JB/056/239/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/239/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 6<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>Existing System<lb/>Equity Delay</note></p> <!-- marginal summaries in pencil --><p><note>21<lb/>Functionaries whose Common<lb/>Law not having<lb/>Equity set up &#x2014; <sic>Excusation</sic> &#x2014;<lb/>given For collecting<lb/>and distributing the mass<lb/>of an aggregate fund<lb/>1. Bankrupt Commissioners<lb/>under them Assignees<lb/>2. Masters<lb/>under them<lb/>Receivers</note></p> <p><note>Only for<lb/>sale of<lb/>stocks of movables<lb/>and allotment<lb/>of the proceeds without<lb/>distribution<lb/>has Common<lb/>Law: via the<lb/>Sheriff</note></p> <p><note>Masters &amp;c <lb/>trustee for<lb/>Widows and<lb/>orphans.<lb/>wolves for<lb/>sheep and lambs (a)</note></p> <p>21 By the <add>The</add> <del>need of</del> demand presented by them <add>it</add> for a more permanent<lb/>trustee or set of trustees is one feature by which the procedure<lb/>of the Equity Courts stands distinguished at <unclear>front</unclear> from that of the<lb/>Common Law Courts.  <add><del>From</del></add> For <del><gap/></del> keeping possession of movables<lb/><sic>till</sic> <add>in satisfaction for the demand</add> they can have been disposed of by Suits, <add>the produce the <sic>procede</sic> to be delivered all at once to a<lb/>single claimant the<lb/>plaintiff</add> the Common Law Cases<lb/>have their trustee &#x2014; the Sheriff. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi>  But for a long continued course of<lb/>receipt with one hand <gap/> with <add>joined to</add> <unclear>distribution</unclear> with the other<lb/>no such trustee has this same first constituted Courts <add>Judicatories</add>.  Hence<lb/>comes the demand for and the existence of <add>the Lord Chancellors</add> Assignees in Bankruptcy<lb/>cases, and of <add>his</add> Masters with Receivers under them in all other<lb/>cases: wolves under whom <del><gap/></del> <add>lay</add> creditors and debtors.  Widows<lb/>and orphans of deceased testates and intestates &#x2014; sheep and lambs of<lb/>all sorts may be placed out at <gap/></p> <p><note>22<lb/>Needed for obviating<lb/>this complication<lb/>no excuse delay but<lb/>extra disposable viz<lb/>by decomposition, as<lb/>above</note></p> <p>22 But <del>by the complication, and then</del> by the extra delay unavoidably<lb/><del>organized by <gap/> <gap/></del> which but for decomposition will<lb/>markedly be organized by it, does then <sic>compleatly</sic> produce any<lb/>ulterior demand for delay?  No: but rather for dispatch: and<lb/><del>by</del> <add>from</add> decomposition, as effected by the proposed system, dispatch<lb/>will in <del>r</del> so far &#x2014; the decomposition is made to have place,<lb/>follow of course.</p> <p><note>23<lb/>Under the existing<lb/>system, self interest<lb/>calling for, power and<lb/><unclear>practice</unclear> authorities<lb/>and produce universal<lb/>breach of trust</note></p> <p><note>Sale trustees coffers<lb/>freely moving the <unclear>valves</unclear>,<lb/>opening inwards, <unclear>stifle</unclear><lb/>those opening outwards<lb/>Under the proposed no<lb/>sooner comes in the money<lb/>than it goes out: viz<lb/>into the Great Bank<lb/>on which the continuance<lb/>in it does not<lb/>depend</note></p> <p>23.  Receipt and distribution both applied to an aggregate<lb/>of any <unclear>denomination</unclear> &#x2014; for both these operations demand <add>demand for operators to perform them</add> has equally place<lb/>under the existing and under the proposed Systems.  <del>But under the<lb/>existing system</del>. But under the existing system to the individuals while every trustee so he can but do so with <gap/> has<lb/>for <unclear>doing</unclear> profit <add>from the trust</add> to himself from the trust by the breach of it, <gap/><lb/>a most effectual stock of them are selected under the proposed system<lb/>none.  Under the existing System <del>the</del> <gap/> <add><gap/></add> move the valves opening inwards,<lb/>barely the valves opening outwards: under the proposed System equally lights both<lb/><del><gap/> at the <gap/></del> enters <del>into</del> <add>not</add> the receptacle <del>with <gap/> any</del> <unclear>amount</unclear> any <!-- continues in the margin and along the edge of the page --> thing that does not<lb/>at the next moment go<lb/>out of it: no time <add>given</add> for taking all of it.  The Receptacle (the Great Bank) <add>the only one that for any length of time</add> that keeps the any profit by it, is<lb/>it would not keep it: but it eloped not upon the receptacle how<lb/>long the money still to be kept in it. [+]<lb/><!-- above this text --> [+]2 The will in which it <gap/> how long the money<lb/>shall be kept in the receptacle is the will of a<lb/>functionary who can not get any thing by its being kept there.</p> <p><note>21(a)<lb/>Sheriff can not sell [+]<lb/><!-- along the left hand edge of the page -->[+] immovables.  He can only dispatch them by Writ of <gap/> among <gap/>; <hi rend="underline">halve</hi> thus <hi rend="underline"><foreign>toties quotie</foreign></hi> by Elgit for Creditors.</note></p> <!-- line across the page in ink --> <p>Note (a)</p> <p>(a) Competent to the sale of movables, Common Law was not competent<lb/>to the sale of immovable ones.  It could divide land but it could not<lb/>sell <add>a</add> land  By <unclear>act of partition</unclear> is <gap/> to divide land among<lb/>claimants in any number rightly entitled so it was by <gap/>, not otherwise<lb/>and how clumsily so ever in one way or other divide the land it did.<lb/>By Writ of Eligit it then undertook to divide land: but in this case no <add>otherwise</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> otherwise than in <unclear>halves</unclear>.<lb/>Whatsoever was his due<lb/>what had he got of his Debt<lb/>if a <gap/> was the half<lb/>of what he paid the <gap/><lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> possessor of.  First creditor <add><del><gap/></del> <gap/></add> half of the whole: secondly say creditor half of the remaining half, and so on <sic>till</sic> by arrival at the last alas, decomposition ceased. End of a Note</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:09, 8 September 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 6
Law Amendment

