JB/034/018/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/018/003: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Constitut Code. Ch.1</head>
<head>Constitut Code. Ch.1 Ruling principles. Heads deduced 2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> from 1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.</head>
<p>S <del>3</del>4. Obstacles, how man<gap/></p>
<p>S <del>3</del>4. Obstacles, how man<gap/></p>
<p>Self preference continued</p>
<p>Self preference continued</p>
Line 28: Line 28:
<p>26 or 9</p>
<p>26 or 9</p>
<p>This sum, polit<gap/><lb/>
<p>This sum, polit<gap/><lb/>
possible of purity should<lb/>
profession of purity should<lb/>
be scorned like <gap/><lb/>
be scorned like street<lb/>
walkers profes<gap/> of<lb/>
walkers profession of<lb/>
chastity.4.</p>
chastity.4.</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
Line 41: Line 41:
employed by it</p>
employed by it</p>
<p>&sect;.5. Means employed for<lb/>
<p>&sect;.5. Means employed for<lb/>
<add>concealing it kind</add> <del>masking its <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>Concealing its kind</add> <del>masking its <gap/></del><lb/>
<add><gap/> <del><gap/></del> and influence</add> <del>sinister effects</del>.<lb/>
<add><gap/> <del><gap/></del> and influence</add> <del>sinister effects</del>.<lb/>
masking it.</p>
masking it.</p>
Line 54: Line 54:
by that experience.</p><pb/>
by that experience.</p><pb/>


<head>Heads deduced</head>
<p>&sect;.5. Obstacles, how <gap/></p>
<p>1 <!-- In pencil -->(1)</p>
<p>Those stops ascertaining <lb/>
<add>their</add>existence and cause. 1</p>
<p>2 <!-- In pencil -->(2)</p>
<p>1 Practical Rule 1. Minimize<lb/>
confidence 1</p>
<p>3 <!-- In pencil -->(3)</p>
<p>2 Antagonizing  Rule<lb/>
Withhold no necessa<gap/><lb/>
p<gap/>.2.</p>
<p>4 <!-- In pencil -->(4)</p>
<p>3. Rule 3. This security<lb/>
against t<gap/> a<gap/>bout, defendant<lb/>
<add>and responsibility</add> compleat<lb/>
(Added) of rulers are<lb/>
ruled. 2.</p>
<!-- Pencil line -->&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>5 <!-- In pencil -->(10) or (9)</p>
<p>4. Best <del>scarcely</del> Partial<lb/>
impotence a bad security<lb/>
(Added) Line not<lb/>
drawable</p>
<!-- Pencil line -->&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>6 <!-- In pencil -->(5)</p>
<p>Dependence - viz an<lb/>
ex.gr ref</p>
<p>1. Of legislative or constitutive.</p>   
<p>2. Of executive in all<lb/>
branches and individuals<lb/>
or legislature, thence<lb/>
on Constitutive. 4.</p> 
<p>7 <!-- In pencil -->(6)</p>
<p>Note? Sole case whose<lb/>
<add>antiexecutive should not be</add> dependence is no absolute<lb/>
Judiciary.4.</p>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(7)</p>
<p>8 or 4<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></p>
<p>Note? Dependence referrs mostly<lb/>
yo dislocubility;<lb/>
responsibility to punibility.<lb/>
But be the are necessary.3</p>
<p>9 <!-- In pencil -->(8)</p>
<p>Argument to Monarchists<lb/>
In Monarchy (for <gap/>)<lb/>
dependence <gap/> be<lb/>
too compleat. Say, why<lb/>
the many should be better<lb/>
served by <del>the few being</del> <lb/>
their being all dependent<lb/>
in the one, then by this<lb/>
few <add><del><gap/> <gap/></del></add> being dependent upon<lb/>
them?.5.</p>
<p>&#x2014;</p>
<p>10 <!-- In pencil -->(9) or (10)</p>
<p>5. Rule 5. Bad security<lb/>
<gap/> of power except in supreme <gap/> &amp; constitution 6.</p><pb/>
 
