JB/003/482/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/482/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
practicable in this <add><hi rend="underline">one</hi></add> case – therefore it is not<lb/>
practicable in this <add><hi rend="underline">one</hi></add> case – therefore it is not<lb/>
practicable in <hi rend="underline">any</hi> case.</p>
practicable in <hi rend="underline">any</hi> case.</p>
<p>The <del>logic of the</del> learned Baronet's <add>law here</add>  
<p>The <del>logic of the</del> learned Baronet's <add>law here</add> matches<lb/>
</p>
with his <del>law</del> <add>logic</add>.  In what law book –<lb/>
 
in what book of Statute law, of Common Law –<lb/>
 
of Equity Law – or even of morals has our<lb/>
 
lawyer <del>discovered</del> <add>made the discovery,</add> that the Trustee of a<lb/>
Creditor can not <add>be made</add> or ought not be made<lb/>
to receive his debt?  In what part of the<lb/>
Reports of the Committee of Finance has he<lb/>
read, that the <hi rend="underline">redeemable</hi> part of the Government<lb/>
Annuities consists of two portions –<lb/>
one redeemable – the other irredeemable?<lb/>
– and that the irredeemable portion is any<lb/>
part of the redeemable portion that the proprietors<lb/>
may at any time <add>by the contrivance of a trust</add> devise <del>thus</del> to<lb/>
save from being redeemed?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:15, 4 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

that stands next before it, let us try the experiment of a
it, in the present and see whether the present occasion may not at any rate, serve as an example.

But let us see what follows. A great part
"of the funds belongs" (says he) "to Trustees": and then
comes the difficulty about Trustees. Let this
difficulty, for the argument sake, be insurmountable:
and observe now, let us observe the use he makes
of it. You can not pay off funds belonging
to Trustees: therefore you can not pay off funds
not belonging to Trustees – Your returns Upon your Paying off is not
practicable in this one case – therefore it is not
practicable in any case.

The logic of the learned Baronet's law here matches
with his law logic. In what law book –
in what book of Statute law, of Common Law –
of Equity Law – or even of morals has our
lawyer discovered made the discovery, that the Trustee of a
Creditor can not be made or ought not be made
to receive his debt? In what part of the
Reports of the Committee of Finance has he
read, that the redeemable part of the Government
Annuities consists of two portions –
one redeemable – the other irredeemable?
– and that the irredeemable portion is any
part of the redeemable portion that the proprietors
may at any time by the contrivance of a trust devise thus to
save from being redeemed?


Identifier: | JB/003/482/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

003

Main Headings

manual of political economy

Folio number

482

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

192100021

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in