JB/050/008/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/008/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>JURISDICTION of APPEAL. v. III /f2.</head>
<head>JURISDICTION of APPEAL. v. III /f2.</head>


<p><add>Should always be given - <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></add> <note><!-- note crossed through --><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> omitted in <gap/> Par. 2. 24 ss 46. Excise in II <unclear>Burn</unclear> 28.] in <gap/> Justices to Qu. <unclear>Sep</unclear> tho' <unclear>given</unclear> from <gap/></note>
<p><add>Should always be given - <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></add> <note><!-- note crossed through --><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> omitted in <gap/> Par. 2. 24 § 46. Excise in II Burn 28.] in <gap/> Justices to Qu. <unclear>Sep</unclear> tho' given from <gap/></note>
1 Limitation of Time. <foreign>extat speciatim</foreign></p>
1 Limitation of Time. <foreign>extat speciatim</foreign></p>


<p>2. To proceed on the merits. <del><gap/> <gap/></del> &#x2014; The form to be<lb/>
<p>2. To proceed on the merits. <del>&amp; not</del> &#x2014; The form to be<lb/>
amendable - <foreign>extat generatim</foreign>. G.2. c. .v. <foreign>Polychrista <add>inventa</add>.</foreign> <lb/></p>
amendable - <foreign>extat generatim</foreign>. G.2. c. .v. <foreign>Polychrista <add>inventa</add>.</foreign> <lb/></p>


<p>3. Evidence fresh whether admissible or no. <foreign><gap/></foreign> <lb/>
<p>3. Evidence fresh whether admissible or no. <foreign>semble</foreign> <lb/>
<foreign>que non</foreign>. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>
<foreign>que non</foreign>. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> But this precludes it from the advantage of a <gap/> <del>which</del> <add>or no</add> it were <hi rend='underline'>New Trial</hi> which might be expedient sometimes, as in case of forthcomingness of a Witness not before obtainable v. Divinity&#x2014; As <unclear>imparting censure</unclear> the original Judge it not proper- <gap/> as <unclear>revisory</unclear>.</note>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> But this precludes it from the advantage of a <gap/> <del>which</del> <add>or no</add> it were <hi rend='underline'>New Trial</hi> which might be expedient sometimes, as in case of forthcomingness of a Witness not before obtainable v. Divinity&#x2014; As imparting censure the original Judge it not proper- <gap/> as <unclear>revisory</unclear>.</note>
Shaw Excise. 367.</p>
Shaw Excise. 367.</p>


Line 20: Line 20:
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days<lb/>
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days<lb/>
notice <add>&amp;</add> if there be <add>not</add> that interval then to go over to<lb/>
notice <add>&amp;</add> if there be <add>not</add> that interval then to go over to<lb/>
the next Sessions &#x2014; <foreign><unclear>semble</unclear> que</foreign> it should not be<lb/>
the next Sessions &#x2014; <foreign>semble que</foreign> it should not be<lb/>
put off so long as there may be that distance between<lb/>
put off so long as there may be that distance between<lb/>
the date of the Notice &amp; the last day of the Sessions.</p>
the date of the Notice &amp; the last day of the Sessions.</p>
Line 36: Line 36:


<p>6. Deposit. <hi rend='superscript'>++</hi>  
<p>6. Deposit. <hi rend='superscript'>++</hi>  
<note><hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> <del>15. C 2. 1.11. ss19. Excise</del></note></p>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> <del>15. C 2. 1.11. §19. Excise</del></note></p>


<p>7. Costs. <foreign><unclear>exstat speciatium</unclear></foreign>- Double <add><unclear>mistrial</unclear></add> by 15. C.2. 11 ss19.</p>  
<pb/>
 
<p>7. Costs. <foreign>exstat speciatium</foreign>- Double <add><unclear>mistrial</unclear></add> by 15. C.2. 11 ss19.</p>  


<head>FORMULAE</head>
<head>FORMULAE</head>
Line 47: Line 49:
form a border to the paper.</p>
form a border to the paper.</p>


