★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/198/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/107/198/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>29 Jan<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> 1809</head> | ||
<head>Strictures on Paleys Net</head> | |||
<head>1</head> | |||
<p>Objection - The end<lb/> | |||
aimed at by the laws,<lb/> | |||
claims consideration & | |||
a mitigation of the<lb/> | |||
above censure. <add>p. <!-- gap -->.</add></p> | |||
<head>2</head> | |||
<p>Answer. — The original<lb/> | |||
disease viz the severity<lb/> | |||
of the laws being<lb/> | |||
<sic>removeable</sic> no justification<lb/> | |||
can be found for<lb/> | |||
<del>the</del> continuing the <sic>superadded</sic> disease that<lb/> | |||
has been applied by way<lb/> | |||
of remedy. <add>p. <!-- gap -->.</add></p> | |||
<head>3.</head> | |||
<p>Repeal being practicable<lb/> | |||
no use in encouraging —<lb/> | |||
1. Perjury in Jurymen<lb/> | |||
2. Subornation of Jurymen. <add>p.<!-- gap --></add></p> | |||
<head>4</head> | |||
<p>Reasons are thus dispensed<lb/> | |||
with, & arbitrary<lb/> | |||
apologists are fostered &<lb/> | |||
encouraged. <add>p.<!-- gap --></add></p> | |||
<head>5</head> | |||
<p>Wrong is impossible &<lb/> | |||
praise certain. <add>p.<!-- gap --></add></p> | |||
<p>6</p> | |||
<p>And human life<lb/> | |||
becomes the sport of<lb/> | |||
hypocrisy & venality. <add>p.<!-- gap --></add></p> <pb/> | |||
<head>1.</head> | |||
<p>Objection. If this censure<lb/> | |||
were just it would be<lb/> | |||
impossible to do right</p> | |||
<head>2</head> | |||
<p>Answer. Yes as long<lb/> | |||
as the existing alleviation<lb/> | |||
viz. ex-</p> <pb/> | |||
<head>1</head> | |||
<p>The proportional<lb/> | |||
number of instances in<lb/> | |||
which the laws in question<lb/> | |||
are executed is<lb/> | |||
very small, and self-delusion<lb/> | |||
represents it<lb/> | |||
as smaller than it is.<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> <unclear>per</unclear> lawyers, capital<lb/> | |||
and not capital<lb/> | |||
(<gap/> <unclear>in effect</unclear>) is the only<lb/> | |||
distinction malefactors<lb/> | |||
apprehend <unclear>& remember</unclear><lb/> | |||
<unclear>Hence to make</unclear> a law<lb/> | |||
known it is necessary to<lb/> | |||
make it capital</p> | |||
<head>2</head> | |||
<p>The law would decide<lb/> | |||
once for all. Judges<lb/> | |||
&c <unclear>then</unclear> could agree to<lb/> | |||
consider the matter afresh<lb/> | |||
each time. each time<lb/> | |||
each person deciding<lb/> | |||
perhaps by a different<lb/> | |||
rule</p> | |||
<head>3</head> | |||
<p><del><gap/></del> The conclusion. <foreign><gap/></foreign><lb/> | |||
<foreign><unclear>legislates, qui</unclear> <gap/></foreign><lb/> | |||
<foreign>judice relinquit</foreign>:<lb/> | |||
<foreign><unclear>optimus judice</unclear></foreign><lb/> | |||
<foreign>qui <gap/> <gap/></foreign></p> | |||
<head>4</head> | |||
<p>Page 20. In a <gap/>?<lb/> | |||
<unclear>number the</unclear> instances<lb/> | |||
<unclear>in which</unclear> (page 780)<lb/> | |||
he himself undertakes<lb/> | |||
<unclear>to give a</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>of proper</unclear><lb/> | |||
<gap/>.</p> <pb/> | |||
<head>Recapitulation</head> | |||
<p>I. <gap/> in theory<lb/> | |||
1. That <hi rend='underline'>not</hi> general <gap/><lb/> | |||
but particular <unclear>vengeance</unclear><lb/> | |||
<unclear>or rather its</unclear> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
(for <hi rend='underline'><unclear>vengeance</unclear></hi> supposes <gap/><lb/> | |||
<hi rend='underline'><unclear>offence</unclear></hi>) is the proper<lb/> | |||
ground and <unclear>occasion</unclear><lb/> | |||
of punishment></p> | |||
<!-- Gap in column --><head>II. Errors in respect of <unclear>fail</unclear></head> | |||
<p>1. That the existing congress<lb/> | |||
of human laws is <add>have been</add> the work<lb/> | |||
of design. <unclear>i.e.</unclear> <add><gap/></add> <gap/><lb/> | |||
comprehensive design, <gap/><lb/> | |||
the whole together.<lb/> | |||
He who should attempt it<lb/> | |||
would be branded as a <gap/><lb/> | |||
<unclear>or as a</unclear> <gap/>.</p> | |||
<p>2. That the <unclear>lot of</unclear> <gap/><lb/> | |||
under the law depends <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> <gap/> <unclear>after</unclear> the<lb/> | |||
<hi rend='underline'><unclear>mind</unclear></hi> on which it is <unclear>found</unclear><lb/> | |||
to depend <add>p. 41.</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
29 Jany 1809 Strictures on Paleys Net
1
Objection - The end
aimed at by the laws,
claims consideration &
a mitigation of the
above censure. p. .
2
Answer. — The original
disease viz the severity
of the laws being
removeable no justification
can be found for
the continuing the superadded disease that
has been applied by way
of remedy. p. .
3.
Repeal being practicable
no use in encouraging —
1. Perjury in Jurymen
2. Subornation of Jurymen. p.
4
Reasons are thus dispensed
with, & arbitrary
apologists are fostered &
encouraged. p.
5
Wrong is impossible &
praise certain. p.
6
And human life
becomes the sport of
hypocrisy & venality. p.
---page break---
1.
Objection. If this censure
were just it would be
impossible to do right
2
Answer. Yes as long
as the existing alleviation
viz. ex-
---page break---
1
The proportional
number of instances in
which the laws in question
are executed is
very small, and self-delusion
represents it
as smaller than it is.
per lawyers, capital
and not capital
( in effect) is the only
distinction malefactors
apprehend & remember
Hence to make a law
known it is necessary to
make it capital
2
The law would decide
once for all. Judges
&c then could agree to
consider the matter afresh
each time. each time
each person deciding
perhaps by a different
rule
3
The conclusion.
legislates, qui
judice relinquit:
optimus judice
qui
4
Page 20. In a ?
number the instances
in which (page 780)
he himself undertakes
to give a of proper
.
---page break---
Recapitulation
I. in theory
1. That not general
but particular vengeance
or rather its
(for vengeance supposes
offence) is the proper
ground and occasion
of punishment>
II. Errors in respect of fail
1. That the existing congress
of human laws is have been the work
of design. i.e.
comprehensive design,
the whole together.
He who should attempt it
would be branded as a
or as a .
2. That the lot of
under the law depends
after the
mind on which it is found
to depend p. 41.
|
Identifier: | JB/107/198/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1809-01-29 |
1-6, 1-2, 1-4 |
||
|
107 |
law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net) |
||
|
198 |
strictures on paley's net |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d6 |
||
|
iping 1804 |
|||
|
bernardino rivadavia |
|||
|
1804 |
|||
|
35189 |
|||
