JB/056/223/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/223/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 5<lb/>Law Amendments.</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/.<sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect; Evidence<lb/>Elicitation oral &amp;c.</note></p> <p><note>17<lb/><del>in</del> Case 2 where<lb/>Form oral Judicatory<lb/>incidental</note></p> <p>II. Case the second.  Form of utterance again, the oral<lb/>Judicatory, an incidental Judicatory.  <del>To</del> <add>Transmitted by</add> the Judge of the proposed<lb/><sic>transrecipient</sic> Judicatory <add>an example of</add> the minute of the <add>product of the</add> originating examination<lb/>with or without the addition of a paper of instruction drawn<lb/>up or approved by the originating Judge: <!-- brackets in pencil --> [these instructions]<lb/>only in case of need these same instructions <add>additions to complication</add></p> <p><note>18<lb/>Case 3 Form epistolary</note></p> <p>III. Case the third.  Form of utterance the epistolary.<lb/><del>Transmitted</del> The mans of communication with the proposed evidence<lb/>furnisher being ascertained , <del>so far</del> <add>effectually</add> as may be from the applicants<lb/>originating evidence, transmitted to him either <del>by</del> immediately<lb/>by the ordinary conveyance or intermediately through some hand<lb/>appointed for the delivery of it is the appropriate instrument.<lb/>Name of it <del>the interrogative papers</del> the elicitation paper.</p> <p><note>17<lb/>Interrogating paper<lb/>Contents<lb/>1. Minutes of original<lb/>evidence<lb/>2 Interrogation paper<lb/>3 Address to proposed<lb/>narrator</note></p> <p>Contents of the interrogative paper three.  1. Example<lb/>of the minute of the originating evidence.  2. Interrogative paper<lb/>composed of interrogative drawn up or approved by the originating<lb/>Judge.  3. Address from the Judge to the proposed narrator<Lb/><del><gap/> him of</del> for <add>the more effectually</add> presenting to his mind <!-- brackets in pencil --> [information of] the<lb/>several legal ordinances and arrangements on the contemplation<lb/>of which the clearness correctness and <sic>compleatness</sic> of the statement<lb/>may be expected to depend.  These are <add>Of these, examples are the follows</add><lb/>1. Penalty <del><gap/></del> in case of falsity <add>or suppression<a/dd> 1. if wilful or as accompanied<lb/>with evil consciousness.  2. if produced by culpable <sic>inadventure</sic><lb/>and then by negligence or rashness.<lb/>2. Subjection to <del>the</del> eventual <del.<gap/.</del> <sic>reexamination</sic> in the<lb/>oral form.<lb/>3. Injunction <add>Order</add> to add to <add>at</add> the end of his response paper information<lb/>of <del>the</del> <add>as assured</add> <gap/> of communication with him until <del>by the <gap/><lb/><gap/><gap/></del> the <del>true</del> happening of the conclusion of the oral or some<lb/>other event by which the need of communication with him for the purpose<lb/>of the suit will have been made to <gap/></p> <p><note>20<lb/>Contents of address<lb/>Proposed legal ordinances<lb/>for security<lb/>for verity &#x2014; Example,<lb/>1 proposed penalty<lb/>for falsity or suppression<lb/>2 eventual subjection<lb/>to oral examination<lb/>3 Injunction to state<lb/>means of communication<lb/>4 &#x2014; to give <gap/><lb/>acknowledgement of receipt<lb/>of interrogating paper<lb/><add>5* Statement of excuse if<lb/>any for delay or none<lb/>5 Injunction <add>Order</add> to give <add>responsion</add> to<lb/>the <gap/> conveyor information<lb/>of the receipt if the<lb/>Elicitation paper without waiting<lb/>for the time by which the<lb/>required response paper can<lb/>be transmitted.<lb/>5. For non-transmission or<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> delay in the transmission of the required response paper, if any such legitimate cause or <del><gap/</del> prevention as may have had place.  See Prop. Excuse.</p>
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 5<lb/>Law Amendments.</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect; Evidence<lb/>Elicitation oral &amp;c.</note></p> <p><note>17<lb/><del>In</del> Case 2 where<lb/>Form oral Judicatory<lb/>incidental</note></p> <p>II. Case the second.  Form of utterance again, the oral<lb/>Judicatory, an incidental Judicatory.  <del>To</del> <add>Transmitted by</add> the Judge of the proposed<lb/><sic>transrecipient</sic> Judicatory <add>an example of</add> the minute of the <add>product of the</add> originating examination<lb/>with or without the addition of a paper of instruction drawn<lb/>up or approved by the originating Judge: <!-- brackets in pencil --> [these instructions]<lb/>only in case of need these same instructions <add>additions to complication</add></p> <p><note>18<lb/>Case 3 Form epistolary</note></p> <p>III. Case the third.  Form of utterance the epistolary.<lb/><del>Transmitted</del> The means of communication with the proposed evidence<lb/>furnisher being ascertained , <del>so far</del> <add>effectually</add> as may be from the applicants<lb/>originating evidence, transmitted to him either <del>by</del> immediately<lb/>by the ordinary conveyance or intermediately through some hand<lb/>appointed for the delivery of it is the appropriate instrument.<lb/>Name of it <del>the interrogative papers</del> the elicitation paper.</p> <p><note>19<lb/>Interrogating paper<lb/>Contents<lb/>1. Minutes of original<lb/>evidence<lb/>2 Interrogation paper<lb/>3 Address to proposed<lb/>narrator</note></p> <p>Contents of the interrogative paper three.  1. Example<lb/>of the minute of the originating evidence.  2. Interrogative paper<lb/>composed of interrogative drawn up or approved by the originating<lb/>Judge.  3. Address from the Judge to the proposed narrator<lb/><del>informing him of</del> for <add>the more effectually</add> presenting to his mind <!-- brackets in pencil --> [information of] the<lb/>several legal ordinances and arrangements on the contemplation<lb/>of which the clearness correctness and <sic>compleatness</sic> of the statement<lb/>may be expected to depend.  These are <add>Of these, examples are the follows</add></p> <p><note>20<lb/>Contents of address<lb/>Proposed legal ordinances<lb/>for security<lb/>for verity &#x2014; Examples<lb/>1 proposed penalty<lb/>for falsity or suppression<lb/>2 eventual subjection<lb/>to oral examination<lb/>3 Injunction to state<lb/>means of communication<lb/><gap/> &#x2014; to give <gap/><lb/>acknowledgement of receipt<lb/>of interrogating paper<lb/><add>5* Statement of excuses if<lb/>any for delay or non<lb/>responsion</add><lb/>4 Injunction <add>Order</add> to give to<lb/>the <gap/> conveyor information<lb/>of the receipt if the<lb/>Elicitation paper without waiting<lb/>for the time by which the<lb/>required Response paper can<lb/>be transmitted.<lb/>5. For non-transmission or<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> delay in the transmission of the required Response paper, if any such legitimate cause or <del><gap/</del> prevention as may have had place.  See Prop. Excuse.</note></p><lb/>1. Penalty <del><gap/></del> in case of falsity <add>or suppression</add> 1. if wilful or as accompanied<lb/>with evil consciousness.  2. if produced by culpable inadvertency<lb/>and then by negligence or rashness.<lb/>2. Subjection to <del>the</del> eventual <del><gap/></del> <sic>reexamination</sic> in the<lb/>oral form.<lb/>3. Injunction <add>Order</add> to add <del>to</del> <add>at</add> the end of his response paper information<lb/>of <del>the</del> <add>an assured</add> means of communication with him until <del>by the <gap/><lb/><gap/><gap/></del> the <del>time</del> happening of the conclusion of the oral or some<lb/>other event by which the need of communication with him for the purpose<lb/>of the suit will have been made to cease</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Latest revision as of 16:29, 14 August 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 5
Law Amendments.

