JB/116/283/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/283/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/283/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>2 Feb 1803<lb/> Note &#x2014; continued (2 </head>
 
<p>to which by the transportation the Convict may have happened <lb/>to be transported in the first instance, it <del>is</del> <add>was</add> not in its nature<lb/> incapable of being remarked, without the succession of<lb/> the bondage. The bondage in like manner was <lb/> not under this system <hi rend='underline'>incapable</hi> of being <del>rais</del> detached <lb/>from the <del>bondag</del> confinement and remitted by itself <lb/>the confinement continuing <sic>unremitted</sic>: but, <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> as it was only in virtue of the bondage i: e: the profit not made by the Court servant that the Traitor could have any interest in keeping him in any sort of confinement</note> <del>as the individual<lb/> purchaser of the service. the Master of the Convict<lb/> would hav</del> it was not natural that any such separation<lb/> should ever have taken place in practice. </p>
 
<p>Under the new system <del>the Governor of the Colony</del> <lb/>confinement became fixed <del>location </del> to a spot certain, circumscribed by the by the<lb/> courts of the settlement, the Governor &#x2014; now <lb/>an Agent of the Crown, standing in the place of the Master &#x2014; <lb/>the bondage might <del>in consequence</del> by a parochial<lb/> indulgence, declared or undeclared, be remitted, without<lb/> <del>any instrument in </del> <add>the intervention of any </add> formal written instrument, and without the<lb/> remission of the confinement: the confinement might also <lb/>be remitted, and at any time before the expiration of <lb/>the exile, though not without a formal instrument for<lb/> the purpose. </p>
 
<p>Under the old system, the distance of the <del><gap/></del>
<lb/>spot, to which the Convict was to be transported in the first instance,<lb/> made in an indirect way, <add>in most instances, though not necessarily</add> a correspondent addition <lb/>to the duration of the exile. The <add>right to the</add> service of<lb/> the Convict being sold for the whole seven years, if accordingly<lb/> he was kept in bondage in the last day of that seven<lb/> years <del>to</del> <add>it <del>was</del></add> could not <add>even be in his power</add> the day after to find himself the<lb/> day after on British ground so early as the next day.<lb/> He would have to wait in the first place for the sailing <lb/>of a ship bound to <add>a <gap/> port in</add> Great Britain from the <add>spot on</add> Colony in which <lb/> 
<add>the</add>
</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

2 Feb 1803
Note — continued (2

to which by the transportation the Convict may have happened
to be transported in the first instance, it is was not in its nature
incapable of being remarked, without the succession of
the bondage. The bondage in like manner was
not under this system incapable of being rais detached
from the bondag confinement and remitted by itself
the confinement continuing unremitted: but, + + as it was only in virtue of the bondage i: e: the profit not made by the Court servant that the Traitor could have any interest in keeping him in any sort of confinement as the individual
purchaser of the service. the Master of the Convict
would hav
it was not natural that any such separation
should ever have taken place in practice.

Under the new system the Governor of the Colony
confinement became fixed location to a spot certain, circumscribed by the by the
courts of the settlement, the Governor — now
an Agent of the Crown, standing in the place of the Master —
the bondage might in consequence by a parochial
indulgence, declared or undeclared, be remitted, without
any instrument in the intervention of any formal written instrument, and without the
remission of the confinement: the confinement might also
be remitted, and at any time before the expiration of
the exile, though not without a formal instrument for
the purpose.

Under the old system, the distance of the
spot, to which the Convict was to be transported in the first instance,
made in an indirect way, in most instances, though not necessarily a correspondent addition
to the duration of the exile. The right to the service of
the Convict being sold for the whole seven years, if accordingly
he was kept in bondage in the last day of that seven
years to it was could not even be in his power the day after to find himself the
day after on British ground so early as the next day.
He would have to wait in the first place for the sailing
of a ship bound to a port in Great Britain from the spot on Colony in which
the




Identifier: | JB/116/283/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1803-02-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

283

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note continued

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37816

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in