★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- NB: delete tags have been added to the middle section of the folio which has been deleted vertically, together with comment tags (added at the beginning and end of the section) with comments in capitals to identify them easier. Remove the comment tags (and the delete tags as necessary, if you do not wish them to show up in the finished production of the folio). --> | |||
<head>24 July 1802</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil --> | |||
<head>N. S. Wales <note>Conduct</note></head><!-- roughly centred, and in pencil --> | |||
<p>This distraction between human beings on the one | <head>3 <note>111 Non-<gap/><!-- looks like 'exist' -->-proved</note><!-- in pencil --></head> | ||
<p><!-- indented -->This distraction between human beings on the one | |||
<lb/> | |||
hand, and stocks and stones in the other, I can not | |||
<lb/> | |||
help looking upon, my Lord, as a distraction that | |||
<lb/> | |||
has its ground in nature, [and common sense.] Unfortunately | |||
<lb/> | |||
to this <gap/> it never seems to have made <add>obtained</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
its way to <add>entrance into</add> the minds of lawyers. If it had, either | |||
<lb/> | |||
they must have agreed from first to last on denying | |||
<lb/> | |||
Clark's case to be law — or <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add> from the first <gap/><!-- looks like 'rain' or 'vain'? --> to starting of the question of the <sic>Kings</sic> right of legislation over Colonies, mediately or immediately makes no sort of difference —</note> they must have agreed in | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable. | |||
<lb/> | |||
If it <unclear>find</unclear> it | |||
<lb/> | |||
could never have entered into their conception that <del>the</del> | |||
<lb/> | |||
it was in the power of the King by confederating <add>a confederacy</add> with | |||
<lb/> | |||
a part of his subjects <del>going</del> withdrawing themselves | |||
<lb/> | |||
for this purpose to a distant country, remote from the | |||
<lb/> | |||
eye of Parliament, to oust Parliament <del><gap/></del> <del>of its legislative</del> <add>of its right of</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>powers over them</del> <add>legislating <del>over</del> <add>upon</add> them</add> <del>to withdraw them out of <add>the</add></del> <add>I mean as was meant in Clark's case</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due</del> <add>not the <hi rend='underline'>concurrent</hi> divinity but the exclusive right,</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>were made by him with or without their concurrence by | |||
<lb/> | |||
them with or without his concurrence</del> If it had, it | |||
<lb/> | |||
could as more Laws entered into their conception that it | |||
<lb/> | |||
was on the power of the King in confederacy with a thousand | |||
<lb/> | |||
of his subjects collected all over the kingdom from | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>different</del> <add>various</add> towns and places including or not including | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> Alban's, to set up a right of legislating without | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
Parliament, by going out of England <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add> to Virginia or Maryland</note> then <del>over</del> <add>in confederacy with</add> a thousand | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
of his subjects collected in S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> <sic>Albans</sic> and still staying <add>continuing</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
in S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> Alban's. | |||
<lb/></p> | <lb/></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
24 July 1802 N. S. Wales Conduct
3 111 Non--proved
This distraction between human beings on the one
hand, and stocks and stones in the other, I can not
help looking upon, my Lord, as a distraction that
has its ground in nature, [and common sense.] Unfortunately
to this it never seems to have made obtained
its way to entrance into the minds of lawyers. If it had, either
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
Clark's case to be law — or [+] [+] from the first to starting of the question of the Kings right of legislation over Colonies, mediately or immediately makes no sort of difference — they must have agreed in
looking upon it as untenable.
If it find it
could never have entered into their conception that the
it was in the power of the King by confederating a confederacy with
a part of his subjects going withdrawing themselves
for this purpose to a distant country, remote from the
eye of Parliament, to oust Parliament of its legislative of its right of
powers over them legislating over <add>upon them</add> to withdraw them out of the I mean as was meant in Clark's case
no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due not the concurrent divinity but the exclusive right,
were made by him with or without their concurrence by
them with or without his concurrence If it had, it
could as more Laws entered into their conception that it
was on the power of the King in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected all over the kingdom from
different various towns and places including or not including
St Alban's, to set up a right of legislating without
Parliament, by going out of England [+] [+] to Virginia or Maryland then over in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected in St Albans and still staying continuing
in St Alban's.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-24 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
146 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37679 |
|||
