★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>Marg. Contents Dispensing Power</head> | ||
<p>Dispensing Power</p> | |||
<p>10<lb/>No measure however <lb/> good - not even the <lb/> Penitentiary system <lb/> could be worth purchasing <lb/> at such a <lb/> price . p.11 </p><p> 11. <lb/> The principle employ'd <lb/> as a pretence is <lb/> doubly adverse to <lb/> the authority of <lb/> Parliament - being <lb/> as adverse to the <lb/> Hulks as to the <lb/> penitentiary system. <lb/> p.12. </p><p> 12 <lb/> But as the Hulks <lb/> did not stand in <lb/> the way of the object <lb/> of the conspiracy <lb/> the principle <lb/> does not appear to <lb/> have interfered with <lb/> them in the application <lb/> to practice. - <lb/> p.13</p> <p>13.<lb/> Parliament could <lb/> not be applied to <lb/> <del> sacl </del> sanction the <lb/> the Goals as a substitute <lb/> to the Hulks. because <lb/> Parliament had already <lb/> provided its <lb/> own substitute - <lb/> the Penitentiary House. <lb/> p.14 </p> <p>14. <lb/>The doing the business <lb/> themselves instead <lb/> of coming to Parliament <lb/> was the result not <lb/> of inadvertence but <lb/> of deliberation - and <lb/> as being necessary to <lb/> the object of the <lb/> conspiracy. - p.16 </p> <p>15<lb/> It therefore becomes <lb/> necessary to decide <lb/> the question of <lb/> authority between <lb/> Parliament the <lb/> Duke &c. p.17 </p> <pb/> | |||
<p>Dispensing Power <add>7 G.3.c.7 <add><gap/></add>Indemnity Act</add></p> | |||
<p> 1<lb/>The apparent <lb/> negatives put upon <lb/> the Hulk System is <lb/> not a proof of <add> any </add> such <lb/>precipitation as affords <lb/> an estimation <lb/> in the case of the negative <lb/> put upon the <lb/> Penitentiary System - <lb/> (the precipitating was <lb/> only in the <hi rend="underline">mode of</hi> <lb/> <hi rend="underline">execution</hi> - art in <lb/> the <hi rend="underline">design</hi> p.1, 2</p> <p> 2<lb/> <hi rend="underline">Blindness</hi> in <hi rend="underline">ambition</hi><lb/> is no excuse <lb/> for it p.2.</p> <p>3<lb/> The blindness was <lb/> promised - not by the <lb/> consciousness of <unclear>Ministers</unclear> <lb/> cause but by the <lb/> persuasion of security<lb/> - considering, <lb/> as he did, the <lb/> support of his colleagues <lb/> as tantamount to law. p.3</p><!-- note in different ink --><p> It seems so odd that <lb/> at this time of day a <lb/> minister should lack <lb/> such <unclear>conscience</unclear> but <lb/> you see they could <lb/> not do <gap/> </p> <p> 4.<lb/> The lead particular <lb/> reason to look upon <lb/> himself is secure <lb/> against the interposition <lb/> of Parliament. p.4 </p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Dispensing Power</p> | |||
<p>5<lb/> Standard of security <lb/> and insecurity different <lb/> in my case <lb/> mid the duties <lb/>p. 4,5.</p> <p>6<lb/> <hi rend="underline">My</hi> wish is that <lb/> the Duke as well as <lb/> myself pleased be covered <lb/> <add> & protected </add> by the Law of Parliament <lb/> - his is - that <lb/> Parliament not I should <lb/> be bound by his lien <lb/> and that I should be <lb/> without protection <lb/>p.5,6. </p><p> 7<lb/>The man frivolous <lb/> the object for which <lb/> Parliament is <unclear>continued</unclear> <lb/> the more flagrant <lb/> the contempt. <lb/> p.7 </p> <p>8<lb/> The evasion of the <lb/> rights of Parliament by <lb/>the Stuarts, was to get <lb/> possession of the public <lb/>purse - or for the <lb/> declaration of Souls. p.7 </p> <p>9<lb/> - that by the D. of <lb/> Portland was for some <lb/> paltry object such <lb/> as the caprice of Lord <lb/> Belgrave <lb/> - or a job for some <lb/> friend of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Baldwins.<lb/> p.8 </p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Dispensing Power</p> | |||
<p> 1<lb/> Objection or excuse - <lb/> the crime of usurping <lb/> upon Parliament <lb/> was an unnecessary one since <lb/>the same object <lb/> might have been <lb/> compassed through <lb/> Parliament.<lb/> Answer - So it <lb/> may seem from <lb/> general actions.<lb/> p.1. </p><p> 2.<lb/>But in this particular <lb/> case <hi rend="underline">no</hi><lb/> The eloguims bestowed <lb/> on the plan <lb/>would have called <lb/> for reasons for the <lb/>relinquishment of it.<lb/> p.2.</p><p>3.<lb/> Calumny such as <lb/> that <!-- space --> by the <lb/> Treasury could not<lb/> have expected to <lb/>pass uncontradicted <lb/> in the House. p.2</p> <p>4.<lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitts pride would <lb/> prevent him from <lb/> speaking in disapprobation <lb/> of <lb/> his own measure. <lb/> p.3.</p><p>4* <lb/>A sanction for the <lb/> Gaol measures would <lb/> have been still more <lb/> hopeless. The objection <lb/> would have been <lb/> as above with the <lb/> additional one from <lb/> the absurdity of the <lb/> measure. p.4. </p> <p>5.<lb/> The Duke had nobody <lb/> to propose it <lb/> in the Commons - <lb/> King & Bladwin <lb/> could not serve <lb/> him here. p.5 </p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Dispensing Power</p> | |||
<p> 6.<lb/> It is not pleasant to <lb/>Ministers to come to <lb/> Parliament for what <lb/> they think they <del><gap/></del><lb/> can do of themselves <lb/>without it. p.6. </p> <p>7. <lb/> If the crime was not <lb/> necessary the unnecessariness<lb/> of it (since <add> as </add> <lb/>it was committed <lb/> would only prove <lb/> the <!-- space --> to <lb/> guilt. p.7. </p><p>8. <lb/> Two crimes in <lb/>fact the <sic>exercize</sic> of <lb/> super <!-- space --> and <lb/> despotic power - x <lb/>declared assumption <lb/> of it. The first <lb/> alone necessary the <lb/> other alone unnecessary <lb/> and foolish. p.8. </p> <p>9<lb/> The apparent impossibility <lb/> of the <lb/> crime is thus done <lb/> away though not <lb/> the wonderfulness <lb/> p.9.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Marg. Contents Dispensing Power
Dispensing Power
10
No measure however
good - not even the
Penitentiary system
could be worth purchasing
at such a
price . p.11
11.
