★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 12. <gap/> Written</head> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code</head> | |||
<note>Ch.XII. Judiciary Collectively</note><lb/> | |||
<note>S.1. Preliminary Explanation</note> | |||
<p>1.</p> | |||
<p>Astonishment and indignation<lb/> the sentiments<lb/> this Code will<lb/>excite on the part of<lb/> judicial expectants.</p> | |||
<p>2.</p> | |||
<p>The cause, that these<lb/> Codes made for the<lb/> greatest number —<lb/> the justiciables not<lb/> for judges alone.</p> | |||
<p>3.</p> | |||
<p>Existing Codes made<lb/> by lawyers for the benefit<lb/> of lawyers.</p> | |||
<p>4.</p> | |||
<p>Objection-persons<lb/> will not be found<lb/> to accept an office<lb/> thus headed with burthens.<lb/>Answer. Offices far<lb/> more burthensome, accepted<lb/> by great numbers,<lb/> and eagerly sought<lb/> for.</p> | |||
<p>5.</p> | |||
<p>Acceptance of office<lb/> as these terms a<lb/> greater proof of appropriate<lb/> aptitude, than<lb/> a boasting and pretended<lb/> indignant<lb/> rejection.</p> | |||
<p>6.</p> | |||
<p>Non-acceptance a<lb/> proof of inaptitude.</p> | |||
<p>7.</p> | |||
<p>In England, enormity<lb/> of lawyer's emolument<lb/> held up as a reason<lb/> for corresponding enormity<lb/> in judge's<lb/> emoluments.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>8.</p> | |||
<p>In Proposed Codes,<lb/> the grand demand<lb/> for appropriate knowledge<lb/> on the part of<lb/> judges done away by<lb/> the substitution of<lb/> zeal to fictitious law.</p> | |||
<p>9.</p> | |||
<p>Under proposed Codes<lb/> care taken that Judge, <lb/> in pursuing his own<lb/> interest, may meet<lb/> with effectual obstruction<lb/> in opposing the <lb/> greatest happiness of<lb/> the greatest number.</p> | |||
<p>10.</p> | |||
<p>That, for the accommodation<lb/> of a single<lb/> individual, persons<lb/> in any number sh<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/> at all times be in<lb/> attendance, is not<lb/> thought extraordinary.</p> | |||
<p>11.</p> | |||
<p>So for private individuals,<lb/> accommodation<lb/> to be had for ordinary<lb/> remuneration<lb/> on all days, at all<lb/> times.</p> | |||
<p>12.</p> | |||
<p>Yet, (with narrow exceptions)<lb/> no law ever<lb/> made for providing<lb/> justice at all times<lb/> for the millions.</p> | |||
<p>13.</p> | |||
<p>End aimed at by these<lb/> Codes, different from<lb/> ends aimed at by all<lb/> other bodies of law, <lb/> Anglo-American U.S.<lb/> alone excepted.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>14.</p> | |||
<p>Judicial establishment:<lb/> its intimate connection<lb/> with Procedure.</p> | |||
<p>15.</p> | |||
<p>Ends aimed at by both, <lb/> maximization of public <lb/> benefit, and rendering<lb/> adequate the functionaries<lb/> employed.</p> | |||
<p>16.</p> | |||
<p>A difficulty presents<lb/> itself, the vexation<lb/> and expense <gap/><lb/> attending the<lb/> pursuit as well as<lb/> defence of a suit.</p> | |||
<p>17.</p> | |||
<p>Thence the entering<lb/> in a suit the means<lb/> of inflicting evil on<lb/> the atagonist.</p> | |||
<p>18.</p> | |||
<p>Remedy, the subjecting<lb/> the author of such <lb/> evil to pecuniary loss.</p> | |||
<p>19.</p> | |||
<p>No system of judicature<lb/> hitherto established<lb/> has had justice<lb/> for its object.</p> | |||
<p>20.</p> | |||
<p>& there had been such,<lb/> it would have rendered<lb/> <sic>compleat</sic> the services<lb/> of the Minister<lb/> of Justice.</p> | |||
<p>21.</p> | |||
<p>So it would have avoided,<lb/> with the most <lb/>scrupulous care, all<lb/> factitious delay, vexation<lb/> and expense.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1827. Novr. 12. Written
Constitutional Code
Ch.XII. Judiciary Collectively
S.1. Preliminary Explanation
1.
Astonishment and indignation
the sentiments
this Code will
excite on the part of
judicial expectants.
2.
The cause, that these
Codes made for the
greatest number —
the justiciables not
for judges alone.
3.
Existing Codes made
by lawyers for the benefit
of lawyers.
4.
Objection-persons
will not be found
to accept an office
thus headed with burthens.
Answer. Offices far
more burthensome, accepted
by great numbers,
and eagerly sought
for.
5.
Acceptance of office
as these terms a
greater proof of appropriate
aptitude, than
a boasting and pretended
indignant
rejection.
6.
Non-acceptance a
proof of inaptitude.
7.
In England, enormity
of lawyer's emolument
held up as a reason
for corresponding enormity
in judge's
emoluments.
---page break---
8.
In Proposed Codes,
the grand demand
for appropriate knowledge
on the part of
judges done away by
the substitution of
zeal to fictitious law.
9.
Under proposed Codes
care taken that Judge,
in pursuing his own
interest, may meet
with effectual obstruction
in opposing the
greatest happiness of
the greatest number.
10.
That, for the accommodation
of a single
individual, persons
in any number shd.
at all times be in
attendance, is not
thought extraordinary.
11.
So for private individuals,
accommodation
to be had for ordinary
remuneration
on all days, at all
times.
12.
Yet, (with narrow exceptions)
no law ever
made for providing
justice at all times
for the millions.
13.
End aimed at by these
Codes, different from
ends aimed at by all
other bodies of law,
Anglo-American U.S.
alone excepted.
---page break---
14.
Judicial establishment:
its intimate connection
with Procedure.
15.
Ends aimed at by both,
maximization of public
benefit, and rendering
adequate the functionaries
employed.
16.
A difficulty presents
itself, the vexation
and expense
attending the
pursuit as well as
defence of a suit.
17.
Thence the entering
in a suit the means
of inflicting evil on
the atagonist.
18.
Remedy, the subjecting
the author of such
evil to pecuniary loss.
19.
No system of judicature
hitherto established
has had justice
for its object.
20.
& there had been such,
it would have rendered
compleat the services
of the Minister
of Justice.
21.
So it would have avoided,
with the most
scrupulous care, all
factitious delay, vexation
and expense.
Identifier: | JB/042/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-11-12 |
1-21 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
146 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d1 |
||
john flowerdew colls |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1824 |
|||
13069 |
|||