JB/122/150/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/150/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p> <add> 28 July 1808 </add> <add> Charge 9 </add> <add>12</add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/>5 Information withholden <lb/>15 or 3 <lb/>2. - but indirect <lb/> notice of an alarming<lb/> tendency - <gap/> <lb/>rejection: viz. <lb/> With this evidence before <lb/> him his call for <lb/> "other evidence"</note></p>


<p> <add> 12 </add> <lb/><del> In an indirect way, and in  effect <gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/><add>Of the tender <gap/> made <add> by the <gap/> </add> together with the prayer annexed to it <add> Mr Chief Inspector</add> in </add><lb/><add>an indirect way, <del><gap/></del>, in this instance as in every</add> <lb/><add> other, <del> Mr Chief Inspector</del> does indeed take notice.  By implication and <lb/><add> inference, he </add> given the Accountant <add> formed for appraising and </add> <del> to understand </del>  that <add>including </add> the testimony <lb/>they tendered, would not, any part of it, be received.<lb/> <del> either</del> would not be received in either of the two <lb/> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> proposed <del> as above </del> by way of example <add> as above </add> or in <lb/>any other &#x2014; <add> shape</add> <del> <gap/> </del> </p>


<p><sic>T'is</sic> with the <gap/> of this testimony viz the <lb/> testimony of these two persons before his eyes, he <lb/> calls for <hi rend="underline">other</hi> evidence: <add> other evidence </add> from a different <hi rend="underline">source</hi> and <lb/>in a different <hi rend="underline">form</hi>: viz <hi rend="underline">the receipts of the</hi> <lb/> "<hi rend="underline">parties</hi>" (meaning the <add> several</add> workmen to whom the several <lb/>weekly payments <del> recorded</del> <add> entered </add> in the said Account Books<lb/> <note><add>[+]</add> True it is, that <gap/> <del>be endured </del> <gap/> goes on, and in general terms given to the Accountant the option between that and (to use his own words) <gap/> "<hi rend="underline">other</hi> evidence"</note> <lb/>were made) <del> For there ended his <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> <del> In addition </del></add> <add> <del> In the other evidence <gap/> specially <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/>
<del> in the way of <add> he ended giving and <gap/> </add> on the <gap/> of <gap/> evidence. </del> <add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </add></p>


<p> But by the words <del> such </del> "other evidence" <add> is <del> then </del> <add> <gap/> </add> employed by him) he could <lb/>scarcely have meant, or wished to be understood to mean, <lb/>the evidence so tendered as above, or any part of <lb/>it: This <add> <hi rend="superscript">[+2]</hi> evidence </add> <del> meaning must have been </del> <add> which <del> <gap/> <del> <add> it </add> can not but </add> have been his <lb/> <note> <del> [+]</del> <add> [+2] For, had that been his </add> <del> with every <gap/> </del> <gap/>, he would <del>then</del> of course, have designated by its appropriate description the evidence <del> that already <add> being </add> abovementioned</del> which, on this supposition, he meant should be producing viz the evidence that had already been tendered</note> <lb/><add> wish to be understood to call for, is therefore - </add> <del> <gap/> wish <gap/> <gap/> </del> some evidence <hi rend="underline">other</hi> than <lb/>any that had <add> as yet</add> been tendered: in a word, the object <lb/>of this part of the communication was - to give <lb/>to the Accountant to understand <add> though without <add> the Inspector </add> so far committing himself as to say so formally<lb/>as the <add> Accountant </add> had to produce, be it what it might, would <lb/>not be received as satisfactory and sufficient; <lb/>but that whatever it might be <add> that was produced, some other </add> <del> some </del> evidence viz <lb/> <del> whatever it might be </del> would <add> still </add> be called for and insisted <lb/>upon -  <add> some other evidence</add> which he <hi rend="underline">had</hi> not to produce: and so, <hi rend="underline">toties</hi>
<hi rend="underline">quoties</hi> </p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

28 July 1808 Charge 9 12
Charge
5 Information withholden
15 or 3
2. - but indirect
notice of an alarming
tendency -
rejection: viz.
With this evidence before
him his call for
"other evidence"

12
In an indirect way, and in effect
Of the tender made <add> by the together with the prayer annexed to it Mr Chief Inspector in </add>
an indirect way, , in this instance as in every
other, Mr Chief Inspector does indeed take notice. By implication and
<add> inference, he
given the Accountant formed for appraising and to understand that including the testimony
they tendered, would not, any part of it, be received.
either would not be received in either of the two
proposed as above by way of example as above or in
any other — shape

T'is with the of this testimony viz the
testimony of these two persons before his eyes, he
calls for other evidence: other evidence from a different source and
in a different form: viz the receipts of the
"parties" (meaning the several workmen to whom the several
weekly payments recorded entered in the said Account Books
[+] True it is, that be endured goes on, and in general terms given to the Accountant the option between that and (to use his own words) "other evidence"
were made) For there ended his <add> In addition </add> In the other evidence specially
in the way of he ended giving and on the of evidence.

But by the words such "other evidence" is then <add> employed by him) he could
scarcely have meant, or wished to be understood to mean,
the evidence so tendered as above, or any part of
it: This [+2] evidence meaning must have been which <add> it can not but </add> have been his
[+] [+2] For, had that been his with every , he would then of course, have designated by its appropriate description the evidence that already being abovementioned which, on this supposition, he meant should be producing viz the evidence that had already been tendered
wish to be understood to call for, is therefore - wish some evidence other than
any that had as yet been tendered: in a word, the object
of this part of the communication was - to give
to the Accountant to understand though without <add> the Inspector so far committing himself as to say so formally
as the Accountant had to produce, be it what it might, would
not be received as satisfactory and sufficient;
but that whatever it might be that was produced, some other some evidence viz
whatever it might be would still be called for and insisted
upon - some other evidence which he had not to produce: and so, toties quoties


Identifier: | JB/122/150/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

15 or 3

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

150

Info in main headings field

Charge 9

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D12 / E12

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in