JB/002/506/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/506/002: Difference between revisions

Robmagin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/002/506/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/002/506/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<note>5</note><lb/>
<p>ton in the bill; the labour &amp; <add>use of the</add> premises are charged at a rate <note>he honesty of the men<lb/> in taking advantage of</note><lb/>
very much below the ordinary rate of payment&#x2014; <del>the total rate</del><lb/>
<del>per ton of</del> the vessel produced is a vessel very well able<lb/>
to carry guns which will make it equal in force to any of the<lb/>
gun brigs, though this vessel (including the £50 <add>unnecessary</add> pounds) comes<lb/>
to nor more than £ per ton.</p>
<p>"<del>No</del> 39, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account" Before I enter into the particulars<lb/>
of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account, it may be necessary to observe that<lb/>
I did require particulars from him, but observing at the same time<lb/>
that "he best knew what would required" this I supposed he would<lb/>
be well acquainted with, in consequence of his frequent mercantile<lb/>
transactions with the <unclear>No3</unclear>; &amp; I have all along held up to him<lb/>
that the <unclear>No3</unclear> would have to examine these accounts, &amp; that they<lb/>
would probably be scrutinized with an unusual degree of attention</p>
<p>Article 4 "least paid" I <del><gap/></del> request an explanation of the <unclear>No3</unclear> observations <lb/>
on this head, as I am at a loss to make up any sum<lb/>
of the amount of 266.11.2 <sic>forwhich</sic> no services are mentioned.</p>
<p>A5 "Wages" The particulars are now specified, but I must observe<lb/>
that the rate of payment way very much enhanced, by the<lb/> difficulties made in the <gap/> to the lending of there men at the<lb/>
outset of the business, <del>whereby wage <gap/> caused</del> these men thought<lb/>
themselves justified in refusing to work at Redbridge for less<lb/>
than the exorbitant sum of 9 shillings per day.</p>


<p>ton in the bin; the labour &amp; <add>we of the</add> premiers are charged at a rate<lb/> very much below the ordinary rate of payment&#x2014; <del>the total rate</del><lb/> <del>per ton of</del> the vessel produced is a vessel very well able<lb/> to carry guns which will make it equal in force to any of the<lb/> gun brigs, though this vessel (including the £50 <add>unnecessary</add> pounds) comes<lb/> to nor more than £ per ton.</p>
<p>Articles, "7 to 11 inclusive. These charges I myself thought exorbitant<lb/>  
<p>"Nr 39, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account" Before I enter into the parti-<lb/>-culars of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poores account, it may be necessary to observe that<lb/> I did require particulars from him, but observing at the same time<lb/> that "he best knew what would required" this I supposed he would<lb/> be well acquainted with, in consequence of his frequent mercantile<lb/> transaction with the <unclear>Noz</unclear>; &amp; I have all along held up to him<lb/> that the <unclear>noz</unclear> would have to examine there accounts, &amp; they they<lb/> would probably be scrutinized with an unusual degree of at ten-<lb/>tion</p>
&amp; took no small pains to induce M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Poore to diminish them but<lb/> without effect. Mr Poore alleges that they are <add>made</add> at a rate similar to what<lb/>  
<p>Article 4 "leach paid" I <del><gap/></del> request an explanation of the <unclear>Ntz</unclear> obser<lb/>vations on this head, as I am at a loss to make up any num<lb/> of the amount of 266.11.2 for which no services are mentioned.</p>
other merchants &amp; builders would have charged; -&amp; I must confess that there seems<lb/>  
<p>A5 "Wages" The particulars are now specified, but I must observe<lb/> that the rate of payment way very much enhanced, by the<lb/> difficulties made in the <unclear>Sy</unclear> to the lending of there man of the<lb/> outlet of the barrack, <del>which <gap/></del> these men thought<lb/> themselves justified in refusing to work at Redbridge for less<lb/> than the exorbitant sum of 9 shillings per day.</p>
reason upon examination into the prices paid by Government for the<lb/>  
<p>Article, "7 to 11 inclusive. These charges I myself thought exorbitant<lb/> &amp; took no small pains to induce Mr Poore to diminish them but<lb/> without effect. Mr Poore alleges that they are <add>made</add> at a rate similar to what<lb/> other merchants &amp; builders would have charged; &amp; I must confess that there seems<lb/> reason upon examination into the prices paid by Government for the<lb/> building  &amp; repairs of vessels to believe that the profits of individuals<lb/> cannot in many instances have been less.</p>
building  &amp; repairs of vessels to believe that the profits of individuals<lb/>  
<p>No 40. Richard </p>
cannot in many instances have been less.</p>
<p>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 40. Richard Upsall for sundries."<unclear>&amp;</unclear> shipwrights work. This is"<add>"one"</add></p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:27, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit 5

ton in the bill; the labour & use of the premises are charged at a rate he honesty of the men
in taking advantage of

very much below the ordinary rate of payment— the total rate
per ton of the vessel produced is a vessel very well able
to carry guns which will make it equal in force to any of the
gun brigs, though this vessel (including the £50 unnecessary pounds) comes
to nor more than £ per ton.

"No 39, Mr Poores account" Before I enter into the particulars
of Mr Poores account, it may be necessary to observe that
I did require particulars from him, but observing at the same time
that "he best knew what would required" this I supposed he would
be well acquainted with, in consequence of his frequent mercantile
transactions with the No3; & I have all along held up to him
that the No3 would have to examine these accounts, & that they
would probably be scrutinized with an unusual degree of attention

Article 4 "least paid" I request an explanation of the No3 observations
on this head, as I am at a loss to make up any sum
of the amount of 266.11.2 forwhich no services are mentioned.

A5 "Wages" The particulars are now specified, but I must observe
that the rate of payment way very much enhanced, by the
difficulties made in the to the lending of there men at the
outset of the business, whereby wage caused these men thought
themselves justified in refusing to work at Redbridge for less
than the exorbitant sum of 9 shillings per day.

Articles, "7 to 11 inclusive. These charges I myself thought exorbitant
& took no small pains to induce Mr Poore to diminish them but
without effect. Mr Poore alleges that they are made at a rate similar to what
other merchants & builders would have charged; -& I must confess that there seems
reason upon examination into the prices paid by Government for the
building & repairs of vessels to believe that the profits of individuals
cannot in many instances have been less.

No 40. Richard Upsall for sundries."& shipwrights work. This is""one"


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/002/506/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

2

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

506

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

A2 / F2

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::I TAYLOR [top of 1795]]]

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Evan Nepean

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1795

Notes public

ID Number

1245

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in