JB/065/215/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

The server migration process is now complete but some technical issues have unfortunately arisen, including with the 'preview' option while editing pages. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused while we get things fixed. If you notice any further bugs or problems, please email c.riley@ucl.ac.uk.

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/065/215/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><!-- pencil -->1818 May 31<lb/>
<!-- pencil --><head>Offences against Condition</head></p>


<p>Not that in a case of this sort in an offence on the part<lb/>
of the Judge is any offence on the part of individual <add>in every case</add> necessarily<lb/>
included.</p>


<p>Take for example Wrongful Non Collation of Husbandship<lb/>
<del><gap/> which</del> an offence which has for its <add>inseparable</add> accompaniment <add>Wrongful</add> Non<lb/>
Collation of Wifeship.  It may be that <add>on the occasion of a litigation carried on before him</add> with or without blame<lb/>
and if with blame, with blame in respect of criminal consciousness<lb/>
and intention, or with blame in respect of <add>nothing more than</add> rashness<lb/>
only, the Judge has <del>forborne to</del> with relation to two persons of<lb/>
the opposite and corresponding sexes forborne or omitted to pronounce<lb/>
them husband and wife when in the circumstances of the<lb/>
case he ought to have pronounced them man and wife:<lb/>
at the same time that all <add>of these as well as all other</add> parties interested
</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:04, 14 May 2025

Click Here To Edit

1818 May 31
Offences against Condition

Not that in a case of this sort in an offence on the part
of the Judge is any offence on the part of individual in every case necessarily
included.

Take for example Wrongful Non Collation of Husbandship
which an offence which has for its inseparable accompaniment Wrongful Non
Collation of Wifeship. It may be that on the occasion of a litigation carried on before him with or without blame
and if with blame, with blame in respect of criminal consciousness
and intention, or with blame in respect of nothing more than rashness
only, the Judge has forborne to with relation to two persons of
the opposite and corresponding sexes forborne or omitted to pronounce
them husband and wife when in the circumstances of the
case he ought to have pronounced them man and wife:
at the same time that all of these as well as all other parties interested



Identifier: | JB/065/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 65.

Date_1

1818-06-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

065

Main Headings

Penal Code

Folio number

215

Info in main headings field

Penal Code Offences against Condition

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

George Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20868

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in