JB/116/603/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/603/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/603/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/603/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>31 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1802</head>
<head>Letter 3</head> <note>{3 XVII Hulks</note><lb/>
<p>[Botany Bay]</p>
<p>Our victuals would do in quantity: but the quality<lb/>
is so bad, and the cooking so nasty, that nothing but<lb/>
climming [starving] can force a man to eat it. We<lb/>
have meat for dinner one day, and bread and cheese<lb/>
the other: boiled barley for breakfast, and burgon for<lb/>
supper: neither, good nor clean: so that they that can<lb/>
get any thing eat but litle of the ship's allowance.<lb/>
This is a very bad place ....It is impossible to live<lb/>
here long.</p>
<p>Well, Sir, but this correspondent of <sic>your's</sic> who is<lb/>
he? "him  of <unclear>miser</unclear> my Lord: <del>but</del> <add>yet</add> not the less but the<lb/>
more credible, <del>for his place unvarnished</del> <add>in his undesigned and artless</add> <unclear>tule.</unclear> <add>[+]1</add> <note><add>[+]</add> Had the person written<lb/>
to been a person from<lb/>
whose interpretation any<lb/>
the faintest hope of relief<lb/>
could have been <del><gap/></del><lb/>
conceived, motives for<lb/>
exaggeration at least<lb/>
if not for absolute<lb/>
untruth might have<lb/>
been imputed, and<lb/>
not altogether without<lb/>
cause.  The fact is &#x2014;<lb/>
<del>that</del> written to a shorter<lb/>
though not companion<lb/>
in affliction, as above<lb/>
described, it fill by mere<lb/>
accident, though not<lb/>
without sufficient authentication,<lb/>
into the hands<lb/>
of a gentleman by<lb/>
whose permission the<lb/>
copy I have (the<lb/>
original <add>having been</add> also in my<lb/>
hands) was obtained.<lb/>
</note></p>
<p>But his name, Sir? &#x2014; To my Lord: there your<lb/>
Lordship will have the goodness to excuse me.  I have<lb/>
read Don Quixote, my Lord: I will not follow his<lb/>
example. The <del>lash</del> <add>scourge</add> of the <del>master</del> <add>tyrant</add> shall not be <del>aggravated</del><add><del>made to</del> brought down</add><lb/>
<add><del>fall</del> with redoubled force </add> <del>upon the back of the eviction</del>, by an interference so<lb/>
powerless on my part, so unefficacious, <add>so much worse than unefficacious</add> elsewhere. To a Committee<lb/>
of the House of Commons <del><gap/></del><add>...</add> Yes my Lord at any<lb/>
time: not to his Majesty's Secretary of State, so long as<lb/>
Lord Pelham continues his Majestys Secretary of State.<lb/>
<del>not to</del>  best of all to the gentleman behind <add><del>on the other side</del></add> the wainscot,<lb/>
so long as he continues on  the other side of the wainscot.<lb/>
of <del>complaint</del> <add><del>frank</del> frank disclosure</add> to Lord Pelham, what <del>would</del><add>could be expected to</add> be the consequence? -<lb/>
Let experience - recent experience - speak.<lb/>
To the Inspector an additional hundred a year to question<lb/>
his exertions: perhaps an assitant or a Deputy, to support<lb/>
him under them.  As to the wretched letter-writer an<lb/>
additional port hole <sic>stopt</sic> up <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> and the <unclear>repose</unclear> of <del>his</del> office <add>[+]2</add> <del>would</del> <note><add>[+]2</add> might be <del>secured</del><add>made</add><lb/>
<add>a secure</add> for ever against all</note><lb/>
<del>not <gap/> be disturbed by any</del> repetition of his impertinence.</p><pb/>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:23, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit 31 Decr 1802 Letter 3 {3 XVII Hulks

[Botany Bay]

Our victuals would do in quantity: but the quality
is so bad, and the cooking so nasty, that nothing but
climming [starving] can force a man to eat it. We
have meat for dinner one day, and bread and cheese
the other: boiled barley for breakfast, and burgon for
supper: neither, good nor clean: so that they that can
get any thing eat but litle of the ship's allowance.
This is a very bad place ....It is impossible to live
here long.

Well, Sir, but this correspondent of your's who is
he? "him of miser my Lord: but yet not the less but the
more credible, for his place unvarnished in his undesigned and artless tule. [+]1 [+] Had the person written
to been a person from
whose interpretation any
the faintest hope of relief
could have been
conceived, motives for
exaggeration at least
if not for absolute
untruth might have
been imputed, and
not altogether without
cause. The fact is —
that written to a shorter
though not companion
in affliction, as above
described, it fill by mere
accident, though not
without sufficient authentication,
into the hands
of a gentleman by
whose permission the
copy I have (the
original having been also in my
hands) was obtained.

But his name, Sir? — To my Lord: there your
Lordship will have the goodness to excuse me. I have
read Don Quixote, my Lord: I will not follow his
example. The lash scourge of the master tyrant shall not be aggravatedmade to brought down
fall with redoubled force upon the back of the eviction, by an interference so
powerless on my part, so unefficacious, so much worse than unefficacious elsewhere. To a Committee
of the House of Commons ... Yes my Lord at any
time: not to his Majesty's Secretary of State, so long as
Lord Pelham continues his Majestys Secretary of State.
not to best of all to the gentleman behind on the other side the wainscot,
so long as he continues on the other side of the wainscot.
of complaint frank frank disclosure to Lord Pelham, what wouldcould be expected to be the consequence? -
Let experience - recent experience - speak.
To the Inspector an additional hundred a year to question
his exertions: perhaps an assitant or a Deputy, to support
him under them. As to the wretched letter-writer an
additional port hole stopt up + and the repose of his office [+]2 would [+]2 might be securedmade
a secure for ever against all

not be disturbed by any repetition of his impertinence.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/116/603/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-12-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

603

Info in main headings field

letter 3

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d20 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7

ID Number

38136

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in