★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>4</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil --> | <head>4</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil --> | ||
<p><!-- indented --><note>Accommodation Appeal | <p><!-- indented --><note>Accommodation Appeal retrograde</note><!-- note in pencil --> Why try new establishments when the tried ones | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
promise so much better? What have the Committee | promise so much better? What have the Committee | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
to say against the | to say against the Consular jurisdiction. | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
I have looked at it , and from all I | I have looked at it, and from all I | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
can find concerning it , it sums<!-- though could be 'seems' --> perfection itself | can find concerning it, it sums<!-- though could be 'seems' --> perfection itself | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
in comparison of <del>any</del> all the systems that | in comparison of <del>any</del> all the systems that | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
surround and cramp it . It has too many | surround and cramp it. It has too many | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
Judges by all that are above one : it were easy | Judges by all that are above one: it were easy | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
to strike off all that are above one . It has no | to strike off all that are above one. It has no | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
appeals above it : it were easy to give it appeals . | appeals above it: it were easy to give it appeals. | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
It has not <add>so much</add> publicity <del | <note>Duty sensible, in spite of Montesquieu <del>Duty sensible</del> of the importance of uniformity, they yet suffer their uniformity to be deformed by this <unclear><sic>ireveracnce</sic></unclear></note> It has not <add>so much</add> publicity <del>once</del> as were to be wished: | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
it were easy to give it more . It is in good < | it were easy to give it more. It is in good <unclear>odour</unclear>, | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
I conceive <add>it should seem</add> with the public : for the Committee, | I conceive <add>it should seem</add> with the public: for the Committee, | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
though not ill-disposed to abrogation <del>will not</del> <add>do not</add> | though not ill-disposed to abrogation <del>will not</del> <add>do not</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>venture</del> <add>choose</add> to abrogate it . I <hi rend='underline'>wil</hi>l venture — why? | <del>venture</del> <add>choose</add> to abrogate it. I <hi rend='underline'>wil</hi>l venture — why? | ||
<lb/> | |||
because my mode <add>system</add> of procedure is the same | |||
<lb/> | |||
with the procedure <add>system</add> observed there, I will have | |||
<lb/> | |||
none <add>no one</add> of my Courts a Consular Court — why? | |||
<lb/> | |||
because they are all Consular. In a Consular | |||
<lb/> | |||
Court I see a real Reconciliation-Office without | |||
<lb/> | |||
the name. | |||
<lb/></p> | <lb/></p> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 51: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
4
Accommodation Appeal retrograde Why try new establishments when the tried ones
promise so much better? What have the Committee
to say against the Consular jurisdiction.
I have looked at it, and from all I
can find concerning it, it sums perfection itself
in comparison of any all the systems that
surround and cramp it. It has too many
Judges by all that are above one: it were easy
to strike off all that are above one. It has no
appeals above it: it were easy to give it appeals.
Duty sensible, in spite of Montesquieu Duty sensible of the importance of uniformity, they yet suffer their uniformity to be deformed by this ireveracnce It has not so much publicity once as were to be wished:
it were easy to give it more. It is in good odour,
I conceive it should seem with the public: for the Committee,
though not ill-disposed to abrogation will not do not
venture choose to abrogate it. I will venture — why?
because my mode system of procedure is the same
with the procedure system observed there, I will have
none no one of my Courts a Consular Court — why?
because they are all Consular. In a Consular
Court I see a real Reconciliation-Office without
the name.
|
Identifier: | JB/051/225/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
|
225 |
|||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / d2 / d3 / d4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
16390 |
|||
