★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/055/029/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827 May 10.<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>5<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> I all-embracing arrangements <add>Statements</add></note><lb/>(3 <note>§.2. Enumeration and explanation</note></p> <p><note>(Note | <head>1827 May 10.<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>5<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> I all-embracing arrangements <add>Statements</add></note><lb/>(3 <note>§.2. Enumeration and explanation</note></p> <p><note>(Note) <add>(a)</add> the word real<lb/>labouring under two<lb/>disadvantages 1. Obscurity<lb/><del>and <gap/></del> to a person<lb/>unconversant with the<lb/>Latin language 2. Ambiguity<lb/><del><gap/><gap/></del> from the 2<lb/>senses attributed to it 1.<lb/><hi rend="underline">appertaining to things</hi> as<lb/>above 2. <hi rend="underline">true & genuine</hi><lb/>in contradistinction to<lb/><hi rend="underline">false & spurious</hi>. In<lb/>both senses will occasion<lb/><hi rend="underline">require it to be employed</hi><lb/>throughout this work.</note></p> <p>Note <add>(a) ?</add></p> <p><del><gap/><gap/></del> Behold here a <add>the</add> disadvantages under which the<lb/>attribution <hi rend="underline">real</hi> on this as on other occasions, labours: these are<lb/>1. obscurity and 2 ambiguity. To <add>a</add> person unconversant with the<lb/>Latin language it does not convey an idea so <unclear>luminary</unclear><lb/>as to a person <del><gap/></del> conversant with that language. The idea<lb/>meant to be conveyed by it is that which stands expressed by the<lb/>words <hi rend="underline">appertaining to a thing</hi>: and this is the idea which accordingly<lb/>it does convey to the mind of a person conversant in that<lb/>language: <foreign><hi rend="underline">res</hi></foreign> being in Latin the word that corresponds to thing in<lb/>English. <sic><hi rend="underline">Thingish</hi></sic> if the word were in use is endurable to<lb/>an English ear as the word which <add>instead of the word real</add> would have been employed.</p> <p>But <sic><hi rend="underline">thingish</hi></sic> would not be endurable to an English ear,<lb/>any more than <sic><hi rend="underline">choisial</hi></sic> <del><gap/></del> to a French ear <sic>choisial</sic>.<lb/>Thence it is that as need for the requisite <hi rend="underline">conjugate</hi> of thing<lb/>and <hi rend="underline">chose</hi> <del><gap/></del> French as well as English are reduced to borrow <add>import</add><lb/>from the Latin, the word <hi rend="underline">real</hi>.</p> <p>Then as to ambiguity. A widely different import <add>idea</add><lb/>for the designation of which this same attribution real is employed<lb/>is that of true and genuine in contradistinction and opposition<lb/>to <del>sp</del> false and spurious.</p> <p>As Of this word in both these its significations the need<lb/>of making use would be continually having place throughout its<lb/>work, hence the use of giving intimation first, once for all<lb/>as in this the first occasion <add>of the occasion by which</add> of its being employed.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1827 May 10.
Procedure Code
5
Ch. I all-embracing arrangements Statements
(3 §.2. Enumeration and explanation
(Note) (a) the word real
labouring under two
disadvantages 1. Obscurity
and to a person
unconversant with the
Latin language 2. Ambiguity
from the 2
senses attributed to it 1.
appertaining to things as
above 2. true & genuine
in contradistinction to
false & spurious. In
both senses will occasion
require it to be employed
throughout this work.
Note (a) ?
Behold here a the disadvantages under which the
attribution real on this as on other occasions, labours: these are
1. obscurity and 2 ambiguity. To a person unconversant with the
Latin language it does not convey an idea so luminary
as to a person conversant with that language. The idea
meant to be conveyed by it is that which stands expressed by the
words appertaining to a thing: and this is the idea which accordingly
it does convey to the mind of a person conversant in that
language: res being in Latin the word that corresponds to thing in
English. Thingish if the word were in use is endurable to
an English ear as the word which instead of the word real would have been employed.
But thingish would not be endurable to an English ear,
any more than choisial to a French ear choisial.
Thence it is that as need for the requisite conjugate of thing
and chose French as well as English are reduced to borrow import
from the Latin, the word real.
Then as to ambiguity. A widely different import idea
for the designation of which this same attribution real is employed
is that of true and genuine in contradistinction and opposition
to sp false and spurious.
As Of this word in both these its significations the need
of making use would be continually having place throughout its
work, hence the use of giving intimation first, once for all
as in this the first occasion of the occasion by which of its being employed.
|
Identifier: | JB/055/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-05-10 |
Not numbered |
||
|
055 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
029 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
Note (a) |
||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
D5 / E3 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1826 |
|||
|
17750 |
|||
