★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/549/188/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/188/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/549/188/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1824. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 8 1831 July 29<lb/> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code</head><note>☞ Employ <hi rend="underline">not</hi> these 3 pages.<lb/> | |||
Ch. XIV. Judge Deputes permanent<lb/> | |||
<!-- pencil -->§. English &c Systems</note></p> | |||
<p><add>As to</add> The man of opulence the system is in his eyes an<lb/> | |||
admirable one. He <add>now and then</add> pays for it but <add>at all times</add> he can afford to pay for<lb/> | |||
it. At the expence of all who <del>are <gap/></del> by <add>the</add> intimation are<lb/> | |||
prevented from coping with him, <del><gap/></del> the power he enjoys<lb/> | |||
he has obtained for <add>costs him</add> nothing: he sees crouching under him<lb/> | |||
so many slaves whom he could not otherwise purchase. <del>One</del> <add>A</add><lb/> | |||
<del>word <gap/></del> phrase so short <add>A check is thus <unclear>applied</unclear> litigation</add> that <add>a</add> the idlest of them can keep<lb/> | |||
it in mind <del><gap/></del> without effort serves at once to express<lb/> | |||
their common satisfaction, and by <del>its</del> means of preestablished <add>prepossession</add><lb/> | |||
association, seem to <del>justify it</del> <add>in <unclear>measures</unclear> and unpenetrating eyes</add> give the system the colors of<lb/> | |||
justice.</p> | |||
<p>Checking litigation is to a certain degree preventing it.<lb/> | |||
If <del>by</del> <add>the</add> litigation <del><add><gap/></add> were <gap/> which it is</del> the prevention of which<lb/> | |||
is professed to the endeavoured at was litigation without <add>just</add> cause<lb/> | |||
the way to prevent it would be to <del><gap/></del> apply the <add>preventive</add> punishment<lb/> | |||
<del>to</del> in every instance in which the offence were committed | |||
– the offence of carrying on litigation <add>judicial proceedings</add> without just cause, and<lb/> | |||
not to apply it to any other. But were this the object,<lb/> | |||
what would be necessary is – to ascertain on each occasion<lb/> | |||
whether what was done was done with or without just cause<lb/> | |||
and therefore <del><gap/></del> <add>accordingly in those cases when to apply the punishment</add> never to apply the punishment<lb/> | |||
<add>in those cases alone in which</add> till the <unclear>event</unclear> of just cause had already been ascertained, and<lb/> | |||
not till after it had been ascertained. But from that state<lb/> | |||
of things, no one of the three confederates would have <del>every</del> anything<lb/> | |||
to gain: – compared with <add>what they are under</add> the actual state of things not<lb/> | |||
one of them but would be a loser. Those who were in the<lb/> | |||
wrong <del><gap/></del> would not now see any <add>feel gain or see a</add> prospect of <del>gain</del> it from<lb/> | |||
litigation: and <add>to the men of finance and the men of law</add> so many customers for the hire of the instrument<lb/> | |||
of oppression which he has <add>they have</add> to let out would be lost. In the situation<lb/> | |||
of plaintiff, the <add>would be</add> oppressor would <add>will</add> no how have it in his<lb/> | |||
power, to terrify his intended victim into a compliance <add>in the first instance</add> with the <unclear>longest</unclear><lb/> | |||
demand, or after an exhausting contest to comply with the demand<lb/> | |||
and in addition to the oppression pay the expence of the<lb/> | |||
contest: <del>both parties</del> in regard to expence both parties contending<lb/> | |||
upon equal terms, the man in the wrong would derive no advantage<lb/> | |||
from his superiority on the<lb/> | |||
scale of opulence.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1824. Jany. 8 1831 July 29
Constitutional Code☞ Employ not these 3 pages.
Ch. XIV. Judge Deputes permanent
§. English &c Systems
As to The man of opulence the system is in his eyes an
admirable one. He now and then pays for it but at all times he can afford to pay for
it. At the expence of all who are by the intimation are
prevented from coping with him, the power he enjoys
he has obtained for costs him nothing: he sees crouching under him
so many slaves whom he could not otherwise purchase. One A
word phrase so short A check is thus applied litigation that a the idlest of them can keep
it in mind without effort serves at once to express
their common satisfaction, and by its means of preestablished prepossession
association, seem to justify it in measures and unpenetrating eyes give the system the colors of
justice.
Checking litigation is to a certain degree preventing it.
If by the litigation were which it is the prevention of which
is professed to the endeavoured at was litigation without just cause
the way to prevent it would be to apply the preventive punishment
to in every instance in which the offence were committed
– the offence of carrying on litigation judicial proceedings without just cause, and
not to apply it to any other. But were this the object,
what would be necessary is – to ascertain on each occasion
whether what was done was done with or without just cause
and therefore accordingly in those cases when to apply the punishment never to apply the punishment
in those cases alone in which till the event of just cause had already been ascertained, and
not till after it had been ascertained. But from that state
of things, no one of the three confederates would have every anything
to gain: – compared with what they are under the actual state of things not
one of them but would be a loser. Those who were in the
wrong would not now see any feel gain or see a prospect of gain it from
litigation: and to the men of finance and the men of law so many customers for the hire of the instrument
of oppression which he has they have to let out would be lost. In the situation
of plaintiff, the would be oppressor would will no how have it in his
power, to terrify his intended victim into a compliance in the first instance with the longest
demand, or after an exhausting contest to comply with the demand
and in addition to the oppression pay the expence of the
contest: both parties in regard to expence both parties contending
upon equal terms, the man in the wrong would derive no advantage
from his superiority on the
scale of opulence.
Identifier: | JB/549/188/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-01-08 |
|||
549 |
|||
188 |
Constitutional Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
|||
Jeremy Bentham |
|||