JB/042/640/001

Click Here To Edit

1824. Decr 19
Constitutional Code

7
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
2 §. 26 Judge's
§. Habitiment
1. Judge
2. Government Advocate
3. Eleemosynary Advocate
4. Deputes.

Wigs cast off. Instructions

21
Difference between
Judge's & lawyer's should
be conspicuous

If both have gowns the difference between that
of the Judge and that of the Law practitioners should be conspicuous.
When affording the most conspicuous distinction, there can
be no need of any in stripe. Colour of the Judge's plain: that
of the Lawyers . The Judge's tone than
black: black gives the air of gloom and severity rending
the wearer an object rather of terror than amenable regard.
Colour of the Lawyers Cloak and brown and white
or black and white striped: this would be
emblematic: in such a degree sort that conception and recollection
might be needed

22
Functionary Advocates,
to be distinguished from
non functionary ones

The functionary Advocates should in this way be distinguished
to the eye from the on-functionary ones. Colours
in the first case say black and white: in the others
brown and white. In the case of the Government Advocate
the black stripe twin or three as broad as the white in
the case of the Advocate of the Helpless the stripe
twice or three as broad as the black.

23
Deputes dress the same
as their principal

In every instance the dress costume of the Deputes, whether
permanent or occasional should be the same as that of
their respective principals.

Identifier: | JB/042/640/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1824-12-19	Marginal Summary Numbering	21-23
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	640	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d7 / e7
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	13563
Box Contents