<p><head><foreign>RECORDIATO Sive INSINUATIO</foreign> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></head>
<head><foreign>RECORDIATO Sive INSINUATIO</foreign> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></head>
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <!-- paper folded, parts of words missing --><gap/> <gap/> we have <unclear>not</unclear> of own we must be content to borrow from our neighbours.</note></p>
<p><note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <!-- paper folded, parts of words missing --><gap/> <gap/> we have <unclear>not</unclear> of own we must be content to borrow from our neighbours.</note></p>


<head>EVIDENCE</head>
<head>EVIDENCE</head>
Line 61: Line 63:
<head><add><del>Apprehensi</del></add> SEIZURE and APPREHENSION</head>
<head><add><del>Apprehensi</del></add> SEIZURE and APPREHENSION</head>
<p><note><del>In</del>Under this head are considerable. 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> The person who may seize  2. the Object that may be <hi rend='underline'>seized</hi>. That of <gap/> is either. The person of the offender. <unclear>3</unclear>. The goods which <gap/> subject of the <gap/> <gap/> other goods <gap/> <gap/> 25 <gap/></note>
<p><note><del>In</del>Under this head are considerable. 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> The person who may seize  2. the Object that may be <hi rend='underline'>seized</hi>. That of <gap/> is either. The person of the offender. <unclear>3</unclear>. The goods which <gap/> subject of the <gap/> <gap/> other goods <gap/> <gap/> 25 <gap/></note>
<lb/>
Real or X Personal = Seizure<lb/>
Real or X Personal = Seizure<lb/>
Seizure- <del><unclear>Official</unclear> X</del> or Peculiar X. Private or<lb/>
Seizure- <del>Official X</del> or Peculiar X. Private or<lb/>
General<lb/>
General<lb/>
<foreign><unclear>Procedendae</unclear></foreign> in Personal v. G <del><gap/></del> Turnpike Act.<lb/>
<foreign><unclear>Procedendae</unclear></foreign> in Personal v. G <del><gap/></del> Turnpike Act.<lb/>
7 G.2. 40- Specimen <foreign><unclear>deficiens</unclear></foreign>. <add><unclear>Burn</unclear></add> Exc. p.62. n<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 25<lb/>
7 G.2. 40- Specimen <foreign><unclear>deficiens</unclear></foreign>. <add><unclear>Burn</unclear></add> Exc. p.62. n<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 25<lb/>
<add>from</add> Stat. 9. G.2. 35. ss20.<lb/>
<add>from</add> Stat. 9. G.2. 35. §20.<lb/>
The Magistrate to proceed to the <hi rend='underline'>merits</hi> without inquiring<lb/>
The Magistrate to proceed to the <hi rend='underline'>merits</hi> without inquiring<lb/>
into the manner or form of seizure. <gap/> G.2. 35 ss34 <del><gap/></del></p>
into the manner or form of seizure. <gap/> G.2. 35 §34 <del><gap/></del></p>
<pb/>
<pb/>


<p>WIFE v. Str. 1121. in Burn Excise 135. <unclear>R</unclear>.<hi rend='superscript'><del><gap/></del></hi> v-<unclear>Cross</unclear><lb/>
<p>WIFE v. Str. 1121. in Burn Excise 135. R.<hi rend='superscript'><del><gap/></del></hi> v-Cross<lb/>
1. Husband whether responsible for offence? <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi><lb/>  
1. Husband whether responsible for <add>her</add> offence? <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi><lb/>  
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <unclear>Ass</unclear>. p 1 <unclear>Hawk</unclear>. 3 but only his own opinion.</note></p>  
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <unclear>Ass</unclear>. p 1 <unclear>Hawk</unclear>. 3 but only his own opinion.</note></p>  


<p>2 If so, then according to legal Ideas, not <del>only <gap/></del> <add><unclear>the</unclear></add><lb/>
<p>2 If so, then according to legal Ideas, not <del>only <gap/></del> <add><unclear>the</unclear></add><lb/>
she only but <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> also (contrary to what might be<lb/>
she only but <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> also (contrary to what might be<lb/>
the general notion) should be summon'd to defend<lb/></p>
the general notion) should be <sic>summon'd</sic> to defend<lb/></p>


<p>3. Is she or he liable then to the <unclear><sic>succedaneous</sic></unclear><lb/>
<p>3. Is she or he liable then to the <sic>succedaneous</sic><lb/>
Punishment for want of distrainables.</p>  
Punishment for want of distrainables.</p>  