ult
Propositions
Ch. Procedure
Existing System
Equity Delay

21
Functionaries whose Common
Law not having
Equity set up — Excusation
given For collecting
and distributing the mass
of an aggregate fund
1. Bankrupt Commissioners
under them Assignees
2. Masters
under them
Receivers

Only for
sale of
stocks of movables
and allotment
of the proceeds without
distribution
has Common
Law: via the
Sheriff

Masters &c
trustee for
Widows and
orphans.
wolves for
sheep and lambs (a)

21 By the The need of demand presented by them it for a more permanent
trustee or set of trustees is one feature by which the procedure
of the Equity Courts stands distinguished at front from that of the
Common Law Courts. From For keeping possession of movables
till in satisfaction for the demand they can have been disposed of by Suits, the produce the procede to be delivered all at once to a
single claimant the
plaintiff
the Common Law Cases
have their trustee — the Sheriff. (a) But for a long continued course of
receipt with one hand with joined to distribution with the other
no such trustee has this same first constituted Courts Judicatories. Hence
comes the demand for and the existence of the Lord Chancellors Assignees in Bankruptcy
cases, and of his Masters with Receivers under them in all other
cases: wolves under whom lay creditors and debtors. Widows
and orphans of deceased testates and intestates — sheep and lambs of
all sorts may be placed out at

22
Needed for obviating
this complication
no excuse delay but
extra disposable viz
by decomposition, as
above

22 But by the complication, and then by the extra delay unavoidably
organized by which but for decomposition will
markedly be organized by it, does then compleatly produce any
ulterior demand for delay? No: but rather for dispatch: and
by from decomposition, as effected by the proposed system, dispatch
will in r so far — the decomposition is made to have place,
follow of course.

23
Under the existing
system, self interest
calling for, power and
practice authorities
and produce universal
breach of trust

Sale trustees coffers
freely moving the valves,
opening inwards, stifle
those opening outwards
Under the proposed no
sooner comes in the money
than it goes out: viz
into the Great Bank
on which the continuance
in it does not
depend

23. Receipt and distribution both applied to an aggregate
of any denomination — for both these operations demand demand for operators to perform them has equally place
under the existing and under the proposed Systems. But under the
existing system
. But under the existing system to the individuals while every trustee so he can but do so with has
for doing profit from the trust to himself from the trust by the breach of it,
a most effectual stock of them are selected under the proposed system
none. Under the existing System the move the valves opening inwards,
barely the valves opening outwards: under the proposed System equally lights both
at the enters into not the receptacle with any amount any thing that does not
at the next moment go
out of it: no time given for taking all of it. The Receptacle (the Great Bank) the only one that for any length of time that keeps the any profit by it, is
it would not keep it: but it eloped not upon the receptacle how
long the money still to be kept in it. [+]
[+]2 The will in which it how long the money
shall be kept in the receptacle is the will of a
functionary who can not get any thing by its being kept there.

21(a)
Sheriff can not sell [+]
[+] immovables. He can only dispatch them by Writ of among ; halve thus toties quotie by Elgit for Creditors.

Note (a)

(a) Competent to the sale of movables, Common Law was not competent
to the sale of immovable ones. It could divide land but it could not
sell a land By act of partition is to divide land among
claimants in any number rightly entitled so it was by , not otherwise
and how clumsily so ever in one way or other divide the land it did.
By Writ of Eligit it then undertook to divide land: but in this case no otherwise
otherwise than in halves.
Whatsoever was his due
what had he got of his Debt
if a was the half
of what he paid the
possessor of. First creditor half of the whole: secondly say creditor half of the remaining half, and so on till by arrival at the last alas, decomposition ceased. End of a Note



Identifier: | JB/056/239/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

21-23, 21a

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

239

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Note (a)

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C6 / E6

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18295

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in