JB/116/299/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/299/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/299/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/299/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>28</head>
<p>every point except that of the authority under which it has<lb/> been done &#x2014; what follows? what would the guilty gain by it? <lb/>
<hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note>Jeopardy <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> re the necessity what it  <gap/> did it apply to</note> Does the necessity apply itself to the subversion of the constitution,<lb/> and the violation of the fundamental laws? &#x2014; Grant that the <lb/>laws that would have been made <del>this</del> last session, if these <lb/>same self-commissioned legislators had taken upon themselves<lb/> during that time the whole of the business of Parliament <lb/> would have been exactly of the same tenor &#x2014; word for word &#x2014; <lb/>as those that actually were made by Parliament. would this<lb/> have afforded the smallest excuse to them for constituting themselves <lb/>sole legislators in contempt of Parliament. &#x2014; </p> 
 
<p>By which of the two opposite views of the matter were<lb/> they led into this contempt? What was their conjecture about <lb/>Parliament? That it would sanction their plans? &#x2014; or that it<lb/> would refuse its sanction to them? &#x2014; In either case their conduct <lb/>is almost equally without excuse. Multiply the apprehended <lb/>mischief a thousand fold &#x2014; call the returning Convicts millions<lb/> instead of thousands &#x2014; what would the excuse be bettered by it? &#x2014; <lb/>not a tittle. &#x2014; Necessity of confining them there? &#x2014; necessity of<lb/> doing what has been done? &#x2014; Be it so: &#x2014; but where was the<lb/> necessity of doing it without Parliament? &#x2014; the same necessity <lb/>exactly as there is for the imposing the taxes of next Session <lb/>without Parliament. Natural necessity (I have admitted it before) <lb/>is a justification: factitious necessity, neither justification, nor<lb/> even excuse, but aggravation: it is the addition of fraud to <lb/>whatever may be the crime attempted to be exercised by it. &#x2014; </p> 
 
<p>On pretence of securing the community against the<lb/> return of those obnoxious members they set on foot a measure &#x2014; <lb/>a measure persevered in for these fourteen years &#x2014; by which<lb/> <add>if</add>
</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

28

every point except that of the authority under which it has
been done — what follows? what would the guilty gain by it?
[+] Jeopardy [+] re the necessity what it did it apply to Does the necessity apply itself to the subversion of the constitution,
and the violation of the fundamental laws? — Grant that the
laws that would have been made this last session, if these
same self-commissioned legislators had taken upon themselves
during that time the whole of the business of Parliament
would have been exactly of the same tenor — word for word —
as those that actually were made by Parliament. would this
have afforded the smallest excuse to them for constituting themselves
sole legislators in contempt of Parliament. —

By which of the two opposite views of the matter were
they led into this contempt? What was their conjecture about
Parliament? That it would sanction their plans? — or that it
would refuse its sanction to them? — In either case their conduct
is almost equally without excuse. Multiply the apprehended
mischief a thousand fold — call the returning Convicts millions
instead of thousands — what would the excuse be bettered by it? —
not a tittle. — Necessity of confining them there? — necessity of
doing what has been done? — Be it so: — but where was the
necessity of doing it without Parliament? — the same necessity
exactly as there is for the imposing the taxes of next Session
without Parliament. Natural necessity (I have admitted it before)
is a justification: factitious necessity, neither justification, nor
even excuse, but aggravation: it is the addition of fraud to
whatever may be the crime attempted to be exercised by it. —

On pretence of securing the community against the
return of those obnoxious members they set on foot a measure —
a measure persevered in for these fourteen years — by which
if




Identifier: | JB/116/299/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

299

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d27 f83 / d28 f84

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37832

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in