Line 103: Line 106:
has at least an equal effect in the light<lb/>
has at least an equal effect in the light<lb/>
of an example is least detrimental to the<lb/>
of an example is least detrimental to the<lb/>
affairs of the family, which commonly <unclear>depend</unclear><lb/>
affairs of the family, which commonly depend<lb/>
upon the Husband principally for subsistance
upon the Husband principally for subsistence
<note>The apparent suffering (which is that that does the business of the Law) is <del>less in <unclear>this case</unclear></del> at least equal in this case to what it is in the other: <del><gap/></del> the real, less.</note></p>
<lb/>
<note>The apparent suffering (which is that that does the business of the Law) is <del>less in <unclear>this case</unclear></del> at least equal in this case to what it is in the other: <del>&amp;</del> the real, less.</note></p>
<pb/>
<pb/>


<p>It is easier to meet <add>get</add> with a <del>female</del> <add><unclear>friend</unclear></add> of the female <gap/><lb/>
<p><note>For this same reason The offices of the Wife are easiest supplied. [since there are more women to be met with who are at <gap/> to . . . for a time; than men</note>
<lb/>
It is easier to meet <add>get</add> with a <del>female</del> <add>friend</add> of the female <gap/><lb/>
to<del> manage</del> <add>supply the <gap/> of the wife and the management of</add> the domestic concerns of <del>a</del> <add><del>the</del></add> family,<lb/>
to<del> manage</del> <add>supply the <gap/> of the wife and the management of</add> the domestic concerns of <del>a</del> <add><del>the</del></add> family,<lb/>
than <del>of the male</del> to supply that of the Husband<lb/>
than <del>of the male</del> to supply that of the Husband<lb/>
Line 131: Line 137:
Instances of it are <del>III G.2. 3 <gap/> ss</del> 4. against <gap/>-<gap/></p><!-- line across paqe -->
Instances of it are <del>III G.2. 3 <gap/> ss</del> 4. against <gap/>-<gap/></p><!-- line across paqe -->


Obstruction of..<lb/>
<p>Obstruction of..<lb/>
is an act of<lb/>
is an act of<lb/>
<sic>Accomplicity</sic> after<!-- next two sentences bracketed alongside --><lb/>
<sic>Accomplicity</sic> after<!-- next two sentences bracketed alongside --><lb/>
<unclear>Inchoate</unclear> - Penalty equal to <add>that of</add> consummate -<lb/>
<unclear>Inchoate</unclear> - Penalty equal to <add>that of</add> consummate -<lb/>
shoulf be less.<lb/>
should be less.<lb/>
Consummate - Penalty 1/3 of that of the original<lb/>
Consummate - Penalty 1/3 of that of the original<lb/>
should be equal with discharge<lb/>
should be equal with discharge<lb/>
<add><unclear>of</unclear> reimbursement</add> perhaps of a moiety on <unclear>recapture</unclear><lb/>
<add>of reimbursement</add> perhaps of a moiety on recapture<lb/>
of the original offender: &amp; of more<lb/>
of the original offender: &amp; of more<lb/>
<unclear>but</unclear> payment of the penalty of the<lb/>
but payment of the penalty of the<lb/>
original offence  
original offence</p>
 
   
   




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE Summary. Course delineated. JURISDICTION of APPEAL. v. III /f2.

Should always be given - + + omitted in Par. 2. 24 § 46. Excise in II Burn 28.] in Justices to Qu. Sep tho' given from 1 Limitation of Time. extat speciatim

2. To proceed on the merits. & not — The form to be
amendable - extat generatim. G.2. c. .v. Polychrista inventa.

3. Evidence fresh whether admissible or no. semble
que non. + + But this precludes it from the advantage of a which or no it were New Trial which might be expedient sometimes, as in case of forthcomingness of a Witness not before obtainable v. Divinity— As imparting censure the original Judge it not proper- as revisory. Shaw Excise. 367.

4. Notice 1st to be in writting- 2d The time between that &
the proceeding viz. between that & the commencement of the Sessions.
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days
notice & if there be not that interval then to go over to
the next Sessions — semble que it should not be
put off so long as there may be that distance between
the date of the Notice & the last day of the Sessions.

