JB/050/073/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/073/001: Difference between revisions

Jmcress (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/073/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/073/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>LAW &amp; COMMON STATUTE &#x2014;Decisions all particular. No General Rule Exists</head>
<lb/><p>In a word to <unclear>commons</unclear> an illustration from Nature <gap/><gap/> [a natural way]. A Decision formed on a Statute is a ray of light <unclear>its</unclear> <unclear>way</unclear> from the Statute as it's Radical. A Decision </p>


<head>LAW &amp; COMMON STATUTE &#x2014;Decisions all particular. No General Rule <hi rend="underline">exists</hi></head>


<p>In a word to borrow an illustration from Natural<lb/> Philosophy [a material image]. A Decision<lb/> founded on a Statute is a ray of light issuing<lb/> from the Statute as <sic>it's</sic> <add>true</add> Radiant. A Decision<lb/> founded upon Common Law is a ray issuing<lb/> an imaginary <add><gap/></add> rule, which <add>we may term</add> its false Radiant.</p>
<note>The effect of it<lb/>
is always to declare</note>
<note>+ mentioned in the directory part</note>
<note>+ had been praedicated<lb/>
therein as about<lb/>
to be made <add>consequent</add> attendant<lb/>
in every individual <lb/>
future instance<lb/>
(pardon &amp; so forth excepted)<lb/>
<del>as a consequence</del>.</note>
<p>A decision grounded upon a Statute always declaims that the fact in question is <del>a genus</del> <add>an individual</add><lb/>
of that <del>genus</del> <add>species</add> of facts<add>+</add> on which <add>as a species of offence species of punishment</add> the penalty<lb/>
of the Statute<lb/> (supposing it to be one of a particular kind)</p>
<p>The specific rule therefore <lb/>
([or rather the generic, to speak with more perspicuity<lb/>
tho' less precision]) that is the preposition <lb/>
predicating these two specific ideas <add>of offence &amp; punishment</add> one <lb/>
as consequent upon the other exists: it<lb/>
has been formed by the proper authority, clothed<lb/>
in certain language, and that language<lb/>
fixed by certain permanent material marks, the<lb/>
letters upon a <add>like</add> permanent <add>material</add> substraturm, the<lb/>
paper&#x2014;in a word it is a written Law.<lb/>
When the decision is grounded upon the Common<lb/>
Law that is upon prior decisions,<add>+</add> no such<lb/>
rule exists. It is a <add>fiction</add> figment of the imagination<lb/>
The decision is "<hi rend="underline">quasi</hi>" from such<lb/>
a rule&#x2014;<del>A rule is supposed which is a <add>No such <gap/> for the purpose</add></del><lb/>
No such rule can exist because there is no<lb/>
specific idea<lb/>
comprized in [the terms of] the<lb/>
decision. Every decision is particular, <gap/><lb/>
upon the particular fact which called<lb/>
for it&#x2014;The numerical rule, is a rule which<lb/>
is supposed, a <add>mere</add> figment of the imagination raised<lb/>
by abstraction, on the one hand from <del>the</del> <add>a <gap/></add><lb/>
particular fact on the other from a particular<lb/>
punishment connected with it, in the manner <lb/>
we have mentioned.</p>
<p>and of that language<lb/>
<del>the object of <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>the impact of raising</del><lb/>
making expression has been made permanent<lb/>
&amp; the object of <gap/><lb/>
charged from the<lb/>
ear to the eye by &amp;</p>
<p><add>+</add> For <add>a decision upon</add> Custom stands<lb/>
<add>perhaps</add> upon another footing<lb/>
and decisions upon<lb/>
<add>other</add> authorities <del><gap/> upon<lb/>
another</del> as Treatise which<lb/>
are <gap/> evidence of<lb/>
lost decisions, unlitigated<lb/>
practise &amp;c <add>again</add> upon<lb/>
another.</p>
<p>Law Common X<lb/>
Statute</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule exists

In a word to borrow an illustration from Natural
Philosophy [a material image]. A Decision
founded on a Statute is a ray of light issuing
from the Statute as it's true Radiant. A Decision
founded upon Common Law is a ray issuing
an imaginary rule, which we may term its false Radiant.

The effect of it
is always to declare

+ mentioned in the directory part

+ had been praedicated
therein as about
to be made consequent attendant
in every individual
future instance
(pardon & so forth excepted)
as a consequence.

A decision grounded upon a Statute always declaims that the fact in question is a genus an individual
of that genus species of facts+ on which as a species of offence species of punishment the penalty
of the Statute
(supposing it to be one of a particular kind)

The specific rule therefore
([or rather the generic, to speak with more perspicuity
tho' less precision]) that is the preposition
predicating these two specific ideas of offence & punishment one
as consequent upon the other exists: it
has been formed by the proper authority, clothed
in certain language, and that language
fixed by certain permanent material marks, the
letters upon a like permanent material substraturm, the
paper—in a word it is a written Law.
When the decision is grounded upon the Common
Law that is upon prior decisions,+ no such
rule exists. It is a fiction figment of the imagination
The decision is "quasi" from such
a rule—A rule is supposed which is a No such for the purpose
No such rule can exist because there is no
specific idea
comprized in [the terms of] the
decision. Every decision is particular,
upon the particular fact which called
for it—The numerical rule, is a rule which
is supposed, a mere figment of the imagination raised
by abstraction, on the one hand from the a
particular fact on the other from a particular
punishment connected with it, in the manner
we have mentioned.

and of that language
the object of
the impact of raising
making expression has been made permanent
& the object of
charged from the
ear to the eye by &

+ For a decision upon Custom stands
perhaps upon another footing
and decisions upon
other authorities upon
another
as Treatise which
are evidence of
lost decisions, unlitigated
practise &c again upon
another.

Law Common X
Statute



Identifier: | JB/050/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

073

Info in main headings field

law common & statute - decisions all particular - no general rule exists

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16064

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in