★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
with "hearing the circumstances of the case," in so far<lb/> | with "hearing the circumstances of the case," in so far<lb/> | ||
as they were to be heard for the supposed applicant — the<lb/> | as they were to be heard for the supposed applicant — the<lb/> | ||
proposed demandant | proposed demandant — and supposing the <del><gap/></del> application<lb/> | ||
<unclear>complied</unclear> with <unclear>continued</unclear>, by hearing | <unclear>complied</unclear> with <unclear>continued</unclear>, by hearing <unclear>plea</unclear> from the<lb/> | ||
proposed defendant, and any such other Evidence holder<lb/> | proposed defendant, and any such other Evidence holder<lb/> | ||
as it happened to the | as it happened to the individual case to afford?</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1830. July 28
Review
Chicania
2 Smalldebtia
☞ Write on the supposition of its belonging to Legacia.
Might not these be advantageously substitutes to what had been
Now for reinquiries written before with Smalldebtia
under Reinquiry?
1. Reinquiry the first — §.54. Against the defendant
judgment is supposed to have been signed. What
follows? execution? No: but if said Defendant
pleases, a fresh battle carried on — let any man
who thinks it worth his while, on consulting consultation had with his
imagination, say have
some time afterwards (when?) the defendant "appears" (where?)
"at the day mentioned in the summons" (what summons?)
whereupon comes power to the Judge "to diminish the
"sum for which judgment shall have been signed, upon
"hearing the circumstances of the case." What if, indeed
instead of a string of special pleadings the suit had begun
with "hearing the circumstances of the case," in so far
as they were to be heard for the supposed applicant — the
proposed demandant — and supposing the application
complied with continued, by hearing plea from the
proposed defendant, and any such other Evidence holder
as it happened to the individual case to afford?
|
Identifier: | JB/004/172/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-28 |
|||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
172 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
2093 |
|||