5. Whether permissible from an acquittal-?
semble que yes - on security given for double
Costs out of pocket taxable by the Sessions & mitigable
But an acquittal of which a copy
might be made grantable should be a bar against
another original Information.. Tho' indeed the power
which seems to be lost of recommencing an information is
only analogous to the power in regular
civil actions of suffering a rather
than an adverse verdict.

6. Deposit. ++ ++ 15. C 2. 1.11. §19. Excise


---page break---

7. Costs. exstat speciatium- Double mistrial by 15. C.2. 11 ss19.

FORMULAE

That the printed forms contain not only
the general matters with blanks for the such matters
as are particular to the case in hand but also directions
for the filling up such blanks, printed so as to
form a border to the paper.

RECORDIATO Sive INSINUATIO +

+ we have not of own we must be content to borrow from our neighbours.

EVIDENCE

In the following cases the Magistrate to transport
himself to the residence of the Witness.
1st In case of the Witness's being under
Imprisonment - where the Justice has no power to remove him. 2dy In case of his being
of a certain quality - As if he be a Peer
Judge. Member of either House of Parliament Knight of any
Order Privy Counsellor

Apprehensi SEIZURE and APPREHENSION

InUnder this head are considerable. 1st The person who may seize 2. the Object that may be seized. That of is either. The person of the offender. 3. The goods which subject of the other goods 25
Real or X Personal = Seizure
Seizure- Official X or Peculiar X. Private or
General
Procedendae in Personal v. G Turnpike Act.
7 G.2. 40- Specimen deficiens. Burn Exc. p.62. no 25
from Stat. 9. G.2. 35. §20.
The Magistrate to proceed to the merits without inquiring
into the manner or form of seizure. G.2. 35 §34


---page break---

WIFE v. Str. 1121. in Burn Excise 135. R. v-Cross
1. Husband whether responsible for her offence? +
+ Ass. p 1 Hawk. 3 but only his own opinion.

2 If so, then according to legal Ideas, not only the
she only but he also (contrary to what might be
the general notion) should be summon'd to defend

3. Is she or he liable then to the succedaneous
Punishment for want of distrainables.

4. By Common Law this would be determined
from considering whether the Imprisonment
was designed (& this might appear variously
in various offences) as a means of compelling
the payment of the fine, or as a substantive
punishment. + + but v. III Bl. Consm 414.

5. But the most expedient way of ordering
by Statute would be, that the Wife should
suffer it
1st To avoid the apparent injustice of a
vicarious distribution
2dly That the check restraint may be applied to operate on
the same person as the temptation; which
in every case but that of a strict union of
affections between the married pair is absolutely
necessary: 3dly That the imprisonment of the wife, which
has at least an equal effect in the light
of an example is least detrimental to the
affairs of the family, which commonly depend
upon the Husband principally for subsistence
The apparent suffering (which is that that does the business of the Law) is less in this case at least equal in this case to what it is in the other: & the real, less.


---page break---

For this same reason The offices of the Wife are easiest supplied. [since there are more women to be met with who are at to . . . for a time; than men
It is easier to meet get with a female friend of the female
to manage supply the of the wife and the management of the domestic concerns of a the family,
than of the male to supply that of the Husband
by furnishing it with the means of
subsistence.

COSTS ferenda generally & of course by the
Informer
SUMMONS
SERVICE{
Personal
At the House{
Dwelling-house
Shop.

Summons
or Warrant?}
Summons is to ground conviction, and
intended merely as notice
Warrant answers a double purpose: the former, & is to secure forthcoming
in case of viz: after conviction for defect of responsibility
Instances of it are III G.2. 3 ss 4. against -

Obstruction of..
is an act of
Accomplicity after
Inchoate - Penalty equal to that of consummate -
should be less.
Consummate - Penalty 1/3 of that of the original
should be equal with discharge
of reimbursement perhaps of a moiety on recapture
of the original offender: & of more
but payment of the penalty of the
original offence




Identifier: | JB/050/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

008

Info in main headings field

procedure summary. course delineated

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15999

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in