JB/100/092/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/100/092/002: Difference between revisions

Cshancock (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>Composition <del>and Promulgation</del></head>
<head>Composition <del>and Promulgation</del></head>


<p>from vague report or from the reformation of the<lb/>
<p>from vague report or from the representation of the<lb/>
 
Judge. As the Judges or <del>the persons</del> <add> of all persons in authority those only any</add> to whose notice<lb/>
judge. If the Judges or <del>the jurors</del> <add> if all jurors in authority <gap/></add> to whom <unclear>
the exigences resulting from such incidents <add>are surely</add> present<lb/>  
 
themselves, so are the person who are <del>most</del> likely<lb/>
<sic>ustice</sic></unclear><lb/>
the exigences resulting from such incidents <add>an<gap/></add> present<lb/>  
 
themselves, so are the just ones who are <del>most</del> likely<lb/>
 
to understand best what regulations will the most<lb/>
to understand best what regulations will the most<lb/>
 
proper to <add>make</add> provision for those exigencies. <del>It is from</del><lb/>
proper to <add>make</add> provision for their exigencies. <del>It is from</del><lb/>
<del>the Judges there The Legislator therefore would</del> To<lb/>
 
<del>the Judges there the Legislation therefore would</del> to<lb/>
 
all Judges therefore a power ought to be given<lb/>
all Judges therefore a power ought to be given<lb/>
 
of proposing regulations of Procedure.</p>
of proposing regulations of Procedure.<lb/></p>
   
   
<p>First <add>to</add> no Judge nor <add>to</add> any Court ought <del>to have</del><lb/>
<p>But <add>to</add> no Judge nor <add>to</add> any Court ought <del>to have</del><lb/>
 
<note>1- On account of <lb/>
<note>1- On account of subordination</note> the power to be convicted of giving a defunctive<lb/>
Subordination</note> the power to be committed of giving a definitive<lb/>
 
authority to any <del>permanent</del> such regulations, any<lb/>
authority to any <del><gap/></del> such regulations, any<lb/>
 
more than to any other regulations of a general<lb/>
more than to any other regulations of a general<lb/>
 
and permanent nature. It would at any rate be an<lb/>
and permanent nature. It could at any <gap/> be an<lb/>
encroach<del>ing</del><add>ment</add> upon <add>the province of the Legislator,</add> and it might be employed in <del>the</del><lb/>
 
<del>subversion of the</del> <add>counteracting his</add> authority. <del>of the Legislator</del>. <add>Thus</add> By requiring, <lb/>
encroaching must <add>when the power of the Legislator</add> and it might be conveyed in <del>the</del><lb/>
for instance more witnesses than they can<lb/>
 
well <add>be likely</add> furnish, or by admitting <del>of</del> delay after delay, <lb/>
<del><gap/> of the</del> authority. <del>of the Legislator</del>. <add>Then</add> By re-<lb/>
quiring, for instance more witnesses than they can<lb/>
 
will <add>be likely</add> punish, or by admitting of delay after delay, <lb/>
 
or by heaping <sic>expence</sic> upon <sic>expence</sic>, a <del>Judge</del> <add>Court</add> <lb/>
or by heaping <sic>expence</sic> upon <sic>expence</sic>, a <del>Judge</del> <add>Court</add> <lb/>
 
<del>might</del> of Justice might render any <del>or</del> act unpunishable<lb/>
<del>might</del> of Justices might render any <del><gap/></del> act unpunishable<lb/>
which the Legislator had thought proper to constitute<lb/>
 
an offence.</p><pb/>
which the Legislator had thought proper to con-<lb/>
 
-<gap/>an offence.<lb/></p>
   
   


Line 55: Line 35:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:14, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

C Composition and Promulgation

from vague report or from the representation of the
Judge. As the Judges or the persons of all persons in authority those only any to whose notice
the exigences resulting from such incidents are surely present
themselves, so are the person who are most likely
to understand best what regulations will the most
proper to make provision for those exigencies. It is from
the Judges there The Legislator therefore would To
all Judges therefore a power ought to be given
of proposing regulations of Procedure.

But to no Judge nor to any Court ought to have
1- On account of
Subordination
the power to be committed of giving a definitive
authority to any permanent such regulations, any
more than to any other regulations of a general
and permanent nature. It would at any rate be an
encroachingment upon the province of the Legislator, and it might be employed in the
subversion of the counteracting his authority. of the Legislator. Thus By requiring,
for instance more witnesses than they can
well be likely furnish, or by admitting of delay after delay,
or by heaping expence upon expence, a Judge Court
might of Justice might render any or act unpunishable
which the Legislator had thought proper to constitute
an offence.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/100/092/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

11

Box

100

Main Headings

Folio number

092

Info in main headings field

conservation and improvement

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

/ f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

richard smith

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32108

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in