JB/044/059/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/044/059/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/044/059/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/044/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/044/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. May 26<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>U.S.</head></p>
 
<p>2.  As to the Double-legislature <add>or say Two-House</add> system</p>
 
<p>In this case neither is <del>the absurdity</del> <add>there any absurdity that can be called</add> flagrant, nor<lb/>
 
comparatively speaking, are the mischievous<del>ness</del> <add>effects</add> very considerable.</p>
<p>This case is the case of a good government:  a good government<lb/>
which for want of experience, is not sufficiently satisfied<lb/>
with its own goodness.</p>
<p>In this case though <add>perhaps</add> by the restriction no very great<lb/>
harm is <add><del>perha</del></add> done – for <add>by</add> the goodness of the government the possibility<lb/>
of all great harm has been effectually excluded, yet some<lb/>
harm has been done, <del>and harm is the only effect the</del><lb/>
and with the exception of <del>the</del> <add>such</add> confidence and satisfaction <del>thus produced</del> <add>as may have thus produced</add><lb/>
under the denomination of <hi rend="underline">harm</hi> may be comprized every<lb/>
<add><del>every</del></add> thing that has been <add><del>produced</del></add> done.</p>
<p>In the <del>Anglo</del> American <add>hemisphere, it is in the Anglo-American</add> United States it is that this<lb/>
system had its origin:  in so far as it has been <add><del>pursued</del></add> employed<lb/>
in any other State, it is from that <add>State or</add> cluster of States that<lb/>
it has been copied or imitated.  <add>In</add> Those spaces either the<lb/>
whole <add>essence of the</add> genus <del>of</del> the most at any rate the principal part<lb/>
of the genus being contained, <del>in</del> <add>by</add> no <del>further</del> <add>higher</add> ascent in the<lb/>
climax of generalization does any advantage seem to<lb/>
be afforded.</p>
<p>To the case of the Anglo-American United States<lb/>
let the <add><del><gap/></del></add> examination therefore be <del>limited</del> <add>confined</add>.  An individual<lb/>
object being thus throughout in view <add>by</add> so much <add>more</add> clearly<lb/>
<del>will <gap/> be <gap/></del> <unclear>conceived</unclear> will therefore be every idea <del>which<lb/>
there may be occasion to bring to view</del> <add><del>will therefore be the conception</del> produced by whatsoever word,</add><lb/>
the occasion may require to be employed.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:08, 15 May 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. May 26
U.S.

2. As to the Double-legislature or say Two-House system

In this case neither is the absurdity there any absurdity that can be called flagrant, nor
comparatively speaking, are the mischievousness effects very considerable.

This case is the case of a good government: a good government
which for want of experience, is not sufficiently satisfied
with its own goodness.

In this case though perhaps by the restriction no very great
harm is perha done – for by the goodness of the government the possibility
of all great harm has been effectually excluded, yet some
harm has been done, and harm is the only effect the
and with the exception of the such confidence and satisfaction thus produced as may have thus produced
under the denomination of harm may be comprized every
every thing that has been produced done.

In the Anglo American hemisphere, it is in the Anglo-American United States it is that this
system had its origin: in so far as it has been pursued employed
in any other State, it is from that State or cluster of States that
it has been copied or imitated. In Those spaces either the
whole essence of the genus of the most at any rate the principal part
of the genus being contained, in by no further higher ascent in the
climax of generalization does any advantage seem to
be afforded.

To the case of the Anglo-American United States
let the examination therefore be limited confined. An individual
object being thus throughout in view by so much more clearly
will be conceived will therefore be every idea which
there may be occasion to bring to view
will therefore be the conception produced by whatsoever word,
the occasion may require to be employed.


Identifier: | JB/044/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 44.

Date_1

1823-05-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 4

Box

044

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

constitut. code us

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e9 / f46

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13844

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in