JB/098/039/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/098/039/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/098/039/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/098/039/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>30.</head>
<head>C</head>
<head>Of Compensation.</head>
 
<head>Why the Right of receiving Compensation<lb/>is made extinguishable by Lapse of Time.</head>
 
<head>Reasons.</head>
 
<p><note>1. After a certain time, not to receive it is no hardship --</note><lb/>
1. Because the forbearance of the party damnified for<lb/>such a length of time shows, that either he never had a wish<lb/>to receive compensation, or that if he ever had one, that wish<lb/><note>No -- but it may <sic>shew</sic> his inability to prosecute</note><lb/>is at an end: in either of which cases the taking away his<lb/>right would be no hardship to him.</p>
 
<p><note>2 -- To pay it, is</note>
<lb/>
2. Because the author of the damage will by the above<lb/>considerations be led to conclude that the party damnified<lb/>means not to prosecute his right. He will accordingly<lb/>no longer be prepared for the event of suffering that inconvenience.<lb/>If then contrary to his expectation it should<lb/><sic>befal</sic> him, the weight of it will fall on him with double<lb/>force.</p>
 
<p>3. Because</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:13, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

30. C Of Compensation.

Why the Right of receiving Compensation
is made extinguishable by Lapse of Time.

Reasons.

1. After a certain time, not to receive it is no hardship --
1. Because the forbearance of the party damnified for
such a length of time shows, that either he never had a wish
to receive compensation, or that if he ever had one, that wish
No -- but it may shew his inability to prosecute
is at an end: in either of which cases the taking away his
right would be no hardship to him.

2 -- To pay it, is
2. Because the author of the damage will by the above
considerations be led to conclude that the party damnified
means not to prosecute his right. He will accordingly
no longer be prepared for the event of suffering that inconvenience.
If then contrary to his expectation it should
befal him, the weight of it will fall on him with double
force.

3. Because




Identifier: | JB/098/039/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 98.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

098

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

039

Info in main headings field

of compensation

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f29 / f30 / f31 / f32

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31647

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in