★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
| No edit summary | No edit summary | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
| {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
PROCEDURE 33 §38.
Collusion That Justices may examine do this into with effect the merits of former
 convictions, the following powers seem to be requisite.
1st a Power to examine compel appearance & answers of the delinquent upon Oath
 as also the prior informer whether it was not
 understood between them or whether it was not intended
by the informer that the Penalty  already or when it shall <add>be reviewed</add> or an 
equivalent, adequate or partial,should be given up
 to the delinquent or somebody on his behalf - or to
 some relation or friend of the delinquent, tho' to keep
 for himself, the  which would not have been given to such person had it
---page break---
 
PROCEDURE. Collusion
been for such information?
2nd When the portion penalty is apportioned, part of 
between the  and the informer the  was  collusion can cover but half it is therefore their half only that  
it is secured to the party friend which is shared with by
 the informer:  the runaway part therefore viz the informer's share can alone 
have been protected by the collusion:  it is therefore 
 this informer's share that in such case ought to
be paid over again:  unless it be thought proper that
 his other half should be paid all a second time, by way of 
 punishment.
 should mightbe drawn with this view, which the 
 Justice should be empowered or obliged required to exhibit
 upon a former conviction pleaded, together with 
 such others accommodated to the circumstances of each case as he may think conducive to the discovery
 of the truth: & s so that he may conviction de novo may upon 
 not receiving any answer or an unsatisfactory
 one - as upon non-appearance of the delinquent
 or prior informer after summons  without an excuse. [& in
 somewhat at a I should be left to decide whether this Appeal from an acquital was designed to be given that word might ad of it: on the other hand it is contrary to the general  of the Common Law
 undertaking for a future appearance] verified upon
 oath.
Before conviction or before payment on delivery & which the Information is pending
 The apertory averments Oath may be turned into Promissory.
 After all, it must be left to the discretion of the Justices
 but an Appeal might be given to the 2nd informer: least the
 Justices as it may frequently happen   be also in extension
| Identifier: | JB/095/101/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 095 | |||
| 101 | procedure collusion | ||
| 001 | |||
| text sheet | 1 | ||
| recto | |||
| jeremy bentham | [[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]] | ||
| 30987 | |||