JB/064/010/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:24, 13 December 2024

1827 June 22nd
Penal Code

Division of Offences
Nomenclation of Offences

1
Doctrine of offences
the nosology of the
body politic – the
rest of the Penal
Code & Procedure
Code the Therapeutics

2
This comparison
not a matter of
mere ornament but
productive of great
elucidation in its
details.

3
As to denominations
the legislator Raving
found a separate
conception of each
moral evil encountered
by a prohibition so many prohibitions
so many offences
his conception of the
several aggregates
present a demand
for the formation of
correspondent denominations
as expressive
as possible.
For this purpose
rules are as follows.

4
The list of denominations
should be
all comprehensive

---page break---

Division of Offences
Nomenclation of Offences

4 Continued
reason whatsoever
demand there may be
for any one these matter one
like demand is there
for another.

5
Rule 2nd. Each denomination
should be clear
& distinct.

6
Rule 3. It should be
familiar to
interested.

7
Rule 4 – This not being
possible all denominations
which are clear
distinct & familiar
should be employed

8
Rule 5 – In this case
of such denominations
no need of expositions.

9
Unfortunately no
such care exists no
term in familiar use
so clear as to need no
exposition.

10
Of every existing body
of laws the state is in
a great degree opposite
to the above described
state of perfection
(10)

---page break---

Division of Offences

11
In every community
however redundant
it is also incomplete.

12
Acts demanding
prohibition have
escaped legislators
notice.

13
Of prohibited acts
a still greater number
have received no denomination
& the idea
can only be gathered
from a large assemblage
of hetergeneous
words.

14
Rule 11 – Single worded
denominations
when in use either
were familiar when
adopted or have become
so since.

15
But scarcely anyone
to be fond sufficiently
clear to dispense with
exposition & at the
same time scarce an
Exposition to be found.

16 Remains to be provided
a list of Acts to
be qualified as offences.

17
So of acts requiring
denominations.

Identifier: \| JB/064/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 64.
Date_1	1827-06-23	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-17
Box	064	Main Headings	Penal Code
Folio number	010	Info in main headings field	Penal Code
Image	001	Titles	Division of Offences
Category	Marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C10
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	20364
Box Contents

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/064/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p>1827  June 22<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi><lb/>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<head>Penal Code</head></p>
+<p><head>Division of Offences<lb/>
+Nomenclation of Offences</head></p>
+<p>1<lb/>
+Doctrine of offences<lb/>
+the nosology of the<lb/>
+body politic – the<lb/>
+rest of the Penal<lb/>
+Code &amp; Procedure<lb/>
+Code the <unclear>Therapeutics</unclear></p>
+<p>2<lb/>
+This comparison<lb/>
+not a matter of<lb/>
+mere ornament but<lb/>
+productive of great<lb/>
+elucidation in its<lb/>
+details.</p>
+<p>3<lb/>
+As to denominations<lb/>
+the legislator Raving<lb/>
+found a separate<lb/>
+conception of each<lb/>
+moral evil encountered<lb/>
+by a prohibition so many prohibitions<lb/>
+so many offences<lb/>
+his conception of the<lb/>
+several aggregates<lb/>
+present a demand<lb/>
+for the formation of<lb/>
+correspondent denominations<lb/>
+as expressive<lb/>
+as possible.<lb/>
+For this purpose<lb/>
+rules are as follows.</p>
+<p>4<lb/>
+The list of denominations<lb/>
+should be<lb/>
+all comprehensive</p>
+<pb/>
+<p><head>Division of Offences<lb/>
+Nomenclation of Offences</head></p>
+<p>4 Continued<lb/>
+reason whatsoever<lb/>
+demand there may be<lb/>
+for any <del>one these matter</del> <add>one</add><lb/>
+like demand is there<lb/>
+for another.</p>
+<p>5<lb/>
+Rule 2<hi rend="superscript">nd.</hi>  Each denomination<lb/>
+should be clear<lb/>
+&amp; distinct.</p>
+<p>6<lb/>
+Rule 3.  It should be<lb/>
+familiar to <gap/><lb/>
+interested.</p>
+<p>7<lb/>
+Rule 4 – This not being<lb/>
+possible all denominations<lb/>
+which are clear<lb/>
+distinct &amp; familiar<lb/>
+should be employed</p>
+<p>8<lb/>
+Rule 5 – In this case<lb/>
+of such denominations<lb/>
+no need of expositions.</p>
+<p>9<lb/>
+Unfortunately no<lb/>
+such care exists no<lb/>
+term in familiar use<lb/>
+so clear as to need no<lb/>
+exposition.</p>
+<p>10<lb/>
+Of every existing body<lb/>
+of laws the state is in<lb/>
+a great degree opposite<lb/>
+to the above described<lb/>
+state of perfection<lb/>
+<add>(10)</add></p>
+<pb/>
+<p><head>Division of Offences</head></p>
+<p>11<lb/>
+In every community<lb/>
+however redundant<lb/>
+it is also incomplete.</p>
+<p>12<lb/>
+Acts demanding<lb/>
+prohibition have<lb/>
+escaped legislators<lb/>
+notice.</p>
+<p>13<lb/>
+Of prohibited acts<lb/>
+a still greater number<lb/>
+have received no denomination<lb/>
+&amp; the idea<lb/>
+can only be gathered<lb/>
+from a large assemblage<lb/>
+of hetergeneous<lb/>
+words.</p>
+<p>14<lb/>
+Rule 11 – Single worded<lb/>
+denominations<lb/>
+when in use either<lb/>
+were familiar when<lb/>
+adopted or have become<lb/>
+so since.</p>
+<p>15<lb/>
+But scarcely anyone<lb/>
+to be fond sufficiently<lb/>
+clear to dispense with<lb/>
+exposition &amp; at the<lb/>
+same time scarce an<lb/>
+Exposition to be found.</p>
+<p>16
+Remains to be provided<lb/>
+a list of Acts to<lb/>
+be qualified as offences.</p>
+<p>17<lb/>
+So of acts requiring<lb/>
+denominations.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/064/010/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:24, 13 December 2024

Navigation

Search