JB/121/038/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/038/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>14 Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1802 Before F 3</head>
<head>§8 Establishment increased</head>


<p>In the title of this Section, Your Lordship sees at <note>3 Beginning, end,<lb/> &amp; final case of<lb/> the business shewn<lb/> by the title of the<lb/> section</note><lb/> once the commencement of this branch <add>part</add> of the business &#x2014; <lb/>the termination &#x2014; and <del>on one part</del> <add>on the part of the higher powers</add> the final cause <lb/>of it: an augmentation granted: <del>had</del> the grant <sic>employ'd</sic> <lb/>by the grantors themselves as a pretence for crushing the establishment <lb/>instead of increasing it: and the intended destruction not <lb/>only the result of the pretended increase, but the very object <!-- continues in margin -->[<del>which they had in view</del>] for the purpose of which they announced it.</p>


<p>In the <gap/> and ever memorable <del>confusion</del> <note>Increase of the<lb/> Establishment to<lb/> 2000 started<lb/> and not disapproved<lb/> of in the first<lb/> conversation with<lb/> King in Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1798</note><lb/> <del>of</del> (I had almost <del>said <gap/></del> so far forgot myself <lb/>as to say <hi rend="underline">conference</hi>) of Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1798 &#x2014; in the <lb/>moment of <add>effervescence and</add> reciprocal expansion (reciprocal as I <lb/>fondly thought it) <del>I</del> that took place during the honeymoon, <lb/>or rather honey-minute, of <del>our</del> <add>the</add> inauspicious <lb/>union of two such ill-paired minds &#x2014; a topic <lb/>was started &#x2014; I scarce remember by which <add>of the interlocutors</add> <del>th</del> <lb/>by the destined victim or the <del>self</del> predestinated executor <lb/>&#x2014; that of the <hi rend="underline">numbers</hi> to which the <lb/>building was to be adapted: <del>and consequently the</del> <add>from whence resulted by implication</add> <lb/>and without any express mention of it, the consideration of the question of the <lb/>allowance for the expence. <del>of it</del> To increase <add>add any thing</add> the <lb/>number<del>s</del> <add>of convicts, <del>the Con</del></add> which the Treasury should <del>be</del> stand bound <lb/>to fund for me, was certainly never
mentioned &#x2014; <add>a proposition never <add>so much as</add> mentioned on either part:</add> for <lb/>on my part it would not so much as have been <lb/>accepted. <del>could any such offer have been expected</del>: <add>were it possible it should have been made:</add> <lb/>but what did not appear to me too much <add>either</add> to expect, <lb/>or to prepare was the &#x2014; the enlarging the <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>content of the building<lb/> to a degree adequate<lb/> to the  <add>eventual</add> reception<lb/> of such greater number,<lb/> as,</note> <del>number <lb/><add>physically</add> capable of being provided for if supplied, to</del>  an<lb/> <del>equality
with the number that,
</del> calculating from
past <lb/>experience,
would otherwise have been provided for, under
<lb/>systems that, by
Parliament at least, had
been deemed less <lb/>
<del>eligible</del>. <lb/> <add>eligible.</add>  </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:31, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

14 Feby 1802 Before F 3 §8 Establishment increased

In the title of this Section, Your Lordship sees at 3 Beginning, end,
& final case of
the business shewn
by the title of the
section

once the commencement of this branch part of the business —
the termination — and on one part on the part of the higher powers the final cause
of it: an augmentation granted: had the grant employ'd
by the grantors themselves as a pretence for crushing the establishment
instead of increasing it: and the intended destruction not
only the result of the pretended increase, but the very object [which they had in view] for the purpose of which they announced it.

In the and ever memorable confusion Increase of the
Establishment to
2000 started
and not disapproved
of in the first
conversation with
King in Decr 1798

of (I had almost said so far forgot myself
as to say conference) of Decr 1798 — in the
moment of effervescence and reciprocal expansion (reciprocal as I
fondly thought it) I that took place during the honeymoon,
or rather honey-minute, of our the inauspicious
union of two such ill-paired minds — a topic
was started — I scarce remember by which of the interlocutors th
by the destined victim or the self predestinated executor
— that of the numbers to which the
building was to be adapted: and consequently the from whence resulted by implication
and without any express mention of it, the consideration of the question of the
allowance for the expence. of it To increase add any thing the
numbers of convicts, the Con which the Treasury should be stand bound
to fund for me, was certainly never mentioned — a proposition never <add>so much as mentioned on either part:</add> for
on my part it would not so much as have been
accepted. could any such offer have been expected: were it possible it should have been made:
but what did not appear to me too much either to expect,
or to prepare was the — the enlarging the [+] content of the building
to a degree adequate
to the eventual reception
of such greater number,
as,
number
physically capable of being provided for if supplied, to
an
equality with the number that, calculating from past
experience, would otherwise have been provided for, under
systems that, by Parliament at least, had been deemed less
eligible.
eligible.



Identifier: | JB/121/038/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-02-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

038

Info in main headings field

Establishment encreased

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in