★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/505/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/116/505/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>6 Jan<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> 1803</head> | ||
<head>Letter 3</head> | |||
<p><del>By [the once illustrious] Earl</del> <add><del>a minister of former days</del> <add>By the first of his Majesty's peace-makers the Earl</add></add> of Bute, less fortunate <lb/>in his praise than M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Addington, the praise of Paris<lb/> — the most prominent of his <sic>atchievements</sic> <!-- can this be correct? --> — was shown <lb/>for an inscription to his tomb. Two <del><sic>atchievements</sic></del> <add>Acts</add> <lb/> and as yet but two — constitute the <foreign>res gesta</foreign> <add><sic>atchievements</sic> <add>Parliamentary exploits</add></add> of Lord<lb/> Pelham: the <hi rend='underline'>Police-Magistrate Super-<unclear>pensioning</unclear> Act,</hi> <lb/>and the <hi rend='underline'><unclear>Bland</unclear>-Inspectorship Act. </hi> If the time were <lb/>come for bespeaking tomb-stones, which of these rival <lb/>inscriptions would be Lord <sic>Pelhams</sic> desire? — Which <lb/>of them? Alas! talk not of separation: speak of the<lb/> same great design, either without the other would be incompleat. <lb/><add>No:</add> The verses of <gap/> made not so compleat <lb/>a match with <unclear>Marius'</unclear>. We have our Grenville Act: — <lb/>his fame — <del>yet may memory</del> <add>history</add> — <del>let</del> any thing but the <lb/>Statute-book — hand down to posterity <add>the twin statutes —</add> the <hi rend='underline'><foreign>per nobile<lb/> fratrum</foreign></hi> — the two Pelham Acts.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
6 Jany 1803 Letter 3
By [the once illustrious] Earl a minister of former days <add>By the first of his Majesty's peace-makers the Earl</add> of Bute, less fortunate
in his praise than Mr Addington, the praise of Paris
— the most prominent of his atchievements — was shown
for an inscription to his tomb. Two atchievements Acts
and as yet but two — constitute the res gesta atchievements <add>Parliamentary exploits</add> of Lord
Pelham: the Police-Magistrate Super-pensioning Act,
and the Bland-Inspectorship Act. If the time were
come for bespeaking tomb-stones, which of these rival
inscriptions would be Lord Pelhams desire? — Which
of them? Alas! talk not of separation: speak of the
same great design, either without the other would be incompleat.
No: The verses of made not so compleat
a match with Marius'. We have our Grenville Act: —
his fame — yet may memory history — let any thing but the
Statute-book — hand down to posterity the twin statutes — the per nobile
fratrum — the two Pelham Acts.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/505/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1803-01-06 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
505 |
letter 3 |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
38038 |
|||
