★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/044/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '[{{fullurl:JB/041/044/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1825. Nov. 27 28. 1826 Nov. 4<lb/> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> Copied and Copy corrected.<lb/> | |||
<note>Ch. Judge Deputes permanent<lb/> | |||
§. 2. Relation to Judge</note></p> | |||
<p><hi rend="underline">Enactive, Ratiocinative and Instructional</hi><lb/> | |||
Art. 12. <del>After</del> As <del><gap/> case</del> where <del>the Suit is commenced</del><lb/> | |||
before the Judge principal, so <del><gap/> case</del> where it is<lb/> | |||
<del>commenced</del> before a Judge Depute permanent <add>that the suit has been commenced</add>, after the original<lb/> | |||
<del><add>enquiry or say</add> examination, as</del> a recapitulatory enquiry <del>or say<lb/> | |||
examination</del> will <add><del><gap/></del></add> have place, in any of the cases mentioned<lb/> | |||
in Ch. XVI. Quasi-Jury. §. 1. 1.<hi rend="underline">Fields of Service</hi>. <del>In that case to</del> <add>On this <del><gap/> occasion</del></add> | |||
<del>obviation</del> <add>second</add> enquiry the Judge should in general be the same as on<lb/> | |||
<del>that</del> the <del>benefit the advantage afforded by the <gap/> of <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del>of evidence resulting from the presentation of the evidence which</del> <add>the first: because to any second Judge the evidence, <del><gap/></del> that had</add><lb/> | |||
<del>from the presenting <add>to the mind of the Judge</add> on the second examination in a shape inferior <add>less apt</add></del> <add>been <unclear>checked</unclear> on the first enquiry <del><gap/></del> can not otherwise present <del>other</del> itself in the most apt shape.</add><lb/> | |||
<del><add><gap/> be itself apt</add> to the best the condition in which it by the first situation being the<lb/> | |||
<add>Judge by whom</add> be recapitulatory enquiry <add>as <gap/> is taken</add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> be the Judge<lb/> | |||
Depute permanent before by whom the original examination<lb/> | |||
was likewise that if for</del> <add>Nevertheless for preponderant</add> reasons assigned, <del>the <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>the</add> Judge<lb/> | |||
Depute permanent may, <add>on this occasion, of his own motion,</add> transmitt the <del>demand</del> recapitulatory<lb/> | |||
<del>examination</del> <add>enquiry</add> from himself to the Judge principal, who in <del>this</del> <add>such</add><lb/> | |||
case will <del><gap/></del> either perform <del><gap/></del> <add>the enquiry</add> himself, or transmitt it to <del><gap/></del> <add>some</add><lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> other <add>one of his</add> Judge Deputes permanent: and <del>without <gap/> assigned<lb/> | |||
any party may</del> on the application of any party,<lb/> | |||
with or without reason assigned, it will in like manner<lb/> | |||
be transmitted to the Judge principal. But, in this case, it<lb/> | |||
will be for the Judge principal to consider, whether <del>it <gap/></del> <add>the application had</add> not<lb/> | |||
<del>for the express purpose</del> <add>for its cause that <del><gap/></del> a hope entertained,</add> of the deception, capable of being produced<lb/> | |||
by the <del><gap/> exhibition of <gap/></del> comparatively unapt shape of<lb/> | |||
the <add>first <unclear>edition</unclear> of the</add> evidence, and if yes, to declare such his opinion or<lb/> | |||
suspicion, and act accordingly on the occasion of his decrees.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1825. Nov. 27 28. 1826 Nov. 4
Constitutional Code. Copied and Copy corrected.
Ch. Judge Deputes permanent
§. 2. Relation to Judge
Enactive, Ratiocinative and Instructional
Art. 12. After As case where the Suit is commenced
before the Judge principal, so case where it is
commenced before a Judge Depute permanent that the suit has been commenced, after the original
enquiry or say examination, as a recapitulatory enquiry or say
examination will have place, in any of the cases mentioned
in Ch. XVI. Quasi-Jury. §. 1. 1.Fields of Service. In that case to On this occasion
obviation second enquiry the Judge should in general be the same as on
that the benefit the advantage afforded by the of
of evidence resulting from the presentation of the evidence which the first: because to any second Judge the evidence, that had
from the presenting to the mind of the Judge on the second examination in a shape inferior less apt been checked on the first enquiry can not otherwise present other itself in the most apt shape.
be itself apt to the best the condition in which it by the first situation being the
Judge by whom be recapitulatory enquiry as is taken be the Judge
Depute permanent before by whom the original examination
was likewise that if for Nevertheless for preponderant reasons assigned, the the Judge
Depute permanent may, on this occasion, of his own motion, transmitt the demand recapitulatory
examination enquiry from himself to the Judge principal, who in this such
case will either perform the enquiry himself, or transmitt it to some
other one of his Judge Deputes permanent: and without assigned
any party may on the application of any party,
with or without reason assigned, it will in like manner
be transmitted to the Judge principal. But, in this case, it
will be for the Judge principal to consider, whether it the application had not
for the express purpose for its cause that a hope entertained, of the deception, capable of being produced
by the exhibition of comparatively unapt shape of
the first edition of the evidence, and if yes, to declare such his opinion or
suspicion, and act accordingly on the occasion of his decrees.
Identifier: | JB/041/044/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-11-27 |
|||
041 |
Constitutional Code |
||
044 |
Constitutional Code |
||
001 |
Enactive - Ratiocinative and Instructional |
||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D6 / E5 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
[[notes_public::Copied and Copy corrected [note in Bentham's hand]]] |
001 |
||