The principle employ'd
as a pretence is
doubly adverse to
the authority of
Parliament - being
as adverse to the
Hulks as to the
penitentiary system.
p.12.
12
But as the Hulks
did not stand in
the way of the object
of the conspiracy
the principle
does not appear to
have interfered with
them in the application
to practice. -
p.13
13.
Parliament could
not be applied to
sacl sanction the
the Goals as a substitute
to the Hulks. because
Parliament had already
provided its
own substitute -
the Penitentiary House.
p.14
14.
The doing the business
themselves instead
of coming to Parliament
was the result not
of inadvertence but
of deliberation - and
as being necessary to
the object of the
conspiracy. - p.16
15
It therefore becomes
necessary to decide
the question of
authority between
Parliament the
Duke &c. p.17
---page break---
Dispensing Power 7 G.3.c.7 <add>Indemnity Act</add>
1
The apparent
negatives put upon
the Hulk System is
not a proof of any such
precipitation as affords
an estimation
in the case of the negative
put upon the
Penitentiary System -
(the precipitating was
only in the mode of
execution - art in
the design p.1, 2
2
Blindness in ambition
is no excuse
for it p.2.
3
The blindness was
promised - not by the
consciousness of Ministers
cause but by the
persuasion of security
- considering,
as he did, the
support of his colleagues
as tantamount to law. p.3
It seems so odd that
at this time of day a
minister should lack
such conscience but
you see they could
not do
4.
The lead particular
reason to look upon
himself is secure
against the interposition
of Parliament. p.4
---page break---
Dispensing Power
5
Standard of security
and insecurity different
in my case
mid the duties
p. 4,5.
6
My wish is that
the Duke as well as
myself pleased be covered
& protected by the Law of Parliament
- his is - that
Parliament not I should
be bound by his lien
and that I should be
without protection
p.5,6.
7
The man frivolous
the object for which
Parliament is continued
the more flagrant
the contempt.
p.7
8
The evasion of the
rights of Parliament by
the Stuarts, was to get
possession of the public
purse - or for the
declaration of Souls. p.7
9
- that by the D. of
Portland was for some
paltry object such
as the caprice of Lord
Belgrave
- or a job for some
friend of Mr Baldwins.
p.8
---page break---
Dispensing Power
1
Objection or excuse -
the crime of usurping
upon Parliament
was an unnecessary one since
the same object
might have been
compassed through
Parliament.
Answer - So it
may seem from
general actions.
p.1.
2.
But in this particular
case no
The eloguims bestowed
on the plan
would have called
for reasons for the
relinquishment of it.
p.2.
3.
Calumny such as
that by the
Treasury could not
have expected to
pass uncontradicted
in the House. p.2
4.
Mr Pitts pride would
prevent him from
speaking in disapprobation
of
his own measure.
p.3.
4*
A sanction for the
Gaol measures would
have been still more
hopeless. The objection
would have been
as above with the
additional one from
the absurdity of the
measure. p.4.
5.
The Duke had nobody
to propose it
in the Commons -
King & Bladwin
could not serve
him here. p.5
---page break---
Dispensing Power
6.
It is not pleasant to
Ministers to come to
Parliament for what
they think they
can do of themselves
without it. p.6.
7.
If the crime was not
necessary the unnecessariness
of it (since as
it was committed
would only prove
the to
guilt. p.7.
8.
Two crimes in
fact the exercize of
super and
despotic power - x
declared assumption
of it. The first
alone necessary the
other alone unnecessary
and foolish. p.8.
9
The apparent impossibility
of the
crime is thus done
away though not
the wonderfulness
p.9.
|
Identifier: | JB/121/007/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1, 1*, 2-15, 1-9, 1-9 |
|||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
007 |
Dispensing Power Marg. Contents |
||
|
003 |
Dispensing Power |
||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
|||
|
CW 1799 |
|||
|
C. Abbit Lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
