JB/100/185/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/100/185/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/185/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/185/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->17<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Civil</head></p>
 
<p>2.  Finance.  Expence of resulting from excessive<lb/>
 
salaries to public officers, salaries annexed to<lb/>
 
<add>superfluous or</add> useless offices, or <del>sales</del> sinecure, i:e: <add>pensions of favour,</add> salaries<lb/>
without office.</p>
<p>That reform in every one of these instances is<lb/>
desirable is not <add>scarcely</add> to be disputed, that a bar ought<lb/>
to be set up against the granting of pensions of<lb/>
mere favour, and exclusive of or <del><gap/></del> over and above<lb/>
the <del>remuneration due pensioner</del> allowance proper<lb/>
on the score of reward to be allowed to <add>annexed to <gap/></add> service that<lb/>
<add>all</add> sinecures and all offices unless either <del>by</del> <add>in</add> their nature<lb/>
or by their multitude ought to be struck off, and<lb/>
that the quantum of emolument annext to efficient<lb/>
and necessary offices ought to be reduced to the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
quantum of allowance necessary to engage in each<lb/>
branch of <add>public duty functions</add> service the quantum of abilities and<lb/>
other qualifications necessary for the most advantageous<lb/>
discharge of those duties <add>functions</add>.</p>
<p>On the other hand it is not the less true, that<lb/>
whatever portion of such allowance is struck off<lb/>
without the most proper indemnity <add>or any other terms than that of <gap/></add> to the occupant<lb/>
for the time being is not a gain but a loss to the<lb/>
community upon the whole, <del>to have</del> considering <del>the</del> <add>such</add><lb/>
occupant as a part of that of the community, which<lb/>
<del>be</del> <add><del>a</del> it</add> is as much as any other.  It is still the same<lb/>
losing bargain as before, the same inequity of a tax<lb/>
laid exclusively upon one or a few members of the community<lb/>
for the benefit of the rest.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:32, 17 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

17
Civil

2. Finance. Expence of resulting from excessive
salaries to public officers, salaries annexed to
superfluous or useless offices, or sales sinecure, i:e: pensions of favour, salaries
without office.

That reform in every one of these instances is
desirable is not scarcely to be disputed, that a bar ought
to be set up against the granting of pensions of
mere favour, and exclusive of or over and above
the remuneration due pensioner allowance proper
on the score of reward to be allowed to annexed to service that
all sinecures and all offices unless either by in their nature
or by their multitude ought to be struck off, and
that the quantum of emolument annext to efficient
and necessary offices ought to be reduced to the
quantum of allowance necessary to engage in each
branch of public duty functions service the quantum of abilities and
other qualifications necessary for the most advantageous
discharge of those duties functions.

On the other hand it is not the less true, that
whatever portion of such allowance is struck off
without the most proper indemnity or any other terms than that of to the occupant
for the time being is not a gain but a loss to the
community upon the whole, to have considering the such
occupant as a part of that of the community, which
be a it is as much as any other. It is still the same
losing bargain as before, the same inequity of a tax
laid exclusively upon one or a few members of the community
for the benefit of the rest.


Identifier: | JB/100/185/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

100

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

185

Info in main headings field

civil

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d17

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32201

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in