JB/116/022/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/022/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>Panopt. v. N.S. Wales Note to p.4</head>
<head>Panopt. v. N.S. Wales Note to p.4</head>


(a) Policy&#x2014; is I am much mistaken &#x2014; the <del>soundest</del> <add>deepest</add> and<lb/>
<p>(a) Policy&#x2014; is I am much mistaken &#x2014; the <del>soundest</del>
<del>strictest</del> <add><del>surest</del> <add>steadiest</add> policy &#x2014; will be found to <sic>concurr</sic> with the tenderest<lb/>
                    <add>deepest</add> and<lb/>
humanity in regarding the <del>criminal world</del> <add>world of criminality <add>criminal world</add> in this <add>instructive <del>and</del></add> unimpassioned<lb/>
                    <del>strictest</del>
point of view. <del>Insensible to provocative, superior</del> <add><del>In a breast <add>mind</del></add> <add><del>thus</del> prepared &#x2014; thus <add>To an eye thus prepared,</add> <note><del>while fortified against the weakness of <gap/> <add>unless</add> <gap/>, and the weakness of <add><gap/></add> <gap/></del></note><lb/>
                    <add>
<del>to vengeance, the legislator with his <unclear>satellite</unclear> the Judge</del><lb/>
                        <del>surest</del>
<del>will behold with no other</del> <add><del>nothing more</del> in</add> <del><gap/></del> the most <del><gap/></del> <add>profligate</add> offender <note>will present <add>- on the one hand</add> no further object of <del>blind</del> <add>unprofitable</add> resentment &#x2014; <del>no</del> <add>on the other hand, no</add> less <gap/> object of preventive coercion &#x2014; than <del>he</del> would <del>be</del> <unclear>presented</unclear> by</note><lb/>
                        <add>steadiest</add>
<del>will <gap/> forth no other <unclear>instance</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> be produced by</del> <lb/>
                    </add> policy &#x2014; will be found to <sic>concurr</sic> with the
<del><gap/> no other <unclear>mention</unclear> than he would</del> a refractory patient or a<lb/>
                    tenderest<lb/> humanity in regarding the <del>criminal world</del>
forward child. Guided by this analogy, the <unclear>formost</unclear><lb/>
                    <add>world of criminality <add>criminal world</add></add> in this
<gap/>, <hi rend='underline'>death</hi>, has for this five and thirty years appeared<lb/>
                        <add>instructive <del>and</del></add> unimpassioned<lb/> point of view.
to me <del>not <gap/></del> <add>scarce in any degree</add> less absurd (in the cases <add>at least</add> in which it is ordinarily<lb/>
                        <del>Insensible to provocative, superior</del>
applied) in a political than it would be in a medical point<lb/>
                    <del>
of view. In point of fact, nothing that <del><unclear>deacons</unclear></del> can<lb/>
                        <add>In a breast <add>mind</add></add>
with any <add>tolerable</add> propriety <del><gap/></del> <add><unclear>assume</unclear></add> the name of <hi rend='underline'>policy</hi> - not <add><gap/></add> <unclear>name</unclear> - not<lb/>
                    </del>
<add>so much as</add> reflection &#x2014; appears at any time to have been <add>given <add>acted as</add> the efficient cause<lb/>
                    <add><del>thus</del> prepared &#x2014; thus <add>To an eye thus
of the <del>prediliction of</del> <add>a use so abundently made of</add> it: <del>Passion at the outset</del> <add>Vengeance &#x2014; <add>Passion &#x2014;</add> <add>began the <unclear>practice</unclear>;</add> <gap/> <del>and prejudice</del> <add>prejudice, the result of</add><lb/>
                        prepared,</add></add>
<del><gap/> to have <gap/> it was <gap/></del> has <del>all along continued</del> <add>persevered in</add> it,</p>
                    <note>
                        <del>while fortified against the weakness of <gap/>
                            <add>unless</add>
                            <gap/>, and the weakness of <add>
                                <gap/>
                            </add>
                            <gap/></del>
                    </note><lb/>
                    <del>to vengeance, the legislator with his <unclear>satellite</unclear> the
                        Judge</del><lb/>
                    <del>will behold with no other</del>
                    <add><del>nothing more</del> in</add>
                    <del>
                        <gap/>
                    </del> the most <del>
                        <gap/>
                    </del>
                    <add>profligate</add> offender <note>will present <add>- on the one hand</add>
                        no further object of <del>blind</del>
                        <add>unprofitable</add> resentment &#x2014; <del>no</del>
                        <add>on the other hand, no</add> less <gap/> object of preventive coercion
                        &#x2014; than <del>he</del> would <del>be</del>
                        <unclear>presented</unclear> by</note><lb/>
                    <del>will <gap/> forth no other <unclear>instance</unclear>
                        <gap/>
                        <gap/> be produced by</del>
                    <lb/>
                    <del><gap/> no other <unclear>mention</unclear> than he would</del> a refractory
                    patient or a<lb/> forward child. Guided by this analogy, the <unclear>formost</unclear><lb/>
                    <gap/>, <hi rend="underline">death</hi>, has for this five and thirty years
                    appeared<lb/> to me <del>not <gap/></del>
                    <add>scarce in any degree</add> less absurd (in the cases <add>at least</add> in
                    which it is ordinarily<lb/> applied) in a political than it would be in a
                    medical point<lb/> of view. In point of fact, nothing that <del>
                        <unclear>deacons</unclear>
                    </del> can<lb/> with any <add>tolerable</add> propriety <del>
                        <gap/>
                    </del>
                    <add>
                        <unclear>assume</unclear>
                    </add> the name of <hi rend="underline">policy</hi> - not <add>
                        <gap/>
                    </add>
                    <unclear>name</unclear> - not<lb/>
                    <add>so much as</add> reflection &#x2014; appears at any time to have been
                        <add>given <add>acted as</add></add> the efficient cause<lb/> of the
                        <del>prediliction of</del>
                    <add>a use so abundently made of</add> it: <del>Passion at the outset</del>
                    <add>Vengeance &#x2014; <add>Passion &#x2014;</add></add>
                    <add>began the <unclear>practice</unclear>;</add>
                    <gap/>
                    <del>and prejudice</del>
                    <add>prejudice, the result of</add><lb/>
                    <del><gap/> to have <gap/> it was <gap/></del> has <del>all along continued</del>
                    <add>persevered in</add> it,</p>  






