JB/064/014/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/064/014/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/064/014/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/064/014/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1827  Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 11.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal Code</head></p>
 
<p><head>Ch. III.  Division of Offences<lb/>
 
&sect;.</head></p>
 
<p>1.<lb/>
Offences inchoate and<lb/>
consummate – a groupe<lb/>
including preparation<lb/>
attempt and consummation.</p>
<p>2.<lb/>
Characteristic property<lb/>
in each groupe, the<lb/>
common result of<lb/>
all those is one and<lb/>
the same evil of the<lb/>
1<hi rend="superscript">st.</hi> order.</p>
<p>3.<lb/>
Not but that each<lb/>
one may produce<lb/>
an evil of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st.</hi> order.</p>
<p>4.<lb/>
Danger will depend<lb/>
on the magnitude<lb/>
of the evil of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st.</hi><lb/>
order.</p>
<p>5.<lb/>
The alarm from the<lb/>
attempt or preparation<lb/>
will be of the same<lb/>
sort as that from the<lb/>
evil of the 1<hi rend="superscript">st.</hi> order,<lb/>
but not so vivid as<lb/>
if the offence were<lb/>
consummated.</p>
<p>Example, homicide.<lb/>
In case of an attempt,<lb/>
the danger of repetition<lb/>
may be as great as in<lb/>
the case of consummation.<lb/>
Not so the degree<lb/>
of alarm.</p>
<pb/>
<p><head>Ch. III.  Division of Offences<lb/>
&sect;.</head></p>
<p>7.<lb/>
If but one evil result<lb/>
from the whole, where<lb/>
the use of distinction?<lb/>
Ans.  The greater the<lb/>
number of acts distinguished,<lb/>
the greater<lb/>
that of the acts to w<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>
evidence may apply,<lb/>
and the greater the probability<lb/>
of appropriate<lb/>
remedies being applied.</p>
<p>8.<lb/>
Suppose that, in the<lb/>
attempt, evil intention<lb/>
is perceptible – this enables<lb/>
the application of<lb/>
preliminary preventive<lb/>
remedies.</p>
<p>9.<lb/>
Preparation in so<lb/>
far as regards evil<lb/>
of the 2<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> order, not<lb/>
very different from<lb/>
attempts.</p>
<p>10.<lb/>
The importance of<lb/>
legislative operation<lb/>
may be seen to be<lb/>
caused by the surface<lb/>
they present for the<lb/>
application of preventive<lb/>
remedies.</p>
<p>11.<lb/>
Accordingly, acts of<lb/>
preparation have not<lb/>
been altogether neglected<lb/>
by the most unskilful legislator.<lb/>
Example, in contrabandism<lb/>
prohibited<lb/>
fabrication, importation,<lb/>
exportation.</p>
<pb/>
<p><head>Ch. III.  Division of Offences<lb/>
&sect;.</head></p>
<p>12.<lb/>
Offences accessory,<lb/>
what?</p>
<p>13.<lb/>
Offences accessory, or<lb/>
1. Generally applicable.<lb/>
2. Specially applicable.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:22, 16 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

1827 Octr 11.
Penal Code

Ch. III. Division of Offences
§.

1.
Offences inchoate and
consummate – a groupe
including preparation
attempt and consummation.

2.
Characteristic property
in each groupe, the
common result of
all those is one and
the same evil of the
1st. order.

3.
Not but that each
one may produce
an evil of the 1st. order.

4.
Danger will depend
on the magnitude
of the evil of the 1st.
order.

5.
The alarm from the
attempt or preparation
will be of the same
sort as that from the
evil of the 1st. order,
but not so vivid as
if the offence were
consummated.

Example, homicide.
In case of an attempt,
the danger of repetition
may be as great as in
the case of consummation.
Not so the degree
of alarm.


---page break---

Ch. III. Division of Offences
§.

7.
If but one evil result
from the whole, where
the use of distinction?
Ans. The greater the
number of acts distinguished,
the greater
that of the acts to wh.
evidence may apply,
and the greater the probability
of appropriate
remedies being applied.

8.
Suppose that, in the
attempt, evil intention
is perceptible – this enables
the application of
preliminary preventive
remedies.

9.
Preparation in so
far as regards evil
of the 2d. order, not
very different from
attempts.

10.
The importance of
legislative operation
may be seen to be
caused by the surface
they present for the
application of preventive
remedies.

11.
Accordingly, acts of
preparation have not
been altogether neglected
by the most unskilful legislator.
Example, in contrabandism
prohibited
fabrication, importation,
exportation.


---page break---

Ch. III. Division of Offences
§.

12.
Offences accessory,
what?

13.
Offences accessory, or
1. Generally applicable.
2. Specially applicable.


Identifier: | JB/064/014/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 64.

Date_1

1827-10-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-13

Box

064

Main Headings

Penal Code

Folio number

014

Info in main headings field

Penal Code

Image

001

Titles

Ch. III Division of Offences

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

20368

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in