JB/116/643/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/643/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/643/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/643/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>63</head><!-- aligned to the right-hand margin, and in pencil -->
<p>£350 a year, a <hi rend='underline'><!-- foreign text checked: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=douceur&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a --><foreign>douceu</foreign>r</hi> for a gentleman &#x2014; for the friend
<lb/>
of the gentleman who does every thing &#x2014; was not to be
<lb/>
made up so easily: a hecatomb, and more than a
<lb/>
hecatomb, of victims was to be sacrificed, before an
<lb/>
offering could be <sic>raind</sic> worthy of the chosen priest,
<lb/>
who was to stretch his hands over the altar, and
<lb/>
make as if he were putting a period to the sacri<add>fice.</add>fice. 
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indented -->In this place, truth compells me to acknowle<del>g</del>dge,
<lb/>
proof that would be termed <hi rend='underline'>legal</hi> fails
<lb/>
me: rumour &#x2014; notoriety &#x2014; whatsoever be the word &#x2014;
<lb/>
is in several points the only ground I can exhibit
<lb/>
even so much as in the way of reference.
<lb/>
I have no eye-witness to depose, that as often as
<lb/>
a Noble Secretary h<del>i</del>as appeared to act, a gentleman
<lb/>
on the other side the wainscoat has pulled the <unclear><sic>wirer</sic></unclear><!-- 'wearer' ? -->.
<lb/>
Friendship between the gentleman who <sic>popp'd</sic> out
<lb/>
of <del>his</del> <add>the</add> pocket, and the gentlemen out of whose
<lb/>
pocket the other popped, is a point not less difficult
<lb/>
to prove, at least by the evidence of sense.
<lb/>
The Nobel Lord and the gentleman on the other
<lb/>
side of the wainscoat could, either of them, by their
<lb/>
evidence put both points out of doubt.  Fortunately
<lb/>
or unfortunately the favourite <del>ma</del> maxim about &#x2014;
<lb/>
self-crimination and self-depredation, the maxim
<lb/>
made to <del>cow</del> <del>cowe</del> cover this and every thing else
<lb/>
that <del>oughr</del> ought to be disclosed, steps in &amp; covers
<lb/>
them: so that on this occasion, as on all others,
<lb/>
they may do exactly as they please.  On these obscure
<lb/>
and delicate points, circumstantial evidence then
<lb/>
is the sole resort: &amp; before the bar of the public at <add>least</add>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:23, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


63

£350 a year, a douceur for a gentleman — for the friend
of the gentleman who does every thing — was not to be
made up so easily: a hecatomb, and more than a
hecatomb, of victims was to be sacrificed, before an
offering could be raind worthy of the chosen priest,
who was to stretch his hands over the altar, and
make as if he were putting a period to the sacrifice.fice.

In this place, truth compells me to acknowlegdge,
proof that would be termed legal fails
me: rumour — notoriety — whatsoever be the word —
is in several points the only ground I can exhibit
even so much as in the way of reference.
I have no eye-witness to depose, that as often as
a Noble Secretary hias appeared to act, a gentleman
on the other side the wainscoat has pulled the wirer.
Friendship between the gentleman who popp'd out
of his the pocket, and the gentlemen out of whose
pocket the other popped, is a point not less difficult
to prove, at least by the evidence of sense.
The Nobel Lord and the gentleman on the other
side of the wainscoat could, either of them, by their
evidence put both points out of doubt. Fortunately
or unfortunately the favourite ma maxim about —
self-crimination and self-depredation, the maxim
made to cow cowe cover this and every thing else
that oughr ought to be disclosed, steps in & covers
them: so that on this occasion, as on all others,
they may do exactly as they please. On these obscure
and delicate points, circumstantial evidence then
is the sole resort: & before the bar of the public at least



Identifier: | JB/116/643/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

643

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d63 / d64

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7, and note 4 to letter 1824, vol. 7

ID Number

38176

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in