JB/004/192/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/192/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
by him" (the Judge) in matter of law, power to him to "state<lb/>
by him" (the Judge) in matter of law, power to him to "state<lb/>
"such direction" ... "and at the instance of either party" cause<lb/>
"such direction" ... "and at the instance of either party" cause<lb/>
it to "be brought before such Court of Law <del><gap/></del> ... as thet said<lb/>
it to "be brought before such Court of Law <del><gap/></del> ... as the said<lb/>
Judge ... may appoint.</p>
Judge ... may appoint.</p>


<p>Here <unclear>he</unclear> shifts the scene the inquiry being not may<lb/>
<p>Here <unclear>he</unclear> shifts the scene the inquiry being not <unclear>only</unclear><lb/>
<add>repeated, but removed</add></p>
<add>repeated, but removed</add></p>


Line 33: Line 33:
"Ordinary in matter of law": if the reader understands exactly<lb/>
"Ordinary in matter of law": if the reader understands exactly<lb/>
what is meant by this, it is well: if he does not, the fault is not<lb/>
what is meant by this, it is well: if he does not, the fault is not<lb/>
our's.</p>
<sic>our's</sic>.</p>


<note>14<lb/>
<note>14<lb/>
Line 46: Line 46:
instatnce of either party" cause it to "be brought before such<lb/>
instatnce of either party" cause it to "be brought before such<lb/>
Court of <unclear>law</unclear>" ... as the said Judge ... may appoint</p>
Court of <unclear>law</unclear>" ... as the said Judge ... may appoint</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:14, 13 August 2024

Click Here To Edit

1830. July 29
Review

4. Arbitratrix

12
3. Reinquiry Power
to Judge to state direction
to the Jury

§.81. §.3. Reinquiry the second "Direction" being supposed"
given to the Jury by
to the Jury" being supposed "given
by him" (the Judge) in matter of law, power to him to "state
"such direction" ... "and at the instance of either party" cause
it to "be brought before such Court of Law ... as the said
Judge ... may appoint.

Here he shifts the scene the inquiry being not only
repeated, but removed

13
Reinquiry 4
Power to law Courts
to direct new trial

4 §.82.4 Reinquiry the third fourth. §.82. Power to "such
Court" to "direct a new trial of any matter that has been
"tried by a Jury, on the ground of misdirection by the Judge in
"Ordinary in matter of law": if the reader understands exactly
what is meant by this, it is well: if he does not, the fault is not
our's.

14
5 Reinquiry 5
Power to Judge to
admit or reject
evidence

5 §.81. again 82 Reinquiry the fifth. "Decision" being supposed "given by him" (the Judge
"upon admitting or rejecting any evidence before the Jury"
power given to him to "state such decision" ... "and at the
instatnce of either party" cause it to "be brought before such
Court of law" ... as the said Judge ... may appoint



Identifier: | JB/004/192/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-07-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

12-14

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

192

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1829

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

2113

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in