★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/055/256/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/256/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/055/256/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1825. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 10<lb/> | |||
<head>Procedure Code</head></p> | |||
<p><del>§. Cases in which the suit may receive its<lb/> | |||
termination at the initiatory <add>attendance</add> hearing.</del></p> | |||
<p>Art. 11. Unless a proposed Defendant <add>or a substitute of his</add> is in attendance<lb/> | |||
likewise, only by dismissal of the pursuit can the suit receive<lb/> | |||
<add><del>Case 1. Pursuer and Defendant <gap/></del></add> termination at this stage.</p> | |||
<p><add>Art. 12.</add> The distinction-requiring cases<lb/> | |||
in which this state of things is capable of having place, are these three.</p> | |||
<p>Case 1. Applicant one – the Pursuer: he the only<lb/> | |||
applicant on hearing him, the application dismissed.</p> | |||
<p>Case 2. Applicants <add>Pursuers</add>, two or more; on hearing them<lb/> | |||
the application dismissed.</p> | |||
<p>Case 3. Applicants <add>Pursuers</add>, one, two or <del>more</del> in any<lb/> | |||
greater number: <add>with</add> extraneous witnesses adduced by those<lb/> | |||
one, two, or any greater number: on hearing them all<lb/> | |||
or as many as <add>it</add> may have seemed necessary or useful<lb/> | |||
to hear, the application dismissed.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 13. Ground of the dismissal on <add>in</add> any one of the above<lb/> | |||
cases <add>occasions</add> <del>called for</del> on the pursuers side failure either<lb/> | |||
1. on the question of law; 2. on the question of fact;<lb/> | |||
3. or on both questions.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 14.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825. Feby. 10
Procedure Code
§. Cases in which the suit may receive its
termination at the initiatory attendance hearing.
Art. 11. Unless a proposed Defendant or a substitute of his is in attendance
likewise, only by dismissal of the pursuit can the suit receive
Case 1. Pursuer and Defendant termination at this stage.
Art. 12. The distinction-requiring cases
in which this state of things is capable of having place, are these three.
Case 1. Applicant one – the Pursuer: he the only
applicant on hearing him, the application dismissed.
Case 2. Applicants Pursuers, two or more; on hearing them
the application dismissed.
Case 3. Applicants Pursuers, one, two or more in any
greater number: with extraneous witnesses adduced by those
one, two, or any greater number: on hearing them all
or as many as it may have seemed necessary or useful
to hear, the application dismissed.
Art. 13. Ground of the dismissal on in any one of the above
cases occasions called for on the pursuers side failure either
1. on the question of law; 2. on the question of fact;
3. or on both questions.
Art. 14.
|
Identifier: | JB/055/256/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-02-10 |
11-14 |
||
|
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
|
256 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
D5 / E5 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
17977 |
|||
