★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/073/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/050/073/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule | |||
< | <head>LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule <hi rend="underline">exists</hi></head> | ||
< | |||
<p>In a word to borrow an illustration from Natural<lb/> Philosophy [a material image]. A Decision<lb/> founded on a Statute is a ray of light issuing<lb/> from the Statute as <sic>it's</sic> <add>true</add> Radiant. A Decision<lb/> founded upon Common Law is a ray issuing<lb/> an imaginary <add><gap/></add> rule, which <add>we may term</add> its false Radiant.</p> | |||
<note>The effect of it<lb/> | |||
is always to declare</note> | |||
<note>+ mentioned in the directory part</note> | |||
<note>+ had been praedicated<lb/> | |||
therein as about<lb/> | |||
to be made <add>consequent</add> attendant<lb/> | |||
in every individual <lb/> | |||
future instance<lb/> | |||
(pardon & so forth excepted)<lb/> | |||
<del>as a consequence</del>.</note> | |||
<p>A decision grounded upon a Statute always declaims that the fact in question is <del>a genus</del> <add>an individual</add><lb/> | |||
of that <del>genus</del> <add>species</add> of facts<add>+</add> on which <add>as a species of offence species of punishment</add> the penalty<lb/> | |||
of the Statute<lb/> (supposing it to be one of a particular kind)</p> | |||
<p>The specific rule therefore <lb/> | |||
([or rather the generic, to speak with more perspicuity<lb/> | |||
tho' less precision]) that is the preposition <lb/> | |||
predicating these two specific ideas <add>of offence & punishment</add> one <lb/> | |||
as consequent upon the other exists: it<lb/> | |||
has been formed by the proper authority, clothed<lb/> | |||
in certain language, and that language<lb/> | |||
fixed by certain permanent material marks, the<lb/> | |||
letters upon a <add>like</add> permanent <add>material</add> substraturm, the<lb/> | |||
paper—in a word it is a written Law.<lb/> | |||
When the decision is grounded upon the Common<lb/> | |||
Law that is upon prior decisions,<add>+</add> no such<lb/> | |||
rule exists. It is a <add>fiction</add> figment of the imagination<lb/> | |||
The decision is "<hi rend="underline">quasi</hi>" from such<lb/> | |||
a rule—<del>A rule is supposed which is a <add>No such <gap/> for the purpose</add></del><lb/> | |||
No such rule can exist because there is no<lb/> | |||
specific idea<lb/> | |||
comprized in [the terms of] the<lb/> | |||
decision. Every decision is particular, <gap/><lb/> | |||
upon the particular fact which called<lb/> | |||
for it—The numerical rule, is a rule which<lb/> | |||
is supposed, a <add>mere</add> figment of the imagination raised<lb/> | |||
by abstraction, on the one hand from <del>the</del> <add>a <gap/></add><lb/> | |||
particular fact on the other from a particular<lb/> | |||
punishment connected with it, in the manner <lb/> | |||
we have mentioned.</p> | |||
<p>and of that language<lb/> | |||
<del>the object of <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del>the impact of raising</del><lb/> | |||
making expression has been made permanent<lb/> | |||
& the object of <gap/><lb/> | |||
charged from the<lb/> | |||
ear to the eye by &</p> | |||
<p><add>+</add> For <add>a decision upon</add> Custom stands<lb/> | |||
<add>perhaps</add> upon another footing<lb/> | |||
and decisions upon<lb/> | |||
<add>other</add> authorities <del><gap/> upon<lb/> | |||
another</del> as Treatise which<lb/> | |||
are <gap/> evidence of<lb/> | |||
lost decisions, unlitigated<lb/> | |||
practise &c <add>again</add> upon<lb/> | |||
another.</p> | |||
<p>Law Common X<lb/> | |||
Statute</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule exists
In a word to borrow an illustration from Natural
Philosophy [a material image]. A Decision
founded on a Statute is a ray of light issuing
from the Statute as it's true Radiant. A Decision
founded upon Common Law is a ray issuing
an imaginary rule, which we may term its false Radiant.
The effect of it
is always to declare
+ mentioned in the directory part
+ had been praedicated
therein as about
to be made consequent attendant
in every individual
future instance
(pardon & so forth excepted)
as a consequence.
A decision grounded upon a Statute always declaims that the fact in question is a genus an individual
of that genus species of facts+ on which as a species of offence species of punishment the penalty
of the Statute
(supposing it to be one of a particular kind)
The specific rule therefore
([or rather the generic, to speak with more perspicuity
tho' less precision]) that is the preposition
predicating these two specific ideas of offence & punishment one
as consequent upon the other exists: it
has been formed by the proper authority, clothed
in certain language, and that language
fixed by certain permanent material marks, the
letters upon a like permanent material substraturm, the
paper—in a word it is a written Law.
When the decision is grounded upon the Common
Law that is upon prior decisions,+ no such
rule exists. It is a fiction figment of the imagination
The decision is "quasi" from such
a rule—A rule is supposed which is a No such for the purpose
No such rule can exist because there is no
specific idea
comprized in [the terms of] the
decision. Every decision is particular,
upon the particular fact which called
for it—The numerical rule, is a rule which
is supposed, a mere figment of the imagination raised
by abstraction, on the one hand from the a
particular fact on the other from a particular
punishment connected with it, in the manner
we have mentioned.
and of that language
the object of
the impact of raising
making expression has been made permanent
& the object of
charged from the
ear to the eye by &
+ For a decision upon Custom stands
perhaps upon another footing
and decisions upon
other authorities upon
another as Treatise which
are evidence of
lost decisions, unlitigated
practise &c again upon
another.
Law Common X
Statute
|
Identifier: | JB/050/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
050 |
procedure code |
||
|
073 |
law common & statute - decisions all particular - no general rule exists |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]] |
||
|
16064 |
|||
