JB/096/033/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/033/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/033/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/033/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
<p><add>how to conduct ourselves towards other men.  To what men?  to those <del>with</del> who are members of the same Society, with whom we have</add><!-- addition in red ink -->  would have known, that a strict obedience
<lb/>
<add>frequent intercourse.  What is a rule of civil conduct?  Why it is <add>that too</add> is a rule directing us how we are to conduct ourselves towards those</add><!-- addition in red ink --> to the letter, and the Spirit of Civil law, is
<lb/>
<add>who are members of the same Society, with whom we have frequent intercourse. &#x2014;  How would you characterise a good moral</add><!-- addition in red ink --> of the very essence, <del>and perfection</del> of morality.
<lb/>
<add>man?  Would you not say <del>it</del> <add>he</add> is a moral man all whose actions</add><!-- addition in red ink --> For what I would ask him characterises
<lb/>
<add>tend to promote the public good?<add>4</add><!-- written above the 'od' of the previous word --> <note>4(throw quotation from <gap/><!-- looks like 'Heloction' ? --> on opposite page into a note)</note><!-- note written in red ink -->  how would</add><!-- addition in red ink --> a good moral man?  Is it not, that all his
<lb/>
<add>you characterise a good Citizen?  In the</add><!-- addition in red ink --> actions tend to promote the public good?
<lb/>
<add>same words. &#x2014; Where then is the difference between a</add><!-- addition in red ink --> The end<del>s</del> for which men enter into Society
<lb/>
<add><del>good</del> the rule of moral conduct &amp; the rule of civil</add><!-- addition in red ink --> is the promotion of the happiness of each individual:
<lb/>
<add>conduct?  or does morality require you to promote the</add><!-- addition in red ink --> the great object of Legislation is,
<lb/>
<add>happiness of those only, whom you never see, with whom</add><!-- addition in red ink --> to make, the happiness of the Community
<lb/>
<add>you have no intercourse?  or will our Author </add><!-- addition in red ink --> at large, and the happiness of each Individual
<lb/>
<add>advance that obedience to the Laws does not</add><!-- addition in red ink --> coincide.  What then constitutes a
<lb/>
<add>tend to promote the public good?</add><!-- addition in red ink --> moral man but a cooperation to this important
<lb/>
<add>He does indeed <del>say</del> advance what amounts to this</add><!-- addition in red ink --> end?  For what other reason can <add><del>a</del></add><!-- addition in black ink, deletion in red ink --> <add>when he <add>makes</add> <add>a</add></add><!-- all 3 addition here in red ink -->
<lb/></p>
 
<head>85)</head><!-- heading in red ink -->






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


how to conduct ourselves towards other men. To what men? to those with who are members of the same Society, with whom we have would have known, that a strict obedience
frequent intercourse. What is a rule of civil conduct? Why it is <add>that too is a rule directing us how we are to conduct ourselves towards those</add> to the letter, and the Spirit of Civil law, is
who are members of the same Society, with whom we have frequent intercourse. — How would you characterise a good moral of the very essence, and perfection of morality.
man? Would you not say it <add>he is a moral man all whose actions</add> For what I would ask him characterises
tend to promote the public good?<add>4 4(throw quotation from on opposite page into a note) how would</add> a good moral man? Is it not, that all his
you characterise a good Citizen? In the actions tend to promote the public good?
same words. — Where then is the difference between a The ends for which men enter into Society
good the rule of moral conduct & the rule of civil is the promotion of the happiness of each individual:
conduct? or does morality require you to promote the the great object of Legislation is,
happiness of those only, whom you never see, with whom to make, the happiness of the Community
you have no intercourse? or will our Author at large, and the happiness of each Individual
advance that obedience to the Laws does not coincide. What then constitutes a
tend to promote the public good? moral man but a cooperation to this important
He does indeed say advance what amounts to this end? For what other reason can a when he <add>makes a</add>

85)




Identifier: | JB/096/033/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

033

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c84 / c85 / c86 / c87

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31037

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in