 
<p><gap/>.6. J.Bs course efficient<lb/>
<p><gap/>.6. J.Bs course efficient<lb/>
and condam<gap/>rous: proof U.S</p>
and undangerous: proof U.S</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>Short proof U.S. 1</p>
<p>Short proof U.S. 1</p>
Line 81: Line 139:
there is self-preference,<lb/>
there is self-preference,<lb/>
But the effect in them -<lb/>
But the effect in them -<lb/>
proper and sinister s<gap/>-<lb/>
proper and sinister sacrifice:-<lb/>
free: Government being<lb/>
 
Government being<lb/>
in all. 7.</p>
in all. 7.</p>
<p>9 <!-- In pencil -->(5)</p>
<p>9 <!-- In pencil -->(5)</p>
<p>Injury other, every man<lb/>
<p>Injury other, every man<lb/>
finds opponents: serving<lb/>
finds opponents: serving<lb/>
self without d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>, none, but<lb/>
self without 9<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>, none, but<lb/>
so far as they are saved<lb/>
so far as they are saved</p>
<p>assistants. 8</p>
<p>assistants. 8</p>
10 <!-- In pencil -->(6)</p>
<p>10 <!-- In pencil -->(6)</p>
<p>viz. whatever evidences<lb/>
<p>viz. whatever evidences<lb/>
to aggregate of subsistence<lb/>
to aggregate of subsistence<lb/>
Line 102: Line 161:
maximization of beneficial<lb/>
maximization of beneficial<lb/>
with minimization of<lb/>
with minimization of<lb/>
maleficial power.7.</p>
malefacted power.7.</p>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(12)</p>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(12)</p>
<p>Resource making possessors<lb/>
<p>Resource making possessors<lb/>
of operation power <unclear>disterable</unclear><lb/>
of operative power <unclear>disterable</unclear><lb/>
and p<gap/>ible by <gap/><lb/>
and p<gap/>ible by <gap/><lb/>
to whom the common has<lb/>
to whom the common has<lb/>
been maleficial.7.</p><pb/>
been malefacial power.7.</p><pb/>
 
<p>&sect; 6. J.B's course efficient<lb/>
and undangerous proof U.S.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">There</hi>, not professions.</p>
<p>12 or 1</p>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(8)</p>
<p>In U.S. no such professions<lb/>
of purity of <gap/>tures<lb/>
11</p>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(9)</p>
<p>13 or 2</p>
<p>Causes.<lb/>
1. No demand<lb/>
2. No hope of evidence. 12</p>
<p>14 <!-- In pencil -->(10)</p>
<p>1. No demand: because<lb/>
no correspondent power.</p>
<p>2. France no sinister actions<lb/>
to <del><gap/></del> disprove by<lb/>
words.13.</p>
<p>15 <!-- In pencil -->(11)</p>
<p>2. No hope of evidence.<lb/>
No instruments by the distance<lb/>
by which the evidence<lb/>
is produced. Ch.15</p>
<p>16 <!-- In pencil -->(12)</p>
<p>Each man pursues this<lb/>
every other is emmisions<lb/>
of self-preference by what<lb/>
be feels and sees. 15</p>
17 <p>17 <!-- In pencil -->(13) see (18)</p>
<p>U.S. no exception to<lb/>
the rule - rulers end in<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">is</hi> greater happiness for<lb/>
them, all are rulers as<lb/>
well as subjects.</p>
<p><gap/> Quere where to place the<lb/>
Imperfection? whether next to<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the <hi rend="underline">felicity</hi>? or after<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">unity of interests</hi>?<lb/>
or after the absence of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">professions</hi>?</p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:40, 4 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

Constitut Code. Ch.1 Ruling principles. Heads deduced 2o from 1o.

S 34. Obstacles, how man

Self preference continued

23 or 6

True - self sacrifice possible

1. State of society highly
matured.

2. very few highly
cultivated minds

3. Moment of extraordinary
excitement

4. Interest sacrificed to
national, or evident.4

24 or 7

But such self-sacrifices
are not more
common than insanity
4

25 or 8

On conduct of the 1000,
not of one should calculations
and conduct
be grounded.4.

