputation of
being willing ones. a



Identifier: | JB/081/411/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

28

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

411

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26198

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in