JB/056/064/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/064/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:02, 24 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feby. 7
Procedure Code Formularies

Ch. Formularies
§.

§ Examiners response epistolary response paper Blank Form

20
Examiners epistolary
response paper
Form

To the Judge of the Immediate Judicatory of the Subdistrict
of [ ] compliance and respect business and protector and compliance
Brown against White. For the purpose of the suit that this
named.



Identifier: | JB/056/064/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-02-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

20

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

064

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code Formularies?

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18120

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in