ult
Propositions
Ch. Procedure
§ Evidence
Elicitation oral &c.

17
In Case 2 where
Form oral Judicatory
incidental

II. Case the second. Form of utterance again, the oral
Judicatory, an incidental Judicatory. To Transmitted by the Judge of the proposed
transrecipient Judicatory an example of the minute of the product of the originating examination
with or without the addition of a paper of instruction drawn
up or approved by the originating Judge: [these instructions]
only in case of need these same instructions additions to complication

18
Case 3 Form epistolary

III. Case the third. Form of utterance the epistolary.
Transmitted The means of communication with the proposed evidence
furnisher being ascertained , so far effectually as may be from the applicants
originating evidence, transmitted to him either by immediately
by the ordinary conveyance or intermediately through some hand
appointed for the delivery of it is the appropriate instrument.
Name of it the interrogative papers the elicitation paper.

19
Interrogating paper
Contents
1. Minutes of original
evidence
2 Interrogation paper
3 Address to proposed
narrator

Contents of the interrogative paper three. 1. Example
of the minute of the originating evidence. 2. Interrogative paper
composed of interrogative drawn up or approved by the originating
Judge. 3. Address from the Judge to the proposed narrator
informing him of for the more effectually presenting to his mind [information of] the
several legal ordinances and arrangements on the contemplation
of which the clearness correctness and compleatness of the statement
may be expected to depend. These are Of these, examples are the follows

20
Contents of address
Proposed legal ordinances
for security
for verity — Examples
1 proposed penalty
for falsity or suppression
2 eventual subjection
to oral examination
3 Injunction to state
means of communication
— to give
acknowledgement of receipt
of interrogating paper
5* Statement of excuses if
any for delay or non
responsion

4 Injunction Order to give to
the conveyor information
of the receipt if the
Elicitation paper without waiting
for the time by which the
required Response paper can
be transmitted.
5. For non-transmission or
delay in the transmission of the required Response paper, if any such legitimate cause or <gap/ prevention as may have had place. See Prop. Excuse.


1. Penalty in case of falsity or suppression 1. if wilful or as accompanied
with evil consciousness. 2. if produced by culpable inadvertency
and then by negligence or rashness.
2. Subjection to the eventual reexamination in the
oral form.
3. Injunction Order to add to at the end of his response paper information
of the an assured means of communication with him until by the
the time happening of the conclusion of the oral or some
other event by which the need of communication with him for the purpose
of the suit will have been made to cease



Identifier: | JB/056/223/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-20

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

223

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E6?

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18279

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in