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Panopt. v. N.S. Wales Note to p.4

(a) Policy— is I am much mistaken — the soundest deepest and
strictest surest <add>steadiest </add> policy — will be found to concurr with the tenderest
humanity in regarding the criminal world world of criminality <add>criminal world</add> in this instructive and unimpassioned
point of view. Insensible to provocative, superior In a breast <add>mind</add> thus prepared — thus <add>To an eye thus prepared,</add> while fortified against the weakness of unless , and the weakness of
to vengeance, the legislator with his satellite the Judge
will behold with no other nothing more in the most profligate offender will present - on the one hand no further object of blind unprofitable resentment — no on the other hand, no less object of preventive coercion — than he would be presented by
will forth no other instance be produced by
no other mention than he would a refractory patient or a
forward child. Guided by this analogy, the formost
, death, has for this five and thirty years appeared
to me not scarce in any degree less absurd (in the cases at least in which it is ordinarily
applied) in a political than it would be in a medical point
of view. In point of fact, nothing that deacons can
with any tolerable propriety assume the name of policy - not name - not
so much as reflection — appears at any time to have been given <add>acted as</add> the efficient cause
of the prediliction of a use so abundently made of it: Passion at the outset Vengeance — <add>Passion —</add> began the practice; and prejudice prejudice, the result of
to have it was has all along continued persevered in it,




Identifier: | JB/116/022/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

022

Info in main headings field

panopt. v. n. s. wales note to p. 4

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37555

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in