JB/042/354/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/354/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1824. March 1825 Nov. 3. ++ 1827 Nov. 15<lb/>
Constitutional Code.</head>
 
<!-- Following 2 marginal notes are deleted -->
<note>Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively<lb/>
&sect;.<del>15.</del><add>13</add> Justice for the <del>poorest</del> <add>Helpless</add></note>
 
<note>When indigence on defendant's<lb/>
side, law a positive<lb/>
instrument of the evil.<lb/>
A tyranny in which part<lb/>
taken by Legislator &amp; Judge<lb/>
more direct.</note>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/>
Art. 8. Thus far, as to the mode in which the<lb/>
evil is produced, where the indigence is on the Pursuer's<lb/>
side. In so far as it is on the Defendant's side,<lb/>
<del>the power of</del> the law is <add>an <del>the</del> instrument of the evil,</add> not merely in a negative,<lb/>
but <add>actually</add> in a positive way. <del>the <add>grand</add> instrument by the operation<lb/>
of which the evil is produced.</del> In this case, any<lb/>
person who, <del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> <add>finding himself in a state of relative opulence</add> chooses to take for<lb/>
this purpose a station on the pursuer's side, is thus<lb/>
by the power which the legislator and the Judge offer to his hands,<lb/>
enabled to inflict, on every person, relatively indigent,<lb/>
whom he has any desire thus to injure, suffering in<lb/>
any shape, in which, <del>on any occasion, on the score</del> <add>against a demand requiring it to be</add><lb/>
submitted to, whether on the <del>score</del> <add>score</add> of <del><gap/></del> alleged guilt or otherwise, <note><add>he is,</add> by want of the<lb/>
necessary pecuniary<lb/>
supply, bereft of<lb/>
the means of</note><lb/>
<del>of guilt or otherwise, and person is empowered by law<lb/>
<gap/></del> of making what would <del><gap/></del> be regarded a satisfactory defence.<lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/><gap/>.</del> Here then is a tyranny, of which the<lb/>
powers of the Legislator and that of the Judge, are in<lb/>
a more  direct way the instruments. <!-- Paragraph mark --> <del><gap/><gap/><gap/></del></p>
 
<note><!-- This note is deleted -->Also original &amp; incidental<lb/>
but in <hi rend="underline">both</hi> cases <hi rend="underline">judicial</hi></note>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/>
<add>Art. 9. In this case</add> the distinction between the original and the incidental<lb/>
evil, as above, has place likewise. In neither<lb/>
case, however, can it be termed <hi rend="underline">extrajudicial</hi>:<lb/>
in both cases, it is <add>strictly and</add> purely <hi rend="underline">judicial</hi>: <del>the power of the</del> <add>in both cases it is</add><lb/>
exclusively of legal and judicial manufacture: <del>with</del> by the express <note>ordinance, or what comes<lb/>
to the same thing, by<lb/>
the tacit allowance<lb/>
of the legislator, the<lb/>
power of the Judge</note><lb/>
Judge being the very <del>and only</del> instrument by which<lb/>
<del>it</del> <add>the evil</add> is produced.<!-- Paragraph mark --></p>
 
<note><!-- This note is deleted -->Even when positive proof<lb/>
requisite &#x2014; result the same<lb/>
<add>when</add> too indigent to produce evidence<lb/>
to prove innocence &#x2014; or<lb/>
prosecute for paying.</note>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/>
<add>Art. 10.</add> <add>An exception may appear to be presented, by</add> those cases <del>above excepted,</del> in which,<lb/>
for conviction, positive proof of delinquency is<lb/>
made necessary, the circumstantial and negative<lb/>
proof afforded by non-appearance <add>or non-defence</add> not being taken<lb/>
for conclusive. But, even where <del><gap/></del> positive proof<lb/>
is thus made requisite, the same disastrous consequence may be<lb/>
the <del>assured</del> foreseen and <del>assured</del> <add>preassured</add> result of relative <del><gap/></del> indigence.<lb/>
In the case of a criminal prosecution the innocence<lb/>
of the defendant <del>is capable of being proved</del> <add>would be made manifest (suppose)</add> by the true and <del>conclu</del> <add>conclusive</add><lb/>
evidence, if produced: but, the production of it can not be effected<lb/>
without <sic>expence</sic>, and he has not wherewithal to defray that<lb/>
<sic>expence</sic>, much less to defray the <sic>expence</sic> of a prosecution, as for perjury<lb/>
<add>against</add><lb/>
<note>against false witnesses<lb/>
if engaged, on <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> pursuer's<lb/>
side. In this condition,<lb/>
every adversary who is<lb/>
profligate enough to be<lb/>
ready to take advantage<lb/>
of it, beholds in him a<lb/>
victim, to whom escape from <del>slaughter</del> <add>destruction</add> is impossible. <!-- Paragraph mark --></note></p>
 
<note>Art. 11.</note>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:42, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. March 1825 Nov. 3. ++ 1827 Nov. 15
Constitutional Code.

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
§.15.13 Justice for the poorest Helpless

When indigence on defendant's
side, law a positive
instrument of the evil.
A tyranny in which part
taken by Legislator & Judge
more direct.

Instructional
Art. 8. Thus far, as to the mode in which the
evil is produced, where the indigence is on the Pursuer's
side. In so far as it is on the Defendant's side,
the power of the law is an the instrument of the evil, not merely in a negative,
but actually in a positive way. the grand instrument by the operation
of which the evil is produced.
In this case, any
person who, finding himself in a state of relative opulence chooses to take for
this purpose a station on the pursuer's side, is thus
by the power which the legislator and the Judge offer to his hands,
enabled to inflict, on every person, relatively indigent,
whom he has any desire thus to injure, suffering in
any shape, in which, on any occasion, on the score against a demand requiring it to be
submitted to, whether on the score score of alleged guilt or otherwise, he is, by want of the
necessary pecuniary
supply, bereft of
the means of

of guilt or otherwise, and person is empowered by law
of making what would be regarded a satisfactory defence.
. Here then is a tyranny, of which the
powers of the Legislator and that of the Judge, are in
a more direct way the instruments.

Also original & incidental
but in both cases judicial

Instructional
Art. 9. In this case the distinction between the original and the incidental
evil, as above, has place likewise. In neither
case, however, can it be termed extrajudicial:
in both cases, it is strictly and purely judicial: the power of the in both cases it is
exclusively of legal and judicial manufacture: with by the express ordinance, or what comes
to the same thing, by
the tacit allowance
of the legislator, the
power of the Judge

Judge being the very and only instrument by which
it the evil is produced.

Even when positive proof
requisite — result the same
when too indigent to produce evidence
to prove innocence — or
prosecute for paying.

Instructional
Art. 10. An exception may appear to be presented, by those cases above excepted, in which,
for conviction, positive proof of delinquency is
made necessary, the circumstantial and negative
proof afforded by non-appearance or non-defence not being taken
for conclusive. But, even where positive proof
is thus made requisite, the same disastrous consequence may be
the assured foreseen and assured preassured result of relative indigence.
In the case of a criminal prosecution the innocence
of the defendant is capable of being proved would be made manifest (suppose) by the true and conclu conclusive
evidence, if produced: but, the production of it can not be effected
without expence, and he has not wherewithal to defray that
expence, much less to defray the expence of a prosecution, as for perjury
against
against false witnesses
if engaged, on the pursuer's
side. In this condition,
every adversary who is
profligate enough to be
ready to take advantage
of it, beholds in him a
victim, to whom escape from slaughter destruction is impossible.

Art. 11.




Identifier: | JB/042/354/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

354

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

instructional

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

13277

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in