26 or 9

This sum, polit
profession of purity should
be scorned like street
walkers profession of
chastity.4.


§.1. Ends here arrived at

§.2. Means here employed.

§.3. Obstacles to this
Rulers sinister interest
its opposite ends

§.4. Means or instruments
employed by it

§.5. Means employed for
Concealing its kind masking its
and influence sinister effects.
masking it.

§.6. Means here employed
for checking it surmounting its influence

§.7. efficiency and undangerousness
of these means
demonstrated by American experience
with United States

§.8. Self-preference its
unity not disproved
by that experience.


---page break---

§.5. Obstacles, how

1 (1)

Those stops ascertaining
theirexistence and cause. 1

2 (2)

1 Practical Rule 1. Minimize
confidence 1

3 (3)

2 Antagonizing Rule
Withhold no necessa
p.2.

4 (4)

3. Rule 3. This security
against t about, defendant
and responsibility compleat
(Added) of rulers are
ruled. 2.


5 (10) or (9)

4. Best scarcely Partial
impotence a bad security
(Added) Line not
drawable


6 (5)

Dependence - viz an
ex.gr ref

1. Of legislative or constitutive.

2. Of executive in all
branches and individuals
or legislature, thence
on Constitutive. 4.

7 (6)

Note? Sole case whose
antiexecutive should not be dependence is no absolute
Judiciary.4.

(7)

8 or 4(a)

Note? Dependence referrs mostly
yo dislocubility;
responsibility to punibility.
But be the are necessary.3

9 (8)

Argument to Monarchists
In Monarchy (for )
dependence be
too compleat. Say, why
the many should be better
served by the few being
their being all dependent
in the one, then by this
few being dependent upon
them?.5.

10 (9) or (10)

5. Rule 5. Bad security
of power except in supreme & constitution 6.


---page break---


.6. J.Bs course efficient
and undangerous: proof U.S

1

Short proof U.S. 1

2

U.S. agrees with J.B.2

3

Effects felicitous 3

4

In Monarchies effects of their
System destined to end in disputation..
4.

5 (14)

Imperfections removing
in Ch.8. 5

6 (15)

Run but what may and
will be remedied without
change in Constitution. 6

7 (17)

None then, but are in greater
degree elsewhere. 6

8 18 or 13

Not the less prevalent
there is self-preference,
But the effect in them -
proper and sinister sacrifice:-
Government being
in all. 7.

9 (5)

Injury other, every man
finds opponents: serving
self without 9o, none, but
so far as they are saved

assistants. 8

10 (6)

viz. whatever evidences
to aggregate of subsistence
&c 9.

11 (7)

This done their Constitution
every thing desired
and desirable - 10.


Sole difficulty, reclly
maximization of beneficial
with minimization of
malefacted power.7.

(12)

Resource making possessors
of operative power disterable
and pible by
to whom the common has
been malefacial power.7.


---page break---

§ 6. J.B's course efficient
and undangerous proof U.S.

There, not professions.

12 or 1

(8)

In U.S. no such professions
of purity of tures
11

(9)

13 or 2

Causes.
1. No demand
2. No hope of evidence. 12

14 (10)

1. No demand: because
no correspondent power.

2. France no sinister actions
to disprove by
words.13.

15 (11)

2. No hope of evidence.
No instruments by the distance
by which the evidence
is produced. Ch.15

16 (12)

Each man pursues this
every other is emmisions
of self-preference by what
be feels and sees. 15

17

17 (13) see (18)

U.S. no exception to
the rule - rulers end in
dis greater happiness for
them, all are rulers as
well as subjects.

Quere where to place the
Imperfection? whether next to
the felicity? or after
the unity of interests?
or after the absence of
professions?


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/034/018/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-27, 3*, 14-17, 18 or 1 - 26 or 9, 1-10, 1-11, 12 or 1 - 13 or 2, 14-17

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

018

Info in main headings field

constitut. code ch. i ruling principles heads deduced 2o from 1o

Image

003

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman 1821

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

10292

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in