JB/107/253/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/253/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1809</head>
<head>Peines</head>
 
<p>This has been seen a sermon exactly in the state of<lb/>
Dr Paley's: without any differences, unless it be that of a <lb/>
still stronger appearance <add>characteristic</add> of being in earnest. In design...<lb/>
<add>but</add> away with the inquiry - it is neither capable of being ascertained <lb/>
nor worth <add>the trouble</add> ascertaining:- introducing, what?<lb/>
to remove the disease <add>mischief</add>? - No - <add>not an atom of it. <add>not a hairs breadth</add></add> but to confirm and<lb/>
aggravate it.</p>
 
<p>1.It tends to <del>produce</del> <add>This it does in several ways &#x2014;</add> to understand <add>create presume and confirm in the minds of</add><lb/>
1. It gives the unharmed - and among them the legislature<lb/>
at large that <add>the <unclear>writing</unclear> <add>to understand</add></add> whatever mischief has place, results<lb/>
<del>from</del> not from the introduction of a principle radically<lb/>
<sic>vitious</sic> and flagitious, but from the <add>unguarded application and </add> over extensive<lb/>
of a principle <add>in itself</add> rational and favourable to justice:- <lb/>
as who should say <add>as of a physician of the body natural should take up the <gap/> and say</add> - The foul disease is a habit of body<lb/>
which every man who would live in good health might to<lb/>
make it his business to contract. But <del>should</del> by "<hi rend="underline">strictness</hi>"<lb/>
or "<hi rend="underline">overeasiness</hi>" or "<hi rend="underline">nicety</hi>" should it happen to him to let<lb/>
it run on till his nose or any other part drops off, it will<lb/>
in that case have grown to be " a blemish and inconvenience'.<lb/>
then, when the time is come for <unclear>pathos</unclear> <add>and for <unclear>purity</unclear></add>  - adding and concluding <lb/>
- and his physician will be "<hi rend="underline">reproached</hi>", and <lb/>
his "<hi rend="underline">God dishonoured</hi>" by it.</p>
 
<p>2. It tends to propagate a corruption <add>notion</add> or at least a way<lb/>
of speaking &#x2014; which <add>by them</add> to whom political corruption in any shape<lb/>
is a source of advantage <add>a</add> <add> profit in any shape</add> is <del>so</del> with so much facility<lb/>
and complacency taken up - viz. that when a corrupt<lb/>
practice has taken out <add>established</add> in the system, the way to rid the<lb/>
system of the mischief of it is - not to eradicate <add>root it out</add> it, but<lb/>
to let it stay <add>in</add> and <hi rend="underline">preach</hi> at it: as if when a patient <add><del>who</del></add>, by<lb/>
following such advice as the men of law has never <unclear>used</unclear> <unclear>&amp;</unclear> give<lb/>
to the legislator, found his nose in danger, the proper <del>course for</del><add>remedy</add> <del>him</del> <note><del>him to take</del> were declared to be - not a course of mercury, or whatsoever <del>substitute</del> every eligible specific may <del>have been</del><add>be in use</add> but a chapter out of D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Sardinier</unclear> or a few pages <add>page or</add> of <unclear>Fracassoricis</unclear></note></p>
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:18, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Feby 1809 Peines

This has been seen a sermon exactly in the state of
Dr Paley's: without any differences, unless it be that of a
still stronger appearance characteristic of being in earnest. In design...
but away with the inquiry - it is neither capable of being ascertained
nor worth the trouble ascertaining:- introducing, what?
to remove the disease mischief? - No - not an atom of it. <add>not a hairs breadth</add> but to confirm and
aggravate it.

1.It tends to produce This it does in several ways — to understand create presume and confirm in the minds of
1. It gives the unharmed - and among them the legislature
at large that the writing <add>to understand</add> whatever mischief has place, results
from not from the introduction of a principle radically
vitious and flagitious, but from the unguarded application and over extensive
of a principle in itself rational and favourable to justice:-
as who should say as of a physician of the body natural should take up the and say - The foul disease is a habit of body
which every man who would live in good health might to
make it his business to contract. But should by "strictness"
or "overeasiness" or "nicety" should it happen to him to let
it run on till his nose or any other part drops off, it will
in that case have grown to be " a blemish and inconvenience'.
then, when the time is come for pathos and for purity - adding and concluding
- and his physician will be "reproached", and
his "God dishonoured" by it.

2. It tends to propagate a corruption notion or at least a way
of speaking — which by them to whom political corruption in any shape
is a source of advantage a profit in any shape is so with so much facility
and complacency taken up - viz. that when a corrupt
practice has taken out established in the system, the way to rid the
system of the mischief of it is - not to eradicate root it out it, but
to let it stay in and preach at it: as if when a patient who, by
following such advice as the men of law has never used & give
to the legislator, found his nose in danger, the proper course forremedy him him to take were declared to be - not a course of mercury, or whatsoever substitute every eligible specific may have beenbe in use but a chapter out of Dr Sardinier or a few pages page or of Fracassoricis





Identifier: | JB/107/253/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

253

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e52